predicates.md

来自「linux下编程用 编译软件」· Markdown 代码 · 共 152 行

MD
152
字号
;; Operand and operator predicates for the GCC MMIX port.;; Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.;; This file is part of GCC.;;;; GCC is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify;; it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by;; the Free Software Foundation; either version 2, or (at your option);; any later version.;;;; GCC is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,;; but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of;; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the;; GNU General Public License for more details.;;;; You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License;; along with GCC; see the file COPYING.  If not, write to;; the Free Software Foundation, 51 Franklin Street - Fifth Floor,;; Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.;; True if this is a foldable comparison operator;; - one where a the result of (compare:CC (reg) (const_int 0)) can be;; replaced by (reg).  */(define_predicate "mmix_foldable_comparison_operator"  (match_code "ne, eq, ge, gt, le, lt, gtu, leu"){  RTX_CODE code = GET_CODE (op);  if (mode == VOIDmode)    mode = GET_MODE (op);  /* This little bit is why the body of this predicate is kept as C.  */  if (mode == VOIDmode)    mode = GET_MODE (XEXP (op, 0));  return ((mode == CCmode || mode == DImode)	  && (code == NE || code == EQ || code == GE || code == GT	      || code == LE || code == LT))    /* FIXME: This may be a stupid trick.  What happens when GCC wants to       reverse the condition?  Can it do that by itself?  Maybe it can       even reverse the condition to fit a foldable one in the first       place?  */    || (mode == CC_UNSmode && (code == GTU || code == LEU));});; Like comparison_operator, but only true if this comparison operator is;; applied to a valid mode.  Needed to avoid jump.c generating invalid;; code with -ffast-math (gcc.dg/20001228-1.c).(define_predicate "mmix_comparison_operator"  (match_operand 0 "comparison_operator"){  RTX_CODE code = GET_CODE (op);  /* Comparison operators usually don't have a mode, but let's try and get     one anyway for the day that changes.  */  if (mode == VOIDmode)    mode = GET_MODE (op);  /* Get the mode from the first operand if we don't have one.     Also the reason why we do this in C.  */  if (mode == VOIDmode)    mode = GET_MODE (XEXP (op, 0));  /* FIXME: This needs to be kept in sync with the tables in     mmix_output_condition.  */  return    mode == VOIDmode    || (mode == CC_FUNmode	&& (code == ORDERED || code == UNORDERED))    || (mode == CC_FPmode	&& (code == GT || code == LT))    || (mode == CC_FPEQmode	&& (code == NE || code == EQ))    || (mode == CC_UNSmode	&& (code == GEU || code == GTU || code == LEU || code == LTU))    || (mode == CCmode	&& (code == NE || code == EQ || code == GE || code == GT	    || code == LE || code == LT))    || (mode == DImode	&& (code == NE || code == EQ || code == GE || code == GT	    || code == LE || code == LT || code == LEU || code == GTU));});; True if this is a register with a condition-code mode.(define_predicate "mmix_reg_cc_operand"  (and (match_operand 0 "register_operand")       (ior (match_test "GET_MODE (op) == CCmode")	    (ior (match_test "GET_MODE (op) == CC_UNSmode")		 (ior (match_test "GET_MODE (op) == CC_FPmode")		      (ior (match_test "GET_MODE (op) == CC_FPEQmode")			   (match_test "GET_MODE (op) == CC_FUNmode")))))));; True if this is an address_operand or a symbolic operand.(define_predicate "mmix_symbolic_or_address_operand"  (match_code "symbol_ref, label_ref, const, subreg, reg, plus"){  switch (GET_CODE (op))    {    case SYMBOL_REF:    case LABEL_REF:      return 1;    case CONST:      /* The reason why this body still is C.  */      op = XEXP (op, 0);      if ((GET_CODE (XEXP (op, 0)) == SYMBOL_REF	   || GET_CODE (XEXP (op, 0)) == LABEL_REF)	  && (GET_CODE (XEXP (op, 1)) == CONST_INT	      || (GET_CODE (XEXP (op, 1)) == CONST_DOUBLE		  && GET_MODE (XEXP (op, 1)) == VOIDmode)))	return 1;      /* Fall through.  */    default:      return address_operand (op, mode);    }});; True if this is a register or CONST_INT (or CONST_DOUBLE for DImode).;; We could narrow the value down with a couple of predicates, but that;; doesn't seem to be worth it at the moment.(define_predicate "mmix_reg_or_constant_operand"  (ior (match_operand 0 "register_operand")       (ior (match_code "const_int")	    (and (match_code "const_double")		 (match_test "GET_MODE (op) == VOIDmode")))));; True if this is a register or 0 (int or float).(define_predicate "mmix_reg_or_0_operand"  (ior   (match_operand 0 "register_operand")   (ior    (and (match_code "const_int")	 (match_test "op == const0_rtx"))    (and     (match_code "const_double")     ;; FIXME: Is mode calculation necessary and correct?     (match_test      "op == CONST0_RTX (mode == VOIDmode ? GET_MODE (op) : mode)")))));; True if this is a register or an int 0..255.(define_predicate "mmix_reg_or_8bit_operand"  (ior   (match_operand 0 "register_operand")   (and (match_code "const_int")	(match_test "CONST_OK_FOR_LETTER_P (INTVAL (op), 'I')"))))

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?