⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc2620.txt

📁 gnu 的radius服务器很好用的
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 2 页
字号:
            "The number of RADIUS Accounting-Request packets             sent to this server that have not yet timed out or             received a response. This variable is incremented when an             Accounting-Request is sent and decremented due to             receipt of an Accounting-Response, a timeout or             a retransmission."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry 10 }radiusAccClientTimeouts OBJECT-TYPE     SYNTAX Counter32     MAX-ACCESS read-only     STATUS current     DESCRIPTION          "The number of accounting timeouts to this server.           After a timeout the client may retry to the same           server, send to a different server, or give up.           A retry to the same server is counted as a           retransmit as well as a timeout. A send to a different           server is counted as an Accounting-Request as well as           a timeout."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry  11 }radiusAccClientUnknownTypes OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 7]RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS packets of unknown type which             were received from this server on the accounting port."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry  12 }radiusAccClientPacketsDropped OBJECT-TYPE      SYNTAX Counter32      MAX-ACCESS read-only      STATUS current      DESCRIPTION            "The number of RADIUS packets which were received from             this server on the accounting port and dropped for some             other reason."      ::= { radiusAccServerEntry  13 }-- conformance informationradiusAccClientMIBConformance          OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusAccClientMIB 2 }radiusAccClientMIBCompliances          OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusAccClientMIBConformance 1 }radiusAccClientMIBGroups          OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { radiusAccClientMIBConformance 2 }-- compliance statementsradiusAccClientMIBCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE     STATUS  current     DESCRIPTION           "The compliance statement for accounting clients            implementing the RADIUS Accounting Client MIB."     MODULE  -- this module         MANDATORY-GROUPS { radiusAccClientMIBGroup }     ::= { radiusAccClientMIBCompliances 1 }-- units of conformanceradiusAccClientMIBGroup OBJECT-GROUP     OBJECTS { radiusAccClientIdentifier,               radiusAccClientInvalidServerAddresses,               radiusAccServerAddress,               radiusAccClientServerPortNumber,               radiusAccClientRoundTripTime,               radiusAccClientRequests,Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 8]RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999               radiusAccClientRetransmissions,               radiusAccClientResponses,               radiusAccClientMalformedResponses,               radiusAccClientBadAuthenticators,               radiusAccClientPendingRequests,               radiusAccClientTimeouts,               radiusAccClientUnknownTypes,               radiusAccClientPacketsDropped         }     STATUS  current     DESCRIPTION           "The basic collection of objects providing management of            RADIUS Accounting Clients."     ::= { radiusAccClientMIBGroups 1 }END5.  References   [1]  Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture        for Describing SNMP Management Frameworks", RFC 2571, April        1999.   [2]  Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of        Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets", STD 16, RFC        1155, May 1990.   [3]  Rose, M., and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16,        RFC 1212, March 1991.   [4]  Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the        SNMP", RFC 1215, Performance Systems International, March 1991.   [5]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information        Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.   [6]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58,        RFC 2579, April 1999.   [7]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD        58, RFC 2580, April 1999.   [8]  Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M., and J. Davin, "Simple        Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, May 1990.Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                      [Page 9]RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999   [9]  Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser,        "Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2", RFC 1901, January        1996.   [10] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser,        "Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network        Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1906, January 1996.   [11] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R., and B. Wijnen, "Message        Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management        Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2572, April 1999.   [12] Blumenthal, U., and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model for        Version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv3)",        RFC 2574, April 1999.   [13] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol        Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management        Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996.   [14] Levi, D., Meyer, P., and B. Stewart, "SNMP Applications", RFC        2573, April 1999.   [15] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R., and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access        Control Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol        (SNMP)", RFC 2575, April 1999.   [16] Rigney, C., "RADIUS Accounting", RFC 2139, April 1997.6.  Security Considerations   There are no management objects defined in this MIB that have a MAX-   ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create.  So, if this MIB is   implemented correctly, then there is no risk that an intruder can   alter or create any management objects of this MIB via direct SNMP   SET opertions.   There are a number of managed objects in this MIB that may contain   sensitive information. These are:Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                     [Page 10]RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 1999   radiusAccServerAddress             This can be used to determine the address of the RADIUS             accounting server with which the client is communicating.             This information could be useful in mounting an attack on             the acounting server, which may contain sensitive financial             data.   radiusAccClientServerPortNumber This can be used to determine the             port number on which the RADIUS accounting client is             sending. This information could be useful in impersonating             the client in order to send fraudulent data to the             accounting server.   It is thus important to control even GET access to these objects and   possibly to even encrypt the values of these object when sending them   over the network via SNMP.  Not all versions of SNMP provide features   for such a secure environment.   SNMPv1 by itself is not a secure environment. Even if the network   itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), there is no control as   to who on the secure network is allowed to access and GET/SET   (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB.   It is recommended that the implementers consider the security   features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework. Specifically, the use   of the User-based Security Model RFC 2574 [12] and the View-based   Access Control Model RFC 2575 [15] is recommended.  Using these   security features, customer/users can give access to the objects only   to those principals (users) that have legitimate rights to GET or SET   (change/create/delete) them.7.  Acknowledgments   The authors acknowledge the contributions of the RADIUS Working Group   in the development of this MIB.  Thanks to Narendra Gidwani of   Microsoft, Allan C. Rubens of MERIT, Carl Rigney of Livingston and   Peter Heitman of American Internet Corporation for useful discussions   of this problem space.Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                     [Page 11]RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 19998.  Authors' Addresses   Bernard Aboba   Microsoft Corporation   One Microsoft Way   Redmond, WA 98052   Phone: 425-936-6605   EMail: bernarda@microsoft.com   Glen Zorn   Microsoft Corporation   One Microsoft Way   Redmond, WA 98052   Phone: 425-703-1559   EMail: glennz@microsoft.comAboba & Zorn                 Informational                     [Page 12]RFC 2620              RADIUS Accounting Client MIB             June 19999.  Full Copyright Statement   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it   or assist in its implmentation may be prepared, copied, published and   distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind,   provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than   English.   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.Acknowledgement   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the   Internet Society.Aboba & Zorn                 Informational                     [Page 13]

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -