rfc1091.txt

著名的RFC文档,其中有一些文档是已经翻译成中文的的.

Network Working Group                                  J. VanBokkelen
Request for Comments: 1091                         FTP Software, Inc.
Obsoletes: RFC 930                                      February 1989


                      Telnet Terminal-Type Option

Status of This Memo

   This RFC specifies a standard for the Internet community.  Hosts on
   the Internet that exchange terminal type information within the
   Telnet protocol are expected to adopt and implement this standard.

   This standard supersedes RFC 930.  A change is made to permit cycling
   through a list of possible terminal types and selecting the most
   appropriate.

   Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

1. Command Name and Code

      TERMINAL-TYPE   24

2. Command Meanings

      IAC WILL TERMINAL-TYPE

         Sender is willing to send terminal type information in a
         subsequent sub-negotiation.

      IAC WON'T TERMINAL-TYPE

         Sender refuses to send terminal type information.

      IAC DO TERMINAL-TYPE

         Sender is willing to receive terminal type information in a
         subsequent sub-negotiation.

      IAC DON'T TERMINAL-TYPE

         Sender refuses to accept terminal type information.









VanBokkelen                                                     [Page 1]

RFC 1091              Telnet Terminal-Type Option          February 1989


      IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE

         Server requests client to transmit his (the client's) next
         terminal type, and switch emulation modes (if more than one
         terminal type is supported).  The code for SEND is 1. (See
         below.)

      IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS ... IAC SE

         Client is stating the name of his current (or only) terminal
         type.  The code for IS is 0.  (See below.)

3. Default

      WON'T TERMINAL-TYPE

         Terminal type information will not be exchanged.

      DON'T TERMINAL-TYPE

         Terminal type information will not be exchanged.

4. Motivation for the Option

   On most machines with bit-mapped displays (e.g., PCs and graphics
   workstations) a client terminal emulation program is used to simulate
   a conventional ASCII terminal.  Most of these programs have multiple
   emulation modes, frequently with widely varying characteristics.
   Likewise, modern host system software and applications can deal with
   a variety of terminal types.  What is needed is a means for the
   client to present a list of available terminal emulation modes to the
   server, from which the server can select the one it prefers (for
   arbitrary reasons).  There is also need for a mechanism to change
   emulation modes during the course of a session, perhaps according to
   the needs of applications programs.

   Existing terminal-type passing mechanisms within Telnet were not
   designed with multiple emulation modes in mind.  While multiple names
   are allowed, they are assumed to be synonyms.  Emulation mode changes
   are not defined, and the list of modes can only be scanned once.

   This document defines a simple extension to the existing mechanisms,
   which meets both of the above criteria.  It makes one assumption
   about the behaviour of implementations coded to the previous standard
   in order to obtain full backwards-compatibility.






VanBokkelen                                                     [Page 2]

RFC 1091              Telnet Terminal-Type Option          February 1989


5. Description of the Option

   Willingness to exchange terminal-type information is agreed upon via
   conventional Telnet option negotiation.  WILL and DO are used only to
   obtain and grant permission for future discussion.  The actual
   exchange of status information occurs within option subcommands (IAC
   SB TERMINAL-TYPE...).

   Once the two hosts have exchanged a WILL and a DO, the sender of the
   DO TERMINAL-TYPE (the server) is free to request type information.
   Only the server may send requests (IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE)
   and only the client may transmit actual type information (within an
   IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS ... IAC SE command).  Terminal type
   information may not be sent spontaneously, but only in response to a
   request.

   The terminal type information is an NVT ASCII string.  Within this
   string, upper and lower case are considered equivalent.  The complete
   list of valid terminal type names can be found in the latest
   "Assigned Numbers" RFC [4].

   The transmission of terminal type information by the Telnet client in
   response to a query from the Telnet server implies that the client
   must simultaneously change emulation mode, unless the terminal type
   sent is a synonym of the preceding terminal type, or there are other
   prerequisites for entering the new regime (e.g., having agreed upon
   the Telnet binary option).  The receipt of such information by the
   Telnet server does not imply any immediate change of processing.
   However, the information may be passed to a process, which may alter
   the data it sends to suit the particular characteristics of the
   terminal.  For example, some operating systems have a terminal driver
   that accepts a code indicating the type of terminal being driven.
   Using the TERMINAL TYPE and BINARY options, a telnet server program
   on such a system could arrange to have terminals driven as if they
   were directly connected, including special functions not available to
   a standard Network Virtual Terminal.

   Note that this specification is deliberately asymmetric.  It is
   assumed that server operating systems and applications in general
   cannot change terminal types at arbitrary points in a session.  Thus,
   the client may only send a new type (and potentially change emulation
   modes) when the server requests that it do so.

6.  Implementation Issues

   The "terminal type" information may be any NVT ASCII string
   meaningful to both ends of the negotiation.  The list of terminal
   type names in "Assigned Numbers" is intended to minimize confusion



VanBokkelen                                                     [Page 3]

RFC 1091              Telnet Terminal-Type Option          February 1989


   caused by alternative "spellings" of the terminal type.  For example,
   confusion would arise if one party were to call a terminal "IBM3278-
   2" while the other called it "IBM-3278/2".  There is no negative
   acknowledgement for a terminal type that is not understood, but
   certain other options (such as switching to BINARY mode) may be
   refused if a valid terminal type name has not been specified.

   In some cases, either a particular terminal may be known by more than
   one name, for example a specific type and a more generic type, or the
   client may be a workstation with integrated display capable of
   emulating more than one kind of terminal.  In such cases, the sender
   of the TERMINAL-TYPE IS command should reply to successive TERMINAL-
   TYPE SEND commands with the various names.  In this way, a telnet
   server that does not understand the first response can prompt for
   alternatives.  If different terminal emulations are supported by the
   client, the mode of the emulator must be changed to match the last
   type sent, unless the particular emulation has other Telnet options
   (e.g., BINARY) as prerequisites (in which case, the emulation will
   switch to the last type sent when the prerequisite is fulfilled).
   When types are synonyms, they should be sent in order from most to
   least specific.

   When the server (the receiver of the TERMINAL-TYPE IS) receives the
   same response two consecutive times, this indicates the end of the
   list of available types.  Similarly, the client should indicate it
   has sent all available names by repeating the last one sent.  If an
   additional request is received, this indicates that the server (the
   sender of the IS) wishes to return to the top of the list of
   available types (probably to select the least of N evils).

   Server implementations conforming to the previous standard will cease
   sending TERMINAL-TYPE SEND commands after receiving the same response
   two consecutive times, which will work according to the old standard.
   It is assumed that client implementations conforming to the previous
   standard will send the last type on the list in response to a third
   query (as well as the second).  New-style servers must recognize this
   and not send more queries.

   The type "UNKNOWN" should be used if the type of the terminal is
   unknown or unlikely to be recognized by the other party.

   The complete and up-to-date list of terminal type names will be
   maintained in the "Assigned Numbers".  The maximum length of a
   terminal type name is 40 characters.

7. User Interfaces

   Telnet clients and servers conforming to this specification should



VanBokkelen                                                     [Page 4]

RFC 1091              Telnet Terminal-Type Option          February 1989


   provide the following functions in their user interfaces:

   Clients supporting multiple emulation modes should allow the user to
   specify which of the modes is preferred (which name is sent first),
   prior to connection establishment.  The order of the names sent
   cannot be changed after the negotiation has begun.  This initial mode
   will also become the default with servers which do not support
   TERMINAL TYPE.

   Servers should store the current terminal type name and the list of
   available names in a manner such that they are accessible to both the
   user (via a keyboard command) and any applications which need the
   information.  In addition, there should be a corresponding mechanism
   to request a change of terminal types, by initiating a series of
   SEND/IS sub-negotiations.

8. Examples

   In this example, the server finds the first type acceptable.

      Server: IAC DO TERMINAL-TYPE

      Client: IAC WILL TERMINAL-TYPE

         (Server may now request a terminal type at any time.)

      Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE

      Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS IBM-3278-2 IAC SE

   In this example, the server requests additional terminal types, and
   accepts the second (and last on the client's list) type sent (RFC 930
   compatible):

      Server: IAC DO TERMINAL-TYPE

      Client: IAC WILL TERMINAL-TYPE

         (Server may now request a terminal type at any time.)

      Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE

      Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS ZENITH-H19 IAC SE

      Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE

      Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS UNKNOWN IAC SE




VanBokkelen                                                     [Page 5]

RFC 1091              Telnet Terminal-Type Option          February 1989


      Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE

      Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS UNKNOWN IAC SE

   In this example, the server requests additional terminal types, and
   proceeds beyond the end-of-list, to select the first type offered by
   the client (new-type client and server):

      Server: IAC DO TERMINAL-TYPE

      Client: IAC WILL TERMINAL-TYPE

         (Server may now request a terminal type at any time.)

      Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE

      Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS DEC-VT220 IAC SE

      Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE

      Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS DEC-VT100 IAC SE

      Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE

      Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS DEC-VT52 IAC SE

      Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE

      Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS DEC-VT52 IAC SE

      Server: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE SEND IAC SE

      Client: IAC SB TERMINAL-TYPE IS DEC-VT220 IAC SE

9. References:

     [1]  Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Protocol Specification",
          RFC 854, USC Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.

     [2]  Postel, J., and J. Reynolds, "Telnet Option Specification",
          RFC 855, USC Information Sciences Institute, May 1983.

     [3]  Solomon, M., and E. Wimmers, "Telnet Terminal Type Option",
          RFC 930, University of Wisconsin - Madison, January 1985.

     [4]  Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", RFC 1010,
          USC Information Sciences Institute, May 1987.




VanBokkelen                                                     [Page 6]

RFC 1091              Telnet Terminal-Type Option          February 1989


Reviser's note:

   I owe much of this text to RFCs 884 and 930, by Marvin Solomon and
   Edward Wimmers of the University of Wisconsin - Madison, and I owe
   the idea of the extension to discussions on the "tn3270" mailing list
   in the Summer of 1987.

Author's Address

   James VanBokkelen
   FTP Software, Inc.
   26 Princess Street
   Wakefield, MA 01880-3004

   Phone: [phone]

   Email: [e-mail]


































VanBokkelen                                                     [Page 7]