⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc2096.txt

📁 著名的RFC文档,其中有一些文档是已经翻译成中文的的.
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 3 页
字号:
       Protocols defining 'policy' otherwise must  ei-       ther define a set of values which are valid for       this  object  or  must  implement  an  integer-       instanced  policy table for which this object's       value acts as an index."    ::= { ipForwardEntry 3 }ipForwardNextHop OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   IpAddress    MAX-ACCESS read-only    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "On remote routes, the address of the next sys-       tem en route; Otherwise, 0.0.0.0."    ::= { ipForwardEntry 4 }ipForwardIfIndex OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   Integer32    MAX-ACCESS read-create    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "The ifIndex value which identifies  the  local       interface  through  which  the next hop of this       route should be reached."    DEFVAL { 0 }    ::= { ipForwardEntry 5 }ipForwardType OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   INTEGER {                other    (1), -- not specified by this MIB                invalid  (2), -- logically deleted                local    (3), -- local interface                remote   (4)  -- remote destination             }    MAX-ACCESS read-create    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "The type of route.  Note that local(3)  refers       to  a route for which the next hop is the final       destination; remote(4) refers to  a  route  for       which  the  next  hop is not the final destina-       tion.       Setting this object to the value invalid(2) has       the  effect  of  invalidating the corresponding       entry in the ipForwardTable object.   That  is,       it  effectively  disassociates  the destination       identified with said entry from the route iden-Baker                       Standards Track                    [Page 15]RFC 2096                IP Forwarding Table MIB             January 1997       tified    with    said   entry.    It   is   an       implementation-specific matter  as  to  whether       the agent removes an invalidated entry from the       table.  Accordingly, management  stations  must       be prepared to receive tabular information from       agents that corresponds to entries not current-       ly  in  use.  Proper interpretation of such en-       tries requires examination of the relevant  ip-       ForwardType object."    DEFVAL { invalid }    ::= { ipForwardEntry 6 }ipForwardProto OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   INTEGER {                other     (1),  -- not specified                local     (2),  -- local interface                netmgmt   (3),  -- static route                icmp      (4),  -- result of ICMP Redirect                        -- the following are all dynamic                        -- routing protocols                egp       (5),  -- Exterior Gateway Protocol                ggp       (6),  -- Gateway-Gateway Protocol                hello     (7),  -- FuzzBall HelloSpeak                rip       (8),  -- Berkeley RIP or RIP-II                is-is     (9),  -- Dual IS-IS                es-is     (10), -- ISO 9542                ciscoIgrp (11), -- Cisco IGRP                bbnSpfIgp (12), -- BBN SPF IGP                ospf      (13), -- Open Shortest Path First                bgp       (14), -- Border Gateway Protocol                idpr      (15)  -- InterDomain Policy Routing             }    MAX-ACCESS read-only    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "The routing mechanism via which this route was       learned.  Inclusion of values for gateway rout-       ing protocols is not  intended  to  imply  that       hosts should support those protocols."    ::= { ipForwardEntry 7 }ipForwardAge OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   Integer32    MAX-ACCESS read-only    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "The number of seconds  since  this  route  wasBaker                       Standards Track                    [Page 16]RFC 2096                IP Forwarding Table MIB             January 1997       last  updated  or  otherwise  determined  to be       correct.  Note that no semantics of  `too  old'       can  be implied except through knowledge of the       routing  protocol  by  which  the   route   was       learned."    DEFVAL  { 0 }    ::= { ipForwardEntry 8 }ipForwardInfo OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   OBJECT IDENTIFIER    MAX-ACCESS read-create    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "A reference to MIB definitions specific to the       particular  routing protocol which is responsi-       ble for this route, as determined by the  value       specified  in the route's ipForwardProto value.       If this information is not present,  its  value       should be set to the OBJECT IDENTIFIER { 0 0 },       which is a syntactically valid object  identif-       ier, and any implementation conforming to ASN.1       and the Basic Encoding Rules must  be  able  to       generate and recognize this value."    ::= { ipForwardEntry 9 }ipForwardNextHopAS OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   Integer32    MAX-ACCESS read-create    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "The Autonomous System Number of the Next  Hop.       When  this  is  unknown  or not relevant to the       protocol indicated by ipForwardProto, zero."    DEFVAL { 0 }    ::= { ipForwardEntry 10 }ipForwardMetric1 OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   Integer32    MAX-ACCESS read-create    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "The primary routing  metric  for  this  route.       The  semantics of this metric are determined by       the routing-protocol specified in  the  route's       ipForwardProto  value.   If  this metric is not       used, its value should be set to -1."    DEFVAL { -1 }    ::= { ipForwardEntry 11 }Baker                       Standards Track                    [Page 17]RFC 2096                IP Forwarding Table MIB             January 1997ipForwardMetric2 OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   Integer32    MAX-ACCESS read-create    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "An alternate routing metric  for  this  route.       The  semantics of this metric are determined by       the routing-protocol specified in  the  route's       ipForwardProto  value.   If  this metric is not       used, its value should be set to -1."    DEFVAL { -1 }    ::= { ipForwardEntry 12 }ipForwardMetric3 OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   Integer32    MAX-ACCESS read-create    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "An alternate routing metric  for  this  route.       The  semantics of this metric are determined by       the routing-protocol specified in  the  route's       ipForwardProto  value.   If  this metric is not       used, its value should be set to -1."    DEFVAL { -1 }    ::= { ipForwardEntry 13 }ipForwardMetric4 OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   Integer32    MAX-ACCESS read-create    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "An alternate routing metric  for  this  route.       The  semantics of this metric are determined by       the routing-protocol specified in  the  route's       ipForwardProto  value.   If  this metric is not       used, its value should be set to -1."    DEFVAL { -1 }    ::= { ipForwardEntry 14 }ipForwardMetric5 OBJECT-TYPE    SYNTAX   Integer32    MAX-ACCESS read-create    STATUS   obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "An alternate routing metric  for  this  route.       The  semantics of this metric are determined by       the routing-protocol specified in  the  route'sBaker                       Standards Track                    [Page 18]RFC 2096                IP Forwarding Table MIB             January 1997       ipForwardProto  value.   If  this metric is not       used, its value should be set to -1."    DEFVAL { -1 }    ::= { ipForwardEntry 15 }-- Obsoleted Definitions - Groups-- compliance statementsipForwardOldCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE   STATUS  obsolete   DESCRIPTION       "The compliance statement for SNMP entities       which implement the ipForward MIB."   MODULE  -- this module   MANDATORY-GROUPS { ipForwardMultiPathGroup }   ::= { ipForwardCompliances 2 }ipForwardMultiPathGroup OBJECT-GROUP    OBJECTS { ipForwardNumber,              ipForwardDest, ipForwardMask, ipForwardPolicy,              ipForwardNextHop, ipForwardIfIndex, ipForwardType,              ipForwardProto, ipForwardAge, ipForwardInfo,              ipForwardNextHopAS,              ipForwardMetric1, ipForwardMetric2, ipForwardMetric3,              ipForwardMetric4, ipForwardMetric5        }    STATUS  obsolete    DESCRIPTION       "IP Multipath Route Table."    ::= { ipForwardGroups 2 }ENDBaker                       Standards Track                    [Page 19]RFC 2096                IP Forwarding Table MIB             January 19975.  Acknowledgements   This work was originally performed by the Router Requirements   Working Group at the request of the OSPF Working Group.  This update   was performed under the auspices of the OSPF Working Group.  John Moy   of Proteon Incorporated is the chair.6.  References[1]  Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser,     "Structure of Management Information for version 2 of the     Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1442,     SNMP Research, Inc., Hughes LAN Systems, Dover Beach     Consulting, Inc., Carnegie Mellon University, April 1993.[2]  Galvin, J., and K. McCloghrie, "Administrative Model for     version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol     (SNMPv2)", RFC 1445, Trusted Information Systems, Hughes     LAN Systems, April 1993.[3]  Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser,     "Protocol Operations for version 2 of the Simple Network     Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1448, SNMP Research,     Inc., Hughes LAN Systems, Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.,     Carnegie Mellon University, April 1993.[4]  McCloghrie, K., and M. Rose, "Management Information Base     for Network Management of TCP/IP-based internets - MIB-     II", STD 17, RFC 1213, Hughes LAN Systems, Performance     Systems International, March 1991.[5]  Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791,     USC/Information Sciences Institute, September 1981.[6]  Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser,     "Textual Conventions for version 2 of the Simple Network     Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1443, SNMP Research,     Inc., Hughes LAN Systems, Dover Beach Consulting, Inc.,     Carnegie Mellon University, April 1993.[7]  Baker, F., "IP Forwarding Table MIB", RFC 1354, July 1992.Baker                       Standards Track                    [Page 20]RFC 2096                IP Forwarding Table MIB             January 19977.  Security Considerations   Security is an objective not in this MIB view.8.  Author's Address   Fred Baker   Cisco Systems   519 Lado Drive   Santa Barbara, California 93111   Phone: +1 805 681 0115   EMail: fred@cisco.comBaker                       Standards Track                    [Page 21]

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -