📄 rfc1095.txt
字号:
Network Working Group U. WarrierRequest for Comments: 1095 Unisys Corporation L. Besaw Hewlett-Packard April 1989 The Common Management Information Services and Protocol over TCP/IP (CMOT) Table of Contents1. Status of this Memo ............................................ 32. Introduction ................................................... 4Part I: Concepts and Models ....................................... 73. The OSI Management Framework ................................... 73.1. Architectural Overview ....................................... 73.2. Management Models ............................................ 83.2.1. The Organizational Model ................................... 83.2.2. The Functional Model ....................................... 83.2.3. The Information Model ...................................... 93.3. ISO Application Protocols .................................... 93.3.1. ACSE ....................................................... 103.3.2. ROSE ....................................................... 103.3.3. CMISE ...................................................... 103.3.3.1. Management Association Services .......................... 113.3.3.2. Management Notification Services ......................... 123.3.3.3. Management Operation Services ............................ 124. The CMOT Architecture .......................................... 134.1. Management Models ............................................ 134.1.1. The Organizational Model ................................... 134.1.2. The Functional Model ....................................... 144.1.3. The Information Model ...................................... 144.2. Protocol Architecture ........................................ 144.2.1 The Lightweight Presentation Layer .......................... 154.2.2 The Quality of Transport Service ............................ 164.3. Proxy Management ............................................. 174.4. Directory Service ............................................ 185. Management Information ......................................... 185.1. The Structure of Management Information ...................... 195.1.1. The ISO SMI ................................................ 195.1.1.1. Managed Objects and Attributes ........................... 195.1.1.2. Management Information Hierarchies ....................... 205.1.1.2.1 The Registration Hierarchy .............................. 205.1.1.2.2. The Containment Hierarchy .............................. 205.1.1.2.3. The Inheritance Hierarchy .............................. 225.1.2. The Internet SMI ........................................... 225.2. The Management Information Base .............................. 23Warrier & Besaw [Page 1]RFC 1095 CMOT April 19895.3. An Interpretation of the Internet SMI ........................ 245.3.1. Object Class and Attributes ................................ 255.3.1.1. Object Class ............................................. 255.3.1.2. Attribute Identifier ..................................... 265.3.2. Management Information Hierarchies ......................... 265.3.2.1. The Registration Hierarchy ............................... 265.3.2.2. The Containment Hierarchy ................................ 265.3.2.3. The Inheritance Hierarchy ................................ 285.4. Scoping, Filtering, and Synchronization ...................... 285.4.1. Scoping .................................................... 285.4.2. Filtering .................................................. 295.4.3. Synchronization ............................................ 295.4.4. Linked Replies ............................................. 295.5. Accessing Tables ............................................. 295.5.1. Accessing Whole Tables ..................................... 305.5.2. Accessing Table Entries .................................... 30Part II: Protocol Agreements ...................................... 326. CMOT Protocol Overview ......................................... 326.1. The CMOT Protocol Suite ...................................... 326.2. Conformance Requirements ..................................... 336.3. Abstract Syntax Notation ..................................... 337. Common Management Information Service Element .................. 347.1. CMIS Services ................................................ 347.1.1. CMIS Services Overview ..................................... 347.1.2. Functional Units ........................................... 347.1.3. Functional Unit Groups ..................................... 367.1.4. M-INITIALISE Parameters .................................... 377.1.4.1. Functional Units ......................................... 377.1.4.2. User Information ......................................... 397.1.4.3. Access Control ........................................... 397.2. Supporting Services .......................................... 397.3. CMIP Agreements .............................................. 397.3.1. Invoke Identifier .......................................... 397.3.2. Object Class ............................................... 407.3.3. Object Instance ............................................ 407.3.4. Access Control ............................................. 417.3.5. Synchronization ............................................ 417.3.6. Scope ...................................................... 417.3.7. Filter ..................................................... 417.3.8. Attribute Identifier ....................................... 427.3.9. Event Type Identifier ...................................... 427.3.10. Action Type Identifier .................................... 427.3.11. Time Fields ............................................... 437.3.12. Response PDUs ............................................. 437.3.13. Error PDUs ................................................ 438. Association Control Service Element ............................ 438.1. ACSE Services ................................................ 448.2. Supporting Services .......................................... 44Warrier & Besaw [Page 2]RFC 1095 CMOT April 19898.3. ACSE Protocol ................................................ 458.3.1. Application Context Name ................................... 458.3.2. User Information ........................................... 458.3.3. Presentation Service Parameters ............................ 469. Remote Operations Service Element .............................. 469.1. ROSE Services ................................................ 469.2. Supporting Services .......................................... 479.3. ROSE Protocol ................................................ 479.3.1. Operation Class ............................................ 479.3.2. Priority ................................................... 4810. Lightweight Presentation ...................................... 4810.1. Lightweight Presentation Services ........................... 4810.2. Supporting Services ......................................... 4810.3. Lightweight Presentation Protocol ........................... 4911. Acknowledgements .............................................. 4912. References .................................................... 49Appendix A - The CMOT Group ....................................... 52Appendix B - Management Information Summary ....................... 53Appendix C - Sample Protocol Exchanges ............................ 601. Status of this Memo This memo defines a network management architecture that uses the International Organization for Standardization's (ISO) Common Management Information Services/Common Management Information Protocol (CMIS/CMIP) in a TCP/IP environment. This architecture provides a means by which control and monitoring information can be exchanged between a manager and a remote network element. In particular, this memo defines the means for implementing the Draft International Standard (DIS) version of CMIS/CMIP on top of Internet transport protocols for the purpose of carrying management information defined in the Internet-standard management information base. DIS CMIS/CMIP is suitable for deployment in TCP/IP networks while CMIS/CMIP moves toward becoming an International Standard. Together with the relevant ISO standards and the companion RFCs that describe the initial structure of management information and management information base, these documents provide the basis for a comprehensive architecture and system for managing TCP/IP-based internets, and in particular the Internet. The Internet Activities Board (IAB) has designated two different network management protocols with the same status of "Draft Standard" and "Recommended". The two protocols are the Common Management Information Services and Protocol over TCP/IP (CMOT) (this memo) and the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) [4].Warrier & Besaw [Page 3]RFC 1095 CMOT April 1989 The IAB intends each of these two protocols to receive the attention of implementers and experimenters. The IAB seeks reports of experience with these two protocols from system builders and users. By this action, the IAB recommends that all IP and TCP implementations be network manageable (e.g., implement the Internet MIB [3], and that implementations that are network manageable are expected to adopt and implement at least one of these two Internet Draft Standards. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.2. Introduction As reported in RFC 1052, "IAB Recommendations for the Development of Internet Network Management Standards" [1], the Internet Activities Board (IAB) has directed the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) to coordinate the work of three working groups in the area of network management. First, the MIB working group was charged with the specification and definition of elements to be included in the Management Information Base (MIB). Second, the SNMP working group was charged with defining the modifications to the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) necessary to accommodate the short-term needs of the network vendor and operations communities. Third, the Netman working group was directed to meet the longer-term needs of the Internet community by developing a network management system based on ISO CMIS/CMIP. Both the Netman working group and the SNMP working group were directed to align their work with the output of the MIB working group in order to ensure compatibility of management information between the short-term and long-term approaches to the management of TCP/IP-based internets. This will enable a smooth transition from the short-term protocol (SNMP) to the long-term protocol (CMIP). The MIB working group has produced two memos. RFC 1065 [2] defines the Structure of Management Information (SMI) that is necessary for naming and defining managed objects in the MIB. RFC 1066 [3] defines the list of managed objects contained in the initial TCP/IP MIB. The SNMP working group has produced a memo [4] giving the protocol specification for SNMP and providing the SNMP protocol-specific interpretation of the Internet-standard MIB defined in RFC 1066. This memo is the output of the Netman working group. As directed by the IAB in RFC 1052, it addresses the need for a long-term network management system based on ISO CMIS/CMIP. The network management approach of using ISO protocols in a TCP/IP environment to manage TCP/IP networks can be described as "CMIP Over TCP/IP" (CMOT). This memo specifies the CMOT architecture and the protocol agreementsWarrier & Besaw [Page 4]RFC 1095 CMOT April 1989 necessary to implement CMIP and accompanying ISO protocols over the TCP and UDP transport protocols. In addition, this memo provides an interpretation of RFC 1066 that makes it possible to use CMIP to convey management information defined in the Internet-standard MIB. There is widespread vendor support for the CMOT approach to network management. This is amply shown by the Netman demonstration of prototype CMOT implementations at the Interop '88 TCP/IP Interoperability Conference. The demonstration also showed the feasibility and power of the CMIS/CMIP framework for multivendor network management. Now that CMIS/CMIP has been voted a Draft International Standard (DIS), many vendors feel that the ISO standard has become a stable basis for product development. The clear need to standardize this development has led to the present profile of CMIP. It is expected that this profile will not change while the ISO standard moves from DIS status to International Standard (IS) status. If, however, the standard does change unexpectedly, the Netman working group will review such changes for appropriate action. Another rationale for the CMOT approach is that it will facilitate the early use of ISO network management standards in large operational networks. This will make it possible for the Internet community to make valuable recommendations to ISO in the language of OSI management based on actual experience with the use and implementation of these standards. There is continuing network management standards development work in ISO where such contributions would be valuable. The CMOT architecture is based on the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) management framework and models developed by ISO. This memo contains a set of protocol agreements for implementing a network management system based on this architecture. The protocol agreement sections of this memo must be read in conjunction with ISO and Internet documents defining specific protocol standards. Documents
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -