⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc2347.txt

📁 著名的RFC文档,其中有一些文档是已经翻译成中文的的.
💻 TXT
字号:
Network Working Group                                          G. MalkinRequest for Commments: 2347                                 Bay NetworksUpdates: 1350                                                  A. HarkinObsoletes: 1782                                      Hewlett Packard Co.Category: Standards Track                                       May 1998                         TFTP Option ExtensionStatus of this Memo   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Copyright Notice   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998).  All Rights Reserved.Abstract   The Trivial File Transfer Protocol [1] is a simple, lock-step, file   transfer protocol which allows a client to get or put a file onto a   remote host.  This document describes a simple extension to TFTP to   allow option negotiation prior to the file transfer.Introduction   The option negotiation mechanism proposed in this document is a   backward-compatible extension to the TFTP protocol.  It allows file   transfer options to be negotiated prior to the transfer using a   mechanism which is consistent with TFTP's Request Packet format.  The   mechanism is kept simple by enforcing a request-respond-acknowledge   sequence, similar to the lock-step approach taken by TFTP itself.   While the option negotiation mechanism is general purpose, in that   many types of options may be negotiated, it was created to support   the Blocksize option defined in [2].  Additional options are defined   in [3].Packet Formats   TFTP options are appended to the Read Request and Write Request   packets.  A new type of TFTP packet, the Option Acknowledgment   (OACK), is used to acknowledge a client's option negotiation request.   A new error code, 8, is hereby defined to indicate that a transferMalkin & Harkin             Standards Track                     [Page 1]RFC 2347                 TFTP Option Extension                  May 1998   should be terminated due to option negotiation.   Options are appended to a TFTP Read Request or Write Request packet   as follows:      +-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+-->      |  opc  |filename| 0 |  mode  | 0 |  opt1  | 0 | value1 | 0 | <      +-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+-->       >-------+---+---~~---+---+      <  optN  | 0 | valueN | 0 |       >-------+---+---~~---+---+      opc         The opcode field contains either a 1, for Read Requests, or 2,         for Write Requests, as defined in [1].      filename         The name of the file to be read or written, as defined in [1].         This is a NULL-terminated field.      mode         The mode of the file transfer: "netascii", "octet", or "mail",         as defined in [1].  This is a NULL-terminated field.      opt1         The first option, in case-insensitive ASCII (e.g., blksize).         This is a NULL-terminated field.      value1         The value associated with the first option, in case-         insensitive ASCII.  This is a NULL-terminated field.      optN, valueN         The final option/value pair.  Each NULL-terminated field is         specified in case-insensitive ASCII.   The options and values are all NULL-terminated, in keeping with the   original request format.  If multiple options are to be negotiated,   they are appended to each other.  The order in which options are   specified is not significant.  The maximum size of a request packet   is 512 octets.   The OACK packet has the following format:Malkin & Harkin             Standards Track                     [Page 2]RFC 2347                 TFTP Option Extension                  May 1998      +-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+      |  opc  |  opt1  | 0 | value1 | 0 |  optN  | 0 | valueN | 0 |      +-------+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+---~~---+---+      opc         The opcode field contains a 6, for Option Acknowledgment.      opt1         The first option acknowledgment, copied from the original         request.      value1         The acknowledged value associated with the first option.  If         and how this value may differ from the original request is         detailed in the specification for the option.      optN, valueN         The final option/value acknowledgment pair.Negotiation Protocol   The client appends options at the end of the Read Request or Write   request packet, as shown above.  Any number of options may be   specified; however, an option may only be specified once.  The order   of the options is not significant.   If the server supports option negotiation, and it recognizes one or   more of the options specified in the request packet, the server may   respond with an Options Acknowledgment (OACK).  Each option the   server recognizes, and accepts the value for, is included in the   OACK.  Some options may allow alternate values to be proposed, but   this is an option specific feature.  The server must not include in   the OACK any option which had not been specifically requested by the   client; that is, only the client may initiate option negotiation.   Options which the server does not support should be omitted from the   OACK; they should not cause an ERROR packet to be generated.  If the   value of a supported option is invalid, the specification for that   option will indicate whether the server should simply omit the option   from the OACK, respond with an alternate value, or send an ERROR   packet, with error code 8, to terminate the transfer.   An option not acknowledged by the server must be ignored by the   client and server as if it were never requested.  If multiple options   were requested, the client must use those options which were   acknowledged by the server and must not use those options which were   not acknowledged by the server.Malkin & Harkin             Standards Track                     [Page 3]RFC 2347                 TFTP Option Extension                  May 1998   When the client appends options to the end of a Read Request packet,   three possible responses may be returned by the server:      OACK  - acknowledge of Read Request and the options;      DATA  - acknowledge of Read Request, but not the options;      ERROR - the request has been denied.   When the client appends options to the end of a Write Request packet,   three possible responses may be returned by the server:      OACK  - acknowledge of Write Request and the options;      ACK   - acknowledge of Write Request, but not the options;      ERROR - the request has been denied.   If a server implementation does not support option negotiation, it   will likely ignore any options appended to the client's request.  In   this case, the server will return a DATA packet for a Read Request   and an ACK packet for a Write Request establishing normal TFTP data   transfer.  In the event that a server returns an error for a request   which carries an option, the client may attempt to repeat the request   without appending any options.  This implementation option would   handle servers which consider extraneous data in the request packet   to be erroneous.   Depending on the original transfer request there are two ways for a   client to confirm acceptance of a server's OACK.  If the transfer was   initiated with a Read Request, then an ACK (with the data block   number set to 0) is sent by the client to confirm the values in the   server's OACK packet.  If the transfer was initiated with a Write   Request, then the client begins the transfer with the first DATA   packet, using the negotiated values.  If the client rejects the OACK,   then it sends an ERROR packet, with error code 8, to the server and   the transfer is terminated.   Once a client acknowledges an OACK, with an appropriate non-error   response, that client has agreed to use only the options and values   returned by the server.  Remember that the server cannot request an   option; it can only respond to them.  If the client receives an OACK   containing an unrequested option, it should respond with an ERROR   packet, with error code 8, and terminate the transfer.Malkin & Harkin             Standards Track                     [Page 4]RFC 2347                 TFTP Option Extension                  May 1998Examples   Read Request      client                                           server      -------------------------------------------------------      |1|foofile|0|octet|0|blksize|0|1432|0|  -->               RRQ                                    <--  |6|blksize|0|1432|0|   OACK      |4|0|  -->                                                ACK                             <--  |3|1| 1432 octets of data |   DATA      |4|1|  -->                                                ACK                             <--  |3|2| 1432 octets of data |   DATA      |4|2|  -->                                                ACK                             <--  |3|3|<1432 octets of data |   DATA      |4|3|  -->                                                ACK   Write Request      client                                           server      -------------------------------------------------------      |2|barfile|0|octet|0|blksize|0|2048|0|  -->               RRQ                                    <--  |6|blksize|0|2048|0|   OACK      |3|1| 2048 octets of data |  -->                          DATA                                                   <--  |4|1|   ACK      |3|2| 2048 octets of data |  -->                          DATA                                                   <--  |4|2|   ACK      |3|3|<2048 octets of data |  -->                          DATA                                                      <--  |4|3|   ACKSecurity Considerations   The basic TFTP protocol has no security mechanism.  This is why it   has no rename, delete, or file overwrite capabilities.  This document   does not add any security to TFTP; however, the specified extensions   do not add any additional security risks.References   [1] Sollins, K., "The TFTP Protocol (Revision 2)", STD 33, RFC 1350,       October 1992.   [2] Malkin, G., and A. Harkin, "TFTP Blocksize Option", RFC 2348,       May 1998.   [3] Malkin, G., and A. Harkin, "TFTP Timeout Interval and Transfer       Size Options", RFC 2349, May 1998.Malkin & Harkin             Standards Track                     [Page 5]RFC 2347                 TFTP Option Extension                  May 1998Authors' Addresses   Gary Scott Malkin   Bay Networks   8 Federal Street   Billerica, MA  01821   Phone:  (978) 916-4237   EMail:  gmalkin@baynetworks.com   Art Harkin   Internet Services Project   Information Networks Division   19420 Homestead Road MS 43LN   Cupertino, CA  95014   Phone: (408) 447-3755   EMail: ash@cup.hp.comMalkin & Harkin             Standards Track                     [Page 6]RFC 2347                 TFTP Option Extension                  May 1998Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998).  All Rights Reserved.   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than   English.   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Malkin & Harkin             Standards Track                     [Page 7]

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -