📄 rfc2096.txt
字号:
Protocols defining 'policy' otherwise must ei- ther define a set of values which are valid for this object or must implement an integer- instanced policy table for which this object's value acts as an index." ::= { ipForwardEntry 3 }ipForwardNextHop OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX IpAddress MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "On remote routes, the address of the next sys- tem en route; Otherwise, 0.0.0.0." ::= { ipForwardEntry 4 }ipForwardIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "The ifIndex value which identifies the local interface through which the next hop of this route should be reached." DEFVAL { 0 } ::= { ipForwardEntry 5 }ipForwardType OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { other (1), -- not specified by this MIB invalid (2), -- logically deleted local (3), -- local interface remote (4) -- remote destination } MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "The type of route. Note that local(3) refers to a route for which the next hop is the final destination; remote(4) refers to a route for which the next hop is not the final destina- tion. Setting this object to the value invalid(2) has the effect of invalidating the corresponding entry in the ipForwardTable object. That is, it effectively disassociates the destination identified with said entry from the route iden-Baker Standards Track [Page 15]RFC 2096 IP Forwarding Table MIB January 1997 tified with said entry. It is an implementation-specific matter as to whether the agent removes an invalidated entry from the table. Accordingly, management stations must be prepared to receive tabular information from agents that corresponds to entries not current- ly in use. Proper interpretation of such en- tries requires examination of the relevant ip- ForwardType object." DEFVAL { invalid } ::= { ipForwardEntry 6 }ipForwardProto OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX INTEGER { other (1), -- not specified local (2), -- local interface netmgmt (3), -- static route icmp (4), -- result of ICMP Redirect -- the following are all dynamic -- routing protocols egp (5), -- Exterior Gateway Protocol ggp (6), -- Gateway-Gateway Protocol hello (7), -- FuzzBall HelloSpeak rip (8), -- Berkeley RIP or RIP-II is-is (9), -- Dual IS-IS es-is (10), -- ISO 9542 ciscoIgrp (11), -- Cisco IGRP bbnSpfIgp (12), -- BBN SPF IGP ospf (13), -- Open Shortest Path First bgp (14), -- Border Gateway Protocol idpr (15) -- InterDomain Policy Routing } MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "The routing mechanism via which this route was learned. Inclusion of values for gateway rout- ing protocols is not intended to imply that hosts should support those protocols." ::= { ipForwardEntry 7 }ipForwardAge OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-only STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "The number of seconds since this route wasBaker Standards Track [Page 16]RFC 2096 IP Forwarding Table MIB January 1997 last updated or otherwise determined to be correct. Note that no semantics of `too old' can be implied except through knowledge of the routing protocol by which the route was learned." DEFVAL { 0 } ::= { ipForwardEntry 8 }ipForwardInfo OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX OBJECT IDENTIFIER MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "A reference to MIB definitions specific to the particular routing protocol which is responsi- ble for this route, as determined by the value specified in the route's ipForwardProto value. If this information is not present, its value should be set to the OBJECT IDENTIFIER { 0 0 }, which is a syntactically valid object identif- ier, and any implementation conforming to ASN.1 and the Basic Encoding Rules must be able to generate and recognize this value." ::= { ipForwardEntry 9 }ipForwardNextHopAS OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "The Autonomous System Number of the Next Hop. When this is unknown or not relevant to the protocol indicated by ipForwardProto, zero." DEFVAL { 0 } ::= { ipForwardEntry 10 }ipForwardMetric1 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "The primary routing metric for this route. The semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value. If this metric is not used, its value should be set to -1." DEFVAL { -1 } ::= { ipForwardEntry 11 }Baker Standards Track [Page 17]RFC 2096 IP Forwarding Table MIB January 1997ipForwardMetric2 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "An alternate routing metric for this route. The semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value. If this metric is not used, its value should be set to -1." DEFVAL { -1 } ::= { ipForwardEntry 12 }ipForwardMetric3 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "An alternate routing metric for this route. The semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value. If this metric is not used, its value should be set to -1." DEFVAL { -1 } ::= { ipForwardEntry 13 }ipForwardMetric4 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "An alternate routing metric for this route. The semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-protocol specified in the route's ipForwardProto value. If this metric is not used, its value should be set to -1." DEFVAL { -1 } ::= { ipForwardEntry 14 }ipForwardMetric5 OBJECT-TYPE SYNTAX Integer32 MAX-ACCESS read-create STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "An alternate routing metric for this route. The semantics of this metric are determined by the routing-protocol specified in the route'sBaker Standards Track [Page 18]RFC 2096 IP Forwarding Table MIB January 1997 ipForwardProto value. If this metric is not used, its value should be set to -1." DEFVAL { -1 } ::= { ipForwardEntry 15 }-- Obsoleted Definitions - Groups-- compliance statementsipForwardOldCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "The compliance statement for SNMP entities which implement the ipForward MIB." MODULE -- this module MANDATORY-GROUPS { ipForwardMultiPathGroup } ::= { ipForwardCompliances 2 }ipForwardMultiPathGroup OBJECT-GROUP OBJECTS { ipForwardNumber, ipForwardDest, ipForwardMask, ipForwardPolicy, ipForwardNextHop, ipForwardIfIndex, ipForwardType, ipForwardProto, ipForwardAge, ipForwardInfo, ipForwardNextHopAS, ipForwardMetric1, ipForwardMetric2, ipForwardMetric3, ipForwardMetric4, ipForwardMetric5 } STATUS obsolete DESCRIPTION "IP Multipath Route Table." ::= { ipForwardGroups 2 }ENDBaker Standards Track [Page 19]RFC 2096 IP Forwarding Table MIB January 19975. Acknowledgements This work was originally performed by the Router Requirements Working Group at the request of the OSPF Working Group. This update was performed under the auspices of the OSPF Working Group. John Moy of Proteon Incorporated is the chair.6. References[1] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information for version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1442, SNMP Research, Inc., Hughes LAN Systems, Dover Beach Consulting, Inc., Carnegie Mellon University, April 1993.[2] Galvin, J., and K. McCloghrie, "Administrative Model for version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1445, Trusted Information Systems, Hughes LAN Systems, April 1993.[3] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol Operations for version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1448, SNMP Research, Inc., Hughes LAN Systems, Dover Beach Consulting, Inc., Carnegie Mellon University, April 1993.[4] McCloghrie, K., and M. Rose, "Management Information Base for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets - MIB- II", STD 17, RFC 1213, Hughes LAN Systems, Performance Systems International, March 1991.[5] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.[6] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1443, SNMP Research, Inc., Hughes LAN Systems, Dover Beach Consulting, Inc., Carnegie Mellon University, April 1993.[7] Baker, F., "IP Forwarding Table MIB", RFC 1354, July 1992.Baker Standards Track [Page 20]RFC 2096 IP Forwarding Table MIB January 19977. Security Considerations Security is an objective not in this MIB view.8. Author's Address Fred Baker Cisco Systems 519 Lado Drive Santa Barbara, California 93111 Phone: +1 805 681 0115 EMail: fred@cisco.comBaker Standards Track [Page 21]
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -