⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc2097.txt

📁 著名的RFC文档,其中有一些文档是已经翻译成中文的的.
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 2 页
字号:
   |   1st NetBIOS-Name (cont.)    |    Added      |2nd NetBIOS Name...   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   Type      1   Length      2 + (Number of NetBIOS names * 17)   NetBIOS-Names      This group of zero or more sixteen octet NetBIOS-Name fields      contains a list of all the NetBIOS names the peer wishes to add to      the remote network if the packet is Configure-Request.  If the      packet is Configure-Reject, the peer does not support this      configuration option and it can be assumed that no NetBIOS names      were added.      Because the length field is only one octet, only 14 NetBIOS names      can be added per Name-Projection option.  If more than 14 NetBIOS      names should be added, then more than one Name-Projection option      packet will have to be sent in the Configure-Request packet.Pall                        Standards Track                     [Page 7]RFC 2097                         NBFCP                      January 1997   Added      This is a one octet field which plays a dual role.  The Added      field in the Name-Projection Request packet contains the type of      NetBIOS name added.  A summary of name types is listed below.         01   Unique Name.         02   Group Name.      If the packet is a Configure-Reject the Added field should contain      the NetBIOS return code for the NetBIOS Add Name or NetBIOS Add      Group Name command as defined in the NetBIOS 3.0 specification =      [3].   A summary of common result codes is listed below in type hex.         00   Name successfully added.         0D   Duplicate name in local name table.         0E   Name table full.         15   Name not found or cannot specify "*" or null.         16   Name in use on remote NetBIOS.         19   Name conflict detected.         30   Name defined by another environment.         35   Required system resources exhausted.3.2.  Peer-Information   Description      This Configuration Option provides a way for the peer to      communicate NetBIOS pertinent configuration information. Although      negotiation of this option is not mandatory, it is suggested.   A summary of the Peer-Information Option format is shown below.  The   fields are transmitted from left to right.    0                   1                   2                   3    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |     Type      |    Length     |         Peer-class            |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |        Peer-version (major)   |       Peer-version(minor)    |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |        Peer-name ....   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+Pall                        Standards Track                     [Page 8]RFC 2097                         NBFCP                      January 1997   Type      2   Length      >=3D8      If the length is 8, there is no Peer-name.  If the length is      greater than 8, the Peer-name's length is Length - 8.   Peer-class      The Peer-class field is one octet. It identifies the sender's      implementation type.      Initial values are assigned as follows:      Value           Class        1             Reserved for legacy implementations.        2             PPP NetBIOS Gateway Server.        3             Reserved for legacy implementations.        4             PPP Local Access Only Server.        5             Reserved for legacy implementations.        6             PPP NBF Bridge.        7             Reserved for legacy implementations.        8             PPP End-System.   Peer-version      The Peer-version field is four octets and indicates the version of      the communication peer providing one side of the PPP connection.      The first two octets are the major version number and the last two      octets are the minor version number.  The major and minor version      represent a 16 bit unsigned number sent with the most significant      octet first.   Peer-name      The name of the peer.  A suggested name is the NetBIOS workstation      name of the peer.  If the length field is 8, no peer name is      provided.  The peer-name may not be greater than 32 octets in      length.Pall                        Standards Track                     [Page 9]RFC 2097                         NBFCP                      January 19973.3.  Multicast-Filtering   Description      This Configuration Option provides a way to negotiate the use of      the Multicast-Forward-Period and the Multicast-Priority.  This      Configuration Option provides a way to negotiate how to handle      mulicast packets.  It allows the sender of the Configure-Request      to state the current handling of multicast packets.  The peer can      request parameters by NAKing the option, and returning valid      Multicast-Filtering parameters.      If negotiation about the remote Multicast-Filtering is required,      and the peer did not provide the option in its Configure-Request,      the option SHOULD be appended to a Configure-Nak.      Controlling the multicast rate is important because some NetBIOS      applications use multicasts to communicate and withholding      multicasts may prevent these applications from working.  It is      also true that other NetBIOS applications do not need to receive      any multicast packets and therefore it is best to quench the rate      at which the peer will send multicast packets.      By default, the peer is pre-configured to an administrator      assigned Multicast-Forward-Period and Priority.  A Multicast-      Forward-Period specified as hex type FFFF in a Configure-Request      is interpreted as requesting the receiving peer to specify a value      in its Configure-Nak.  A Multicast-Forward-Period value specified      as hex type FFFF in a Configure-Nak is interpreted as agreement      that no value exists. A Multicast-Forward-Period of zero indicates      that all multicast packets SHOULD be forwarded.      Peers that rely on all multicast packets being forwarded SHOULD      request a Multicast-Forward-Period of zero and a Multicast-      Priority of one by NAKing the Configure-Request option and      appending the proper parameters to a Configure-Nak.   A summary of the Multicast-Filtering Configuration Option format is   shown below.  The fields are transmitted from left to right.    0                   1                   2                   3    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |     Type      |    Length     |    Multicast-Forward-Period   |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |   Priority    |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+Pall                        Standards Track                    [Page 10]RFC 2097                         NBFCP                      January 1997   Type      3   Length      5   Multicast-Forward-Period      The Multicast-Forward-Period field is two octets and indicates      the maximum period in seconds at which multicast packets can      be sent.  The maximum value for this field is 60 (one minute).      A value of zero indicates that there is no maximum period at      which multicast packets can be sent.  A value of hex type FFFF      indicates that the Multicast-Forward-Period is unknown.  A value      of five indicates that multicast packets will not be sent at a      rate more frequent than once every five seconds.  This two      octet value represents a 16 bit unsigned number sent with      the most significant octet first.   Priority      The Priority field is one octet long and indicates if multicast      packets have priority over other packets when being sent.  A value      of 0 indicates that directed packets have priority.  A value of 1      indicates that multicast packets have priority.3.4.  IEEE-MAC-Address-Required   Description      This boolean Configuration Option provides a method for the peer      to require that all NBF datagrams be sent with a 12 octet IEEE MAC      Address header.  By default, it is assumed that no MAC header is      required.   A summary of the IEEE-MAC-Address-Required Boolean Configuration   Option format is shown below.  The fields are transmitted from left   to right.    0                   1    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |     Type      |    Length     |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+Pall                        Standards Track                    [Page 11]RFC 2097                         NBFCP                      January 1997   Type      4   Length      2   Requirements      By default the NBF datagram is sent without any MAC header      information.  The NBF datagram information field is equivalent to      the data field in 802.3, 802.5, and FDDI frames.      If this option is negotiated successfully, each NBF datagram is      sent with a 12 octet IEEE MAC Address header prepended to the      information field.  A summary of the information field when using      12 octet IEEE MAC Headers is shown below. The fields are      transmitted from left to right.  The MAC Address is in non-      canonical form. This means that the first bit to be transmitted in      every byte is the most significant bit.    0                   1                   2                   3    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |                       Destination MAC Address                 |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |     Destination MAC Address   |  Source MAC Address           |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |                       Source MAC Address                      |   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   |               802.3/802.5/FDDI data field...   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+Security Considerations   Security issues are not discussed in this memo.References   [1]   Simpson, W., Editor, "The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP)",         STD 51, RFC 1661, July 1994.   [2]   Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers", STD 2,         RFC 1700, October 1994.   [3]   IBM Corp., "IBM Local Area Network Technical Reference",         Third Edition, Document Number SC30-3383-2, November 4, 1988.Pall                        Standards Track                    [Page 12]RFC 2097                         NBFCP                      January 1997   [4]   Baker, F., and R. Bowen "PPP Bridging Control Protocol (BCP)",         Work in Progress.Acknowledgments   Some of the text in this document is taken from previous documents   produced by the Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group of the Internet   Engineering Task Force (IETF).   Thomas J. Dimitri (previously at Microsoft Corporation) authored the   original draft.   Special thanks go to coworkers at Microsoft, Bill Simpson   (Daydreamer), Tom Coradetti (DigiBoard), Marty Del Vecchio (Shiva),   Russ Gocht (Shiva) and several members of the IETF PPP Working Group.Chair's Address   The working group can be contacted via the current chair:      Karl Fox      Ascend Communications      3518 Riverside Drive, Suite 101      Columbus, Ohio 43221      karl@MorningStar.com      karl@Ascend.comAuthor's Address   Questions about this memo can also be directed to:      Gurdeep Singh Pall      Microsoft Corporation      1 Microsoft Way      Redmond, WA 98052-6399      EMail: gurdeep@microsoft.comPall                        Standards Track                    [Page 13]

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -