📄 inval.c
字号:
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * inval.c * POSTGRES cache invalidation dispatcher code. * * This is subtle stuff, so pay attention: * * When a tuple is updated or deleted, our standard time qualification rules * consider that it is *still valid* so long as we are in the same command, * ie, until the next CommandCounterIncrement() or transaction commit. * (See utils/time/tqual.c, and note that system catalogs are generally * scanned under SnapshotNow rules by the system, or plain user snapshots * for user queries.) At the command boundary, the old tuple stops * being valid and the new version, if any, becomes valid. Therefore, * we cannot simply flush a tuple from the system caches during heap_update() * or heap_delete(). The tuple is still good at that point; what's more, * even if we did flush it, it might be reloaded into the caches by a later * request in the same command. So the correct behavior is to keep a list * of outdated (updated/deleted) tuples and then do the required cache * flushes at the next command boundary. We must also keep track of * inserted tuples so that we can flush "negative" cache entries that match * the new tuples; again, that mustn't happen until end of command. * * Once we have finished the command, we still need to remember inserted * tuples (including new versions of updated tuples), so that we can flush * them from the caches if we abort the transaction. Similarly, we'd better * be able to flush "negative" cache entries that may have been loaded in * place of deleted tuples, so we still need the deleted ones too. * * If we successfully complete the transaction, we have to broadcast all * these invalidation events to other backends (via the SI message queue) * so that they can flush obsolete entries from their caches. Note we have * to record the transaction commit before sending SI messages, otherwise * the other backends won't see our updated tuples as good. * * When a subtransaction aborts, we can process and discard any events * it has queued. When a subtransaction commits, we just add its events * to the pending lists of the parent transaction. * * In short, we need to remember until xact end every insert or delete * of a tuple that might be in the system caches. Updates are treated as * two events, delete + insert, for simplicity. (There are cases where * it'd be possible to record just one event, but we don't currently try.) * * We do not need to register EVERY tuple operation in this way, just those * on tuples in relations that have associated catcaches. We do, however, * have to register every operation on every tuple that *could* be in a * catcache, whether or not it currently is in our cache. Also, if the * tuple is in a relation that has multiple catcaches, we need to register * an invalidation message for each such catcache. catcache.c's * PrepareToInvalidateCacheTuple() routine provides the knowledge of which * catcaches may need invalidation for a given tuple. * * Also, whenever we see an operation on a pg_class or pg_attribute tuple, * we register a relcache flush operation for the relation described by that * tuple. pg_class updates trigger an smgr flush operation as well. * * We keep the relcache and smgr flush requests in lists separate from the * catcache tuple flush requests. This allows us to issue all the pending * catcache flushes before we issue relcache flushes, which saves us from * loading a catcache tuple during relcache load only to flush it again * right away. Also, we avoid queuing multiple relcache flush requests for * the same relation, since a relcache flush is relatively expensive to do. * (XXX is it worth testing likewise for duplicate catcache flush entries? * Probably not.) * * If a relcache flush is issued for a system relation that we preload * from the relcache init file, we must also delete the init file so that * it will be rebuilt during the next backend restart. The actual work of * manipulating the init file is in relcache.c, but we keep track of the * need for it here. * * The request lists proper are kept in CurTransactionContext of their * creating (sub)transaction, since they can be forgotten on abort of that * transaction but must be kept till top-level commit otherwise. For * simplicity we keep the controlling list-of-lists in TopTransactionContext. * * * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2005, PostgreSQL Global Development Group * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California * * IDENTIFICATION * $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/utils/cache/inval.c,v 1.73.2.2 2006/01/19 21:49:30 tgl Exp $ * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */#include "postgres.h"#include "access/twophase_rmgr.h"#include "access/xact.h"#include "catalog/catalog.h"#include "miscadmin.h"#include "storage/sinval.h"#include "storage/smgr.h"#include "utils/catcache.h"#include "utils/inval.h"#include "utils/memutils.h"#include "utils/relcache.h"#include "utils/syscache.h"/* * To minimize palloc traffic, we keep pending requests in successively- * larger chunks (a slightly more sophisticated version of an expansible * array). All request types can be stored as SharedInvalidationMessage * records. The ordering of requests within a list is never significant. */typedef struct InvalidationChunk{ struct InvalidationChunk *next; /* list link */ int nitems; /* # items currently stored in chunk */ int maxitems; /* size of allocated array in this chunk */ SharedInvalidationMessage msgs[1]; /* VARIABLE LENGTH ARRAY */} InvalidationChunk; /* VARIABLE LENGTH STRUCTURE */typedef struct InvalidationListHeader{ InvalidationChunk *cclist; /* list of chunks holding catcache msgs */ InvalidationChunk *rclist; /* list of chunks holding relcache/smgr msgs */} InvalidationListHeader;/*---------------- * Invalidation info is divided into two lists: * 1) events so far in current command, not yet reflected to caches. * 2) events in previous commands of current transaction; these have * been reflected to local caches, and must be either broadcast to * other backends or rolled back from local cache when we commit * or abort the transaction. * Actually, we need two such lists for each level of nested transaction, * so that we can discard events from an aborted subtransaction. When * a subtransaction commits, we append its lists to the parent's lists. * * The relcache-file-invalidated flag can just be a simple boolean, * since we only act on it at transaction commit; we don't care which * command of the transaction set it. *---------------- */typedef struct TransInvalidationInfo{ /* Back link to parent transaction's info */ struct TransInvalidationInfo *parent; /* Subtransaction nesting depth */ int my_level; /* head of current-command event list */ InvalidationListHeader CurrentCmdInvalidMsgs; /* head of previous-commands event list */ InvalidationListHeader PriorCmdInvalidMsgs; /* init file must be invalidated? */ bool RelcacheInitFileInval;} TransInvalidationInfo;static TransInvalidationInfo *transInvalInfo = NULL;/* * Dynamically-registered callback functions. Current implementation * assumes there won't be very many of these at once; could improve if needed. */#define MAX_CACHE_CALLBACKS 20static struct CACHECALLBACK{ int16 id; /* cache number or message type id */ CacheCallbackFunction function; Datum arg;} cache_callback_list[MAX_CACHE_CALLBACKS];static int cache_callback_count = 0;/* info values for 2PC callback */#define TWOPHASE_INFO_MSG 0 /* SharedInvalidationMessage */#define TWOPHASE_INFO_FILE_BEFORE 1 /* relcache file inval */#define TWOPHASE_INFO_FILE_AFTER 2 /* relcache file inval */static void PersistInvalidationMessage(SharedInvalidationMessage *msg);/* ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Invalidation list support functions * * These three routines encapsulate processing of the "chunked" * representation of what is logically just a list of messages. * ---------------------------------------------------------------- *//* * AddInvalidationMessage * Add an invalidation message to a list (of chunks). * * Note that we do not pay any great attention to maintaining the original * ordering of the messages. */static voidAddInvalidationMessage(InvalidationChunk **listHdr, SharedInvalidationMessage *msg){ InvalidationChunk *chunk = *listHdr; if (chunk == NULL) { /* First time through; create initial chunk */#define FIRSTCHUNKSIZE 16 chunk = (InvalidationChunk *) MemoryContextAlloc(CurTransactionContext, sizeof(InvalidationChunk) + (FIRSTCHUNKSIZE - 1) *sizeof(SharedInvalidationMessage)); chunk->nitems = 0; chunk->maxitems = FIRSTCHUNKSIZE; chunk->next = *listHdr; *listHdr = chunk; } else if (chunk->nitems >= chunk->maxitems) { /* Need another chunk; double size of last chunk */ int chunksize = 2 * chunk->maxitems; chunk = (InvalidationChunk *) MemoryContextAlloc(CurTransactionContext, sizeof(InvalidationChunk) + (chunksize - 1) *sizeof(SharedInvalidationMessage)); chunk->nitems = 0; chunk->maxitems = chunksize; chunk->next = *listHdr; *listHdr = chunk; } /* Okay, add message to current chunk */ chunk->msgs[chunk->nitems] = *msg; chunk->nitems++;}/* * Append one list of invalidation message chunks to another, resetting * the source chunk-list pointer to NULL. */static voidAppendInvalidationMessageList(InvalidationChunk **destHdr, InvalidationChunk **srcHdr){ InvalidationChunk *chunk = *srcHdr; if (chunk == NULL) return; /* nothing to do */ while (chunk->next != NULL) chunk = chunk->next; chunk->next = *destHdr; *destHdr = *srcHdr; *srcHdr = NULL;}/* * Process a list of invalidation messages. * * This is a macro that executes the given code fragment for each message in * a message chunk list. The fragment should refer to the message as *msg. */#define ProcessMessageList(listHdr, codeFragment) \ do { \ InvalidationChunk *_chunk; \ for (_chunk = (listHdr); _chunk != NULL; _chunk = _chunk->next) \ { \ int _cindex; \ for (_cindex = 0; _cindex < _chunk->nitems; _cindex++) \ { \ SharedInvalidationMessage *msg = &_chunk->msgs[_cindex]; \ codeFragment; \ } \ } \ } while (0)/* ---------------------------------------------------------------- * Invalidation set support functions * * These routines understand about the division of a logical invalidation * list into separate physical lists for catcache and relcache/smgr entries. * ---------------------------------------------------------------- *//* * Add a catcache inval entry */static voidAddCatcacheInvalidationMessage(InvalidationListHeader *hdr, int id, uint32 hashValue, ItemPointer tuplePtr, Oid dbId){ SharedInvalidationMessage msg; msg.cc.id = (int16) id; msg.cc.tuplePtr = *tuplePtr; msg.cc.dbId = dbId; msg.cc.hashValue = hashValue; AddInvalidationMessage(&hdr->cclist, &msg);}/* * Add a relcache inval entry */static voidAddRelcacheInvalidationMessage(InvalidationListHeader *hdr, Oid dbId, Oid relId){ SharedInvalidationMessage msg; /* Don't add a duplicate item */ /* We assume dbId need not be checked because it will never change */ ProcessMessageList(hdr->rclist, if (msg->rc.id == SHAREDINVALRELCACHE_ID && msg->rc.relId == relId) return); /* OK, add the item */ msg.rc.id = SHAREDINVALRELCACHE_ID; msg.rc.dbId = dbId; msg.rc.relId = relId; AddInvalidationMessage(&hdr->rclist, &msg);}/* * Add an smgr inval entry */static voidAddSmgrInvalidationMessage(InvalidationListHeader *hdr, RelFileNode rnode){ SharedInvalidationMessage msg; /* Don't add a duplicate item */ ProcessMessageList(hdr->rclist, if (msg->sm.id == SHAREDINVALSMGR_ID && RelFileNodeEquals(msg->sm.rnode, rnode)) return); /* OK, add the item */ msg.sm.id = SHAREDINVALSMGR_ID; msg.sm.rnode = rnode; AddInvalidationMessage(&hdr->rclist, &msg);}/* * Append one list of invalidation messages to another, resetting * the source list to empty. */static voidAppendInvalidationMessages(InvalidationListHeader *dest, InvalidationListHeader *src){ AppendInvalidationMessageList(&dest->cclist, &src->cclist); AppendInvalidationMessageList(&dest->rclist, &src->rclist);}
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -