⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc2457.txt

📁 著名的RFC文档,其中有一些文档是已经翻译成中文的的.
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 4 页
字号:
Network Working Group                                        B. CloustonRequest for Comments: 2457                                 Cisco SystemsCategory: Standards Track                                       B. Moore                                                         IBM Corporation                                                           November 1998                     Definitions of Managed Objects                        for Extended Border NodeStatus of this Memo   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998).  All Rights Reserved.Abstract   This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)   for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.   In particular, it defines objects for monitoring and controlling   network devices with APPN (Advanced Peer-to-Peer Network) EBN   (Extended Border Node) capabilities.  This memo identifies managed   objects for the EBN architecture.Table of Contents   1.0  Introduction  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   2   2.0  The SNMP Network Management Framework   . . . . . . . . . .   2   3.0  Overview  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   3   3.1  EBN MIB Structure   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   4     3.1.1  enbDir group  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5     3.1.2  ebnIsRscv group   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5     3.1.3  ebnDirConfig group  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7     3.1.4  ebnCos group  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8     3.1.5  ebnSubnetRoutingList group  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8     3.1.6  hbn group   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   8   4.0  Definitions   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   9   5.0  Security Considerations   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  24   6.0  Intellectual Property   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  25   7.0  Acknowledgments   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  25   8.0  References  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  25Clouston & Moore            Standards Track                     [Page 1]RFC 2457                Extended Border Node MIB           November 1998   9.0  Authors' Addresses  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  27   10.0  Full Copyright Statement   . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  281.0 Introduction   This document is a product of the SNA NAU Services MIB Working Group.   It defines a MIB module for managing devices with Advanced Peer-to-   Peer Networking (APPN) Extended Border Node (EBN) capabilities.   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119, reference   [13].2.0 The SNMP Network Management Framework   The SNMP Network Management Framework presently consists of six major   components.  They are:   o   the overall architecture, described in RFC 2271 [7].   o   the SMI, described in RFC 1902 [3], - the mechanisms used for       describing and naming objects for the purpose of management.   o   the MIB-II, STD 17, RFC 1213 [2], - the core set of managed       objects for the Internet suite of protocols.   o   the protocol, STD 15, RFC 1157 [1] and/or RFC 1905 [6] and/or RFC       2272 [8] -- the protocol for accessing managed information.   o   the user-based security model defined in RFC 2274 [10].   o   the view-based access control model defined in RFC 2275 [11].   Textual conventions are defined in RFC 1903 [4], and conformance   statements are defined in RFC 1904 [5].  Common applications are   defined in RFC 2273 [9].   The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of   experimentation and evaluation.   This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2.  A   MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be produced through the appropriate   translation.Clouston & Moore            Standards Track                     [Page 2]RFC 2457                Extended Border Node MIB           November 19983.0 Overview   This document identifies the proposed set of objects for monitoring   the configuration and active characteristics of devices with EBN   capabilities.  The Extended Border Node function is an APPN   enhancement for an APPN network node (NN).  It supports topology   isolation, subnet interconnection, and session establishment between   subnets.   In a single APPN network, all network topology information is   propagated to all network nodes.  Directory searches can also be   forwarded to all network nodes.  As the network grows, this network   traffic could become prohibitive.  Also, in networks where different   enterprises are connected via APPN, it may be desirable to shield an   enterprise from the network traffic of another enterprise.  EBNs   allow customers to partition a network into subnets to reduce or   shield such network traffic.   An EBN provides this function by blocking topology information   exchange between subnets, and controlling where directory searches   are forwarded.  A subnetwork is a cluster of APPN NNs which share the   same network topology.  Subnetwork boundaries, or partitions, occur   where an EBN and an NN adjacent to it have different network   identifiers (NETIDs).  They may also occur where an EBN and adjacent   NN have the same NETID but are configured to have a subnetwork   boundary.   The connection between two APPN nodes is an APPN transmission group   (TG).  A TG at a subnet boundary is called an Intersubnetwork   Transmission Group (ISTG).   The subnet in which an EBN resides is called its native subnetwork.   The subnet across the subnet boundary is called the non-native   subnetwork, with respect to the EBN.   A cost of the EBN function is that customers may have difficulty   determining the end-to-end route of sessions that cross subnet   boundaries, and understanding how the EBN will control directory   searches between subnets.  This MIB addresses these issues.   Another challenge facing customers is to identify subnet boundaries   formed by EBNs.  The SNANAU APPN MIB [14] identifies subnet   boundaries in the appnNnTopology group.  The SNANAU APPN MIB provides   management of APPN objects, and contains some tables that are   extended by this MIB.   In this document, we describe EBN managed objects.Clouston & Moore            Standards Track                     [Page 3]RFC 2457                Extended Border Node MIB           November 1998   The EBN terms and overall architecture are available from the   networking.raleigh.ibm.com ftp site [15].   Highlights of the management functions supported by the EBN MIB   module include the following:   o   Identifying the subnet affiliation of LUs (logical units)   o   Identifying session routes in non-native subnets, with       correlation to the route in the native subnet provided in the       SNANAU APPN MIB.   o   Identifying the COS (Class of Service) mappings between subnets.   o   Identifying the subnet routing lists   This MIB module does not support:   o   Configuration of EBN nodes.   o   Historical information about session initiation failures.   o   Peripheral Border Node (PBN) support.  PBN is an APPN function       that only supports communication to adjacent subnetworks, and is       not expected to be widely implemented.   o   Traps.  The APPN MIB contains a trap for Alert conditions that       may affect EBN resources.  Although no APPN/EBN Alerts are       defined today in the APPN MIB [14], they could exist in the       future.  The value for the affectedObject object contained in the       alertTrap is determined by the implementation.  It may contain a       VariablePointer from the EBN MIB.3.1 EBN MIB Structure   The EBN MIB module contains the following groups of objects:   o   ebnDir - subnet information about LUs.   o   ebnIsRscv - provides the RSCV (Route Selection Control       Vector) and COS for the subnetwork on the BIND destination side       of the EBN.   o   ebnDirConfig - objects related to the EBN directory.   o   ebnCos - COS mapping between subnetworks,Clouston & Moore            Standards Track                     [Page 4]RFC 2457                Extended Border Node MIB           November 1998   o   ebnSubnetRoutingList - the customer-supplied list of where to       forward search requests.   o   hbn - HPR (High Performance Routing) EBN intermediate session       information.   These groups are described below in more detail.3.1.1 enbDir group   The ebnDir group contains the ebnDirTable, which is an extension to   the appnDirTable.  It specifies the subnet affiliation of LUs in the   EBN's directory.3.1.2 ebnIsRscv group   The ebnIsRscv group contains the ebnIsRscvTable, which is an   extension to the appnIsInTable.  The appnIsInTable only allows for   the RSCV and COS name for one subnetwork traversed by a session.   This extension contains the RSCV and COS name for the other   subnetwork.   When an EBN changes RSCVs before forwarding a BIND, appnIsInRouteInfo   contains the incoming RSCV, and ebnIsRscvDestinationRoute contains   the outgoing RSCV.   The following three cases illustrate the contents of   appnIsInRouteInfo and ebnIsRscvDestinationRoute at Extended Border   Nodes.   1.  EBN connected to another EBN          **subnet 1**|-----ISTG ------|**subnet 2**                     EBN1             EBN2          PLU                                    SLU          ---------------------------->|                (1)   |--------------->|                              (2)      |---------->                                            (3)          PLU = Primary Logical Unit (session initiator)          SLU = Secondary Logical Unit (session destination)       The value of the appnIsInRouteInfo object at EBN1 is the RSCV       containing the route, represented by (1), from the PLU (or the       entry EBN in its subnet) to EBN2.  The value of       ebnIsRscvDestinationRoute object at EBN1 is the RSCV, represented       by (2), containing the one-hop route from EBN1 to EBN2.  TheClouston & Moore            Standards Track                     [Page 5]RFC 2457                Extended Border Node MIB           November 1998       appnIsInRouteInfo object at EBN2 also contains the RSCV       represented by (2).  The value of ebnIsRscvDestinationRoute in       EBN2 is the RSVC containing the route to the SLU (or to the next       subnet's entry EBN), represented by (3).   2.  EBN connected to a NN or PBN          **subnet 1**|-----ISTG ------|**subnet 2**                     EBN1            NN/PBN          PLU                                    SLU          ---------------------------->|              (1)     |--------------------------->                                   (2)       The value of the appnIsInRouteInfo object at EBN1 is the RSCV       containing the route from the PLU (or the entry EBN in its       subnet) to the NN or PBN, represented by (1).  The value of the       ebnIsRscvDestinationRoute object at EBN1 is the RSCV containing       the route from EBN1 to the SLU, represented by (2).  Note that       the SLU must be in subnet 2, because the entry node is an NN or       PBN rather than an EBN.  The appnIsInRouteInfo object at NN/PBN       contains the same RSCV, as represented by (2).   3.  NN or PBN connected to EBN          **subnet 1**|-----ISTG ------|**subnet 2**                    NN/PBN            EBN1          PLU                                    SLU          ---------------------------->|                    (1)                |---------->                                            (2)       The value of the appnIsInRouteInfo object at the NN/PBN is the       RSCV containing the route from the PLU to EBN1, represented by       (1).  Note that the PLU must be in subnet 1, because the exit       node is an NN/PBN rather than an EBN.  The appnIsInRouteInfo       object at EBN1 contains the same RSCV.  The value of the       ebnIsRscvDestinationRoute object at EBN1 is the RSCV containing       the route from EBN1 to the SLU (or the next subnet's entry border       node), as represented by (2).   The following three cases illustrate the contents of   ebnIsRscvDestinationCos at Extended Border Nodes.Clouston & Moore            Standards Track                     [Page 6]RFC 2457                Extended Border Node MIB           November 1998   1.  EBN connected to another EBN          **subnet 1**|-----ISTG ------|**subnet 2**                     EBN1             EBN2          PLU                                    SLU                 COS A          ---------------------------->|                                          COS B                                       |---------->          PLU = Primary Logical Unit (session initiator)          SLU = Secondary Logical Unit (session destination)       The value of ebnIsRscvDestinationCos object at EBN1 is COS A.       The value of ebnIsRscvDestinationCos object at EBN2 is COS B.   2.   EBN connected to a NN or PBN          **subnet 1**|-----ISTG ------|**subnet 2**                     EBN1            NN/PBN          PLU                                    SLU                 COS A          ----------->|                                     COS B                      |--------------------------->       The value of the ebvIsRscvDestinationCos object at EBN1 is COS B.   3.  NN or PBN connected to EBN          **subnet 1**|-----ISTG ------|**subnet 2**                    NN/PBN            EBN1          PLU                                    SLU                 COS A          ---------------------------->|                                           COS B                                       |---------->       The value of the ebnIsRscvDestinationCos object at the EBN2 is       COSB.3.1.3 ebnDirConfig group   The ebnDirConfig group consists of simple objects that provide EBN-   specific information about directory caching and the local default   value for the maximum number of subnetworks a LOCATE search procedure   may traverse.

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -