faq.wml

gcc的组建

#!wml --include=..

#include "include/layout.wml"

##
#
# Special Tags
#



#
# <faq-section name="XYZ>
#	<faq question="ABC">answer</faq>
#	<faq question="ABC">answer</faq>
# </faq-section>	
#

# the section counter
#
<set-var __SECCNT=1>

<define-tag faq-section endtag=required>
	<preserve name>
	<set-var %attributes>
{#FAQINDEX#:
		<boxtitle><get-var __SECCNT>. <get-var name></boxtitle>
		<boxitem>
:#FAQINDEX#}
	<boxtitle><get-var __SECCNT>. <get-var name></boxtitle>
	<set-var __FAQCNT=1>
	<boxitem>%body</boxitem>
{#FAQINDEX#:
		<br>
		</boxitem>
:#FAQINDEX#}
	<increment __SECCNT>
	<restore name>
</define-tag>

<define-tag faq endtag=required>
<preserve question>
<set-var %attributes>
{#FAQINDEX#:
	<strong><a href="faq/faq.html#faq<get-var __SECCNT>_<get-var __FAQCNT>"><get-var __SECCNT>.<get-var __FAQCNT> <get-var question></a></strong><br>
:#FAQINDEX#}
	<h3><a name="faq<get-var __SECCNT>_<get-var __FAQCNT>"><get-var __SECCNT>.<get-var __FAQCNT> <get-var question></a></h3>
	%body
	<br>
<increment __FAQCNT>
<restore question>
</define-tag>


<set-var last-modified-author="prk">

<subject "GNU Classpath FAQ">

<box>
{#FAQINDEX#}

<faq-section name="introduction">
<faq question="What is GNU Classpath?">
<p>GNU Classpath is a set of essential libraries for supporting
the Java programming language.</p>

<p>Classpath serves the same role that <a
href="http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/libc.html">libc</a> has for C,
but is much richer in functionality. The broadness of the standard
library is an important reason why Java has been so successful. For
example, the library includes frameworks to convert between character
encodings, for accessing relational databases, for building Graphical
User Interfaces, for encryption, for logging, and for numerous other
tasks that are needed to build complex applications.</p>

</faq>

<faq question="Why Java?">
<p>On the GNU operating system, we want to run software independent of
the programming language in which it was written. Because Java is
widespread, and because Java has some nice features, we want to
support Java as well.</p>

</faq>

<faq question="But isn't Java free already?">
<p>Sun Microsystems, the company who has created Java, currently
distributes the &#x201c;Java Development Kit&#x201d; and &#x201c;Java
Runtime Environment&#x201d; at no cost. The former even comes with the
source code of the standard class library. However, the &#x201c;Sun
Community Source License&#x201d; <a
href="http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SunCommunitySourceLicense">does
not grant essential freedoms</a>, for example the right to distribute
a modified version of the code.</p>

<p>Therefore, Sun&#x2019;s implementation does not qualify as Free
Software.</p>

</faq>

<faq question="What do we need to make Java free?">

<p>Though it would be helpful if Sun would open their sources, this is not the
most important step toward a free Java. Even more important for a free Java are:
<ul>
<li>Access to the TCK (Technology Compatibility Kits) on acceptable terms
<li>Involvement in the JCP without contamination or other unacceptable
   constraints
<li>Easing of the requirements on subsetting.  The free software
   community doesn't work well with the "one big perfect release"
   model that Sun seems to want.  
</ul>

<p>There was already a lot of discussions around this topic on other sites:
<ul>
<li><createlink name="Sys-Con: <i>Let's Bundle Free Java with Linux</i>, Says IBM's Sutor" url="http://sys-con.com/story/print.cfm?storyid=43969">
<li><createlink name="Hacking Log 4.0: RE: JCP 2.6 - Are we there yet?" url="http://linuxintegrators.com/blog/acoliver/news/?permalink=0124.html">
<li><createlink name="Javalobby: ESR - Open Letter to Sun: Let Java Go" url="http://www.javalobby.org/thread.jspa?forumID=61&threadID=11412">
</ul>


</faq>

<faq question="Is GNU Classpath all that is needed for running Java programs?">
<p>GNU Classpath is a free implementation of Java&#x2019;s standard
library.  To execute Java programs, it is also necessary to have a
Java Virtual Machine (JVM). This component manages memory, enforces
security restrictions, compiles Java bytecodes to the instruction set
of your computer, and provides other runtime services.  There exist
several projects for <createlink name="free JVMs" url="stories.html#jvm">. Most use GNU Classpath as the
up-stream source for their library.</p>

<p>Java programs can also be compiled &#x201c;ahead of time,&#x201d;
like C++ or other compiled languages. The GNU Compiler Collection
(GCC) does this, and its Java library is mostly derived from GNU
Classpath.</p>
</faq>

</faq-section>

<faq-section name="licensing">

<faq question="Under which licence is GNU Classpath released?">
GNU Classpath is licensed under the GPL plus a special exception:

<blockquote>
<p>
<code>
Linking this library statically or dynamically with other modules is
making a combined work based on this library.  Thus, the terms and
conditions of the GNU General Public License cover the whole
combination.
</code>
</p>
<p>
<code>
As a special exception, the copyright holders of this library give you
permission to link this library with independent modules to produce an
executable, regardless of the license terms of these independent
modules, and to copy and distribute the resulting executable under
terms of your choice, provided that you also meet, for each linked
independent module, the terms and conditions of the license of that
module.  An independent module is a module which is not derived from
or based on this library.  If you modify this library, you may extend
this exception to your version of the library, but you are not
obligated to do so.  If you do not wish to do so, delete this
exception statement from your version.
</code>
</p>
</blockquote>

</faq>

<faq question="Where can I find more about the GPL?">
Please check the FSF FAQ on the GNU GPL: <createlink name="http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html" url="http://www.fsf.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html">.
</faq>

<faq question="What does the exception allow me to do?">
<p>If you combine GNU Classpath <em>with independent modules to produce an
executable</em> you can <em>copy and distribute the resulting executable under
terms of your choice</em>.</p>

<p>So you can use and distribute GNU Classpath as is in your program without changing the license of your software.</p>
</faq>

<faq question="I have a question about licensing GNU Classpath. Who can I ask?">
Direct such questions to <a href="mailto:[e-mail]">[e-mail]</a>. The FSF is the
official copyright holder of Classpath and sets the distribution terms
</faq>

<faq question="How can I be sure that my application does not break the license?">
The FSF has a GPL-compliance lab which offers consulting services for
companies who are working to develop products that incorporate Free
Software so that they can do so in ways that comply with the terms of
the GPL and other Free Software licenses. If you are interested in this
service, please write to <a href="mailto:[e-mail]">[e-mail]</a>.
</faq>
</faq-section>

<faq-section name="Classpath Development">

<faq question="I would like to contribute, where shall I start?">
<p>See the <a
href="docs/">documentation page</a>, especially the <a
href="docs/hacking.html">GNU
Classpath Hacker&#x2019;s Guide</a>, and pick up a <createlink name="task" url="tasks.html"> from the list!
</faq>

<faq question="Can I look at source code distributed with other
implementations to get inspiration?">
If you are going to contribute source code to GNU Classpath we must
make sure that you have not studied the source code of the JDK/JRE or
decompiled any of its classes. Furthermore you must not have signed
any non-disclosure agreements with Sun or other companies in regard
with java technology that might cover the core class libaries or
tools. The reason for this requirement is that we want to make sure
that Sun or any other company cannot rightfully claim that GNU
Classpath infringes their copyright. You are therefore questioned
about your experience with other implementations of similar source
code and any agreements with companies you might have signed when you
request to contribute to GNU Classpath.
<p>
Please note that this does not mean you cannot help GNU Classpath at
all in such a case. Here is a list of things you can do instead:
<ul>
  <li>write Mauve test cases</li>
  <li>write example applications demonstrating the usage of the packages</li>
  <li>writing/fixing helper programs (like japitools) and scripts</li>
  <li>report bugs</li>
  <li>help fixing the documentation</li>
  <li>help in other related Free software projects
  (e.g. virtual machine development,
   <createlink name="GUMP" url="http://gump.apache.org/">)
</ul>
<p>
Here are some rough guidelines for deciding whether or not it would be
wise to accept a contribution from someone that studied source code
for another implementation of the core libraries or is under contract
with some company covering implementations of core library classes.
<p>
If the developer got access to the source code by signing some
contract (like the SCSL) with Sun then it would be best to examine
that contract (by FSF legal) before deciding.
<p>
If the developer just accidentally saw some of the source code and had
no intention (and didn't actually) study the implementation (with the
intention of contributing to GNU Classpath) there is no problem.
<p>
Studying a proprietary implementation with the intention of
implementing it (better) for GNU Classpath is a clear no-no.
<strong>The general rule is that if you have looked at or studied any
(proprietary) implementation of a package you should not work on that
package for GNU Classpath.</strong> That is because it would be
difficult to proof that you really did an independent
implementation. Since what you create might look very similar (which
is not unlikely). Working on something completely unrelated is OK (as
long as there are no contractual obligations with Sun or some other
company to not do this of course).
<p>
The important thing is that we want to be clear on the fact that we
created an independent implementation. We don't want to get into
tricky legal situations. We want to avoid risking to go to court over
reverse engineering or clean room situation questions if not
absolutely necessary. That is why we in general just say "please don't
contribute if you looked at other implementations". If someone thinks
that their actions might be explained as copying directly or
indirectly another (proprietary) implementation then that could be a
problem that we want to avoid.
<p>
FSF Legal will always advise not to take any unnecessary risks that
might endanger the (perceived) free software status of a GNU
project. (If we might need to go to court to proof that what we did
was OK, then don't!)
<p>
This isn't a GNU Classpath project specific issue.
See <createlink name="GNU: Reading Non-Free Code"
url="http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Reading-Non_002dFree-Code.html">.
</faq>

<faq question="I'm tainted by; can I help anyway?">
Even if you have seen Sun's source and you cannot contribute code to GNU Classpath, there are still many way you can help us.

Here's a few examples of contributions you can make that would greatly help us:
<ul>
<li>Mauve test cases
<li>Example programs for GNU Classpath
<li>Documentation fixes
<li>Help programs (e.g. japitools) and scripts
</ul>

In general, if you just accidentally saw some of the source code and had no intention (and didn't actually) study the implementation (with the intention of contributing to GNU Classpath), there is no problem.

In case of doubt, please refer to FSF legal.
</faq>

<faq question="Why do I have to give the copyright to the FSF?">
Some contributors of Classpath might be annoyed if their work was being
used under conditions that are not according to the terms of the license.
However, enforcing the license in court (if this was ever needed) would
be easier if the Free Software Foundation can claim to speak in the name
of all authors. For this reason, and for others that are specific to the
intellectual property system of the United States, GNU projects tend to
be a bit picky about getting signatures from all contributors. Please do
not see this as a personal offence.