⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc2886.txt

📁 著名的RFC文档,其中有一些文档是已经翻译成中文的的.
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 3 页
字号:
Network Working Group                                          T. TaylorRequest for Comments: 2886                               Nortel NetworksCategory: Standards Track                                    August 2000                             Megaco ErrataStatus of this Memo   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2000).  All Rights Reserved.1. Abstract   This document records the errors found in the Megaco/H.248 protocol   document [2], along with the changes proposed in the text of that   document to resolve them.2. Conventions used in this document   The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",   "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED",  "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this   document are to be interpreted as described in RFC-2119 [1].3. Errata   All section numbers are those of the relevant text of [2].   Section: 2 "References"   ----------   Editorial: Add missing references to I.363.5 (AAL5) and RFC 1661   (PPP).   Editorial: delete unused reference to Q.724.   Editorial: Leave Recommendations referred to in Annex C undated,   implying latest issue.   Editorial: add reference to RFC 2805, the Megaco requirements   document.Taylor                      Standards Track                     [Page 1]RFC 2886                     Megaco Errata                   August 2000   Section: 4 "Abbreviations"   ----------   Editorial: delete unused abbreviation BRI.   Editorial: add explanations for GSM and IVR.   Section: 6.2.2 "TerminationIDs"   ----------   Issue: Not clear what wildcard union responses look like.   Resolution: Add the following text:    "ie. Given termination Ta with properties p1=a, p2=b, and   termination Tb with properties p2=c, p3=d a UNION   response would be T* p1=a, p2=b,c, p3=d."   Section: 6.2.4 "Termination Properties and descriptors"   ----------   Issue: Says that property values set in Null context are remembered   and reinstated when termination returns to Null.  Contradicts latest   text in 7.2.3.   Resolution: Rewrite the first paragraph from the third sentence   onward, to read:  "Most properties have default values, which are   explicitly defined in this standard  or in a package (see Section 12)   or set by provisioning.  If not provisioned otherwise, all   descriptors except for TerminationState and LocalControl default to   empty/"no value" when a termination is first created or is returned   to the null context.  The default contents of the two exceptions are   described in sections 7.1.5 and 7.1.7."   Issue: DigitMap entry in table makes explicit reference to DTMF   tones, but is also intended to apply to other in-band signalling   systems.   Resolution: Change existing text to new one as follows: "Defines   patterns against which sequences of a specified set of events are to   be matched so they can be reported as a group rather than singly."   Section: 6.2.5 "Root Termination"   ----------   Issue: Root can have statistics as well as properties and events.   Resolution: add "statistics" to the fourth sentence of the first   paragraph, listing what is valid for Root.  Add "statistics" to what   AuditValue can return for Root.Taylor                      Standards Track                     [Page 2]RFC 2886                     Megaco Errata                   August 2000   Section: 7.1 "Descriptors"   ----------   Issue: it is unclear how to express empty descriptors in responses to   the MGC.   Proposed resolution: In section 7.1, add the following text after the   sentence: "Descriptors may be returned as output from a command.":   "In any such return of descriptor contents, an empty descriptor is   represented by its name unaccompanied by any list."   In the ASN.1, add the following choice to the AuditReturnParameter   production:     "emptyDescriptors               AuditDescriptor,"   In the ABNF, add the choice auditItem to the production   auditReturnParameter.   Section: 7.1.1 "Specifying Parameters"   ----------   Issue: Third paragraph (discussing unspecified parameters): not clear   which parameters are mandatory.   Resolution: Replace the first two sentences (each beginning with the   word "unspecified") with the following text:  "If a required   descriptor other than the Audit descriptor is unspecified (i.e.   entirely absent) from a command, the previous values set in that   descriptor for that termination, if any, are retained.  A missing   Audit descriptor is equivalent to an empty Audit descriptor.  The   behaviour of the MG with respect to unspecified parameters within a   descriptor varies with the descriptor concerned, as indicated in   succeeding sections."   Section: 7.1.6 "Stream Descriptor", ABNF (Annex B.2)   ----------   Issue: Text indicates use of "true" and "false" values while ABNF   uses "on" and "off"   Resolution: Add comment in B.2 that "true" in text corresponds to   "on" in ABNF, and "false" corresponds to "off".Taylor                      Standards Track                     [Page 3]RFC 2886                     Megaco Errata                   August 2000   Section: 7.1.8 "Local and Remote Descriptors"   ----------   Issue: case where reserveGroup or reserveValue is true, last bulleted   item beginning: "If the Mode property of the LocalControl descriptor   is RecvOnly or SendRecv,...", could also have DSP involvement in the   case of loopback mode.   Resolution: Add "loopback".   Section: 7.1.9 "Events Descriptor"   ----------   Issue: EventDM is part of syntax but not mentioned in section.   Resolution: Add text: "If a digit map completion event is present or   implied in the EventsDescriptor, EventDM is used to carry either the   name or the value of the associated digit map. See section 7.1.14."   Issue: Not clear whether events trigger side effects (e.g. signal   termination) at time of detection, at time of processing (whether or   not in active Events Descriptor) or at time of notification.  Also,   the third paragraph of the section fails to mention these side   effects and limits MG action to notification.   Resolution: Modify the third paragraph of the section, so that it   reads:  "When an event (either newly detected or buffered) is   processed against the contents of an active Events descriptor and   found to be present in that descriptor ("recognized"), the default   action of the MG is to send a Notify command to the MG.  Notification   may be deferred if the event is absorbed into the current dial string   of an active digit map (see section 7.1.14).  Any other action is for   further study.  Moreover, event recognition may cause currently   active signals to stop, or may cause the current Events and/or   Signals descriptor to be replaced, as described at the end of this   section."   Replace "detection" with "recognition" in the fourth paragraph from   the end, so that it reads:  "Normally, recognition of an event shall   cause any active signals to stop.  When KeepActive is specified in   the event, the MG shall not interrupt any signals active on the   Termination on which the event is detected."   In the third-last paragraph, replace all three instances of   "detected" with "recognized".   Leave the word "detected" as is in the final paragraph.Taylor                      Standards Track                     [Page 4]RFC 2886                     Megaco Errata                   August 2000   Issue: Case 1, step 2(a) is incorrectly formulated.  Existing logic   may result in an infinite loop.  Also, the step excludes side effect   actions such as signal termination.   Resolution: Modify step 2(a) to read:  "If the event in the queue is   in the events listed in the new EventsDescriptor, the MG acts on the   event and removes it from the EventBuffer.  The time stamp of the   Notify shall be the time the event was actually detected.  The MG   then waits for a new EventsDescriptor.  While waiting for a new   EventsDescriptor, any events detected which appear in the current   EventsBufferDescriptor will be placed in the EventBuffer.  When a new   EventDescriptor is received, event processing repeats from step 1."   Section: 7.1.11 "Signals Descriptor"   ----------   Issue: There is a need for the MGC to be aware of signalling   failures.  It is not possible to use the signal completion event to   monitor for signalling failures only, without also having to process   successes.   Proposed Resolution: In section 7.1.11, replace the current text on   completion notification, beginning: "Finally, the optional parameter   "notifyCompletion" ..." and continuing to the end of the paragraph   with the following text:   "Finally, the optional parameter "notifyCompletion" allows a MGC to   indicate the circumstances under which it wishes to be notified when   the signal finishes playout.  The possible cases are that the signal   timed out, that it was interrupted by an event, that it was halted   when a Signals descriptor was replaced, or that it stopped or never   started for other reasons.  If "notifyCompletion" is absent,   notification is generated in the "other reasons" case only.  For   reporting to occur the signal completion event (see section E.1.2)   must be enabled in the currently active Events descriptor."   In Annex A.2, make notifyCompletion a BIT STRING with the four cases.   In B.2, make it a parameter consisting of a name and a list of values   representing the possible completion methods.   Section: 7.1.13 "ServiceChange Descriptor"   ----------   Issue: Missing "extension" component in the API.   Resolution: Add missing component.Taylor                      Standards Track                     [Page 5]RFC 2886                     Megaco Errata                   August 2000   Section: 7.1.14 "DigitMap Descriptor"   ----------   Editorial: add the following subsections.   7.1.14.1 DigitMap definition, creation, modification and termination   (before first paragraph)   7.1.14.2 DigitMap Timers (after the first bullet list)   7.1.14.3 DigitMap syntax (before the long paragraph starting "The   formal syntax of the digit map [...]")   7.1.14.4 DigitMap completion event (before the paragraph starting "A   digit map is active while the events descriptor [...]")   7.1.14.5 DigitMap procedures (before the sentence "Pending   completion, successive events shall be processed [...]", preceding   the numbered list)   7.1.14.6 DigitMap activation (after the numbered list)   7.1.14.7 Interaction of DigitMap and event processing (before the   next paragraph, starting "While the digit map is activated, [...]")   7.1.14.8 Wildcards (before the the next paragraph, starting "Note   that if a package contains [...]")   7.1.14.9 Example (before the example)   Issue: incorrect statements regarding the interaction of the dot   symbol with default timing rules.   Resolution: last sentence of the paragraph beginning "The letter "x"   is used as a wildcard, ..." should be modified to read:  "As a   consequence of the third timing rule above, inter-event timing while   matching a terminal dot symbol uses the short timer by default."  In   the next paragraph, the third sentence, which begins:  "A timer   specifier following a dot ...", should be deleted.   Issue: Step 5 in second numbered list  understates conditions for   digit map completion when single candidate remains.   Resolution: Add the words "and it has been fully matched" to the   existing sentence.  Also remove the parenthetical remark:  "...   (because the candidate set still contains more than one alternative   event sequence)" from step 6.Taylor                      Standards Track                     [Page 6]RFC 2886                     Megaco Errata                   August 2000   Issue: Not clear when unmatched events are recognized and trigger   side effects (e.g. signal termination).   Resolution:  Modify the final sentence of the paragraph following   procedural step 6 to read as follows:  "Normal event behaviour (e.g.   stopping of signals unless the digit completion event has the   KeepActive flag enabled) continues to apply for each such event   detected, except that     . the events in the package containing the specified digit map       completion event other than the completion event itself are not       individually notified, and     . an event which triggers a "partial match" completion is not       recognized and therefore has no side effects until reprocessed       following the recognition of the digit map completion event."   Issue: the last paragraph before the example is misleading if the   package containing the digit map completion event is different from   the package containing the actual digits.   Resolution: qualify the second sentence of the paragraph as follows:   "Regardless of whether a digit map is activated, if the package also   contains the digit events themselves, this form of event   specification ...".   Section: 7.1.18 "Topology Descriptor"   ----------   Issue: Third bullet attached to third para: says loopback achieved by   manipulating TerminationMode, which no longer has that name.   Resolution: Delete the clause "; loopbacks are created by setting the   TerminationMode"   Section: 7.2   ----------   Issue: The order in which descriptors are processed within a command   matters, but is not clear.  Moreover, it is fixed in the ASN.1 but   variable in the ABNF.   Resolution: Add text stating that descriptors are processed in the   order in which they are provided.  Change ASN.1 in Annex A.2 to allow   the MGC to specify ordering:Taylor                      Standards Track                     [Page 7]

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -