⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 semaphore.c

📁 linux-2.6.15.6
💻 C
字号:
/* *  linux/arch/m32r/semaphore.c *    orig : i386 2.6.4 * *  M32R semaphore implementation. * *	Copyright (c) 2002 - 2004 Hitoshi Yamamoto *//* * i386 semaphore implementation. * * (C) Copyright 1999 Linus Torvalds * * Portions Copyright 1999 Red Hat, Inc. * *	This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or *	modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License *	as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version *	2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. * * rw semaphores implemented November 1999 by Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> */#include <linux/config.h>#include <linux/sched.h>#include <linux/err.h>#include <linux/init.h>#include <asm/semaphore.h>/* * Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter: * The "count" variable is decremented for each process * that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping" * variable is a count of such acquires. * * Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can * efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up * needs to do something only if count was negative before * the increment operation. * * "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected * by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head. * * Note that these functions are only called when there is * contention on the lock, and as such all this is the * "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The * critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h> * where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls. *//* * Logic: *  - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go *    from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up. *  - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we *    (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure *    that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that *    we cannot lose wakeup events. */asmlinkage void __up(struct semaphore *sem){	wake_up(&sem->wait);}asmlinkage void __sched __down(struct semaphore * sem){	struct task_struct *tsk = current;	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);	unsigned long flags;	tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);	add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);	sem->sleepers++;	for (;;) {		int sleepers = sem->sleepers;		/*		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't		 * playing, because we own the spinlock in		 * the wait_queue_head.		 */		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {			sem->sleepers = 0;			break;		}		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);		schedule();		spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);		tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;	}	remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);	wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;}asmlinkage int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore * sem){	int retval = 0;	struct task_struct *tsk = current;	DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);	unsigned long flags;	tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);	add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);	sem->sleepers++;	for (;;) {		int sleepers = sem->sleepers;		/*		 * With signals pending, this turns into		 * the trylock failure case - we won't be		 * sleeping, and we* can't get the lock as		 * it has contention. Just correct the count		 * and exit.		 */		if (signal_pending(current)) {			retval = -EINTR;			sem->sleepers = 0;			atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count);			break;		}		/*		 * Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't		 * playing, because we own the spinlock in		 * wait_queue_head. The "-1" is because we're		 * still hoping to get the semaphore.		 */		if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers - 1, &sem->count)) {			sem->sleepers = 0;			break;		}		sem->sleepers = 1;	/* us - see -1 above */		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);		schedule();		spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);		tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;	}	remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);	wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);	tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;	return retval;}/* * Trylock failed - make sure we correct for * having decremented the count. * * We could have done the trylock with a * single "cmpxchg" without failure cases, * but then it wouldn't work on a 386. */asmlinkage int __down_trylock(struct semaphore * sem){	int sleepers;	unsigned long flags;	spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);	sleepers = sem->sleepers + 1;	sem->sleepers = 0;	/*	 * Add "everybody else" and us into it. They aren't	 * playing, because we own the spinlock in the	 * wait_queue_head.	 */	if (!atomic_add_negative(sleepers, &sem->count)) {		wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);	}	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);	return 1;}

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -