uniondatatypevalidator.cpp
来自「IBM的解析xml的工具Xerces的源代码」· C++ 代码 · 共 475 行 · 第 1/2 页
CPP
475 行
XMLCh* key; XMLCh* value; RefHashTableOfEnumerator<KVStringPair> e(facets, false, manager); while (e.hasMoreElements()) { KVStringPair pair = e.nextElement(); key = pair.getKey(); value = pair.getValue(); if (XMLString::equals(key, SchemaSymbols::fgELT_PATTERN)) { setPattern(value); if (getPattern()) setFacetsDefined(DatatypeValidator::FACET_PATTERN); // do not construct regex until needed } else { ThrowXMLwithMemMgr1(InvalidDatatypeFacetException , XMLExcepts::FACET_Invalid_Tag , key , manager); } }//while /*** Schema constraint: Part I -- self checking ***/ // Nil /*** Schema constraint: Part II base vs derived checking ***/ // check 4.3.5.c0 must: enumeration values from the value space of base if ( ((getFacetsDefined() & DatatypeValidator::FACET_ENUMERATION) != 0) && (getEnumeration() !=0)) { int i = 0; int enumLength = getEnumeration()->size(); try { for ( ; i < enumLength; i++) { // ask parent do a complete check // // enum need NOT be passed this->checkContent() // since there are no other facets for Union, parent // checking is good enough. // baseValidator->validate(getEnumeration()->elementAt(i), (ValidationContext*)0, manager); } } catch ( XMLException& ) { ThrowXMLwithMemMgr1(InvalidDatatypeFacetException , XMLExcepts::FACET_enum_base , getEnumeration()->elementAt(i) , manager); } } }// End of Facet setting /*** Inherit facets from base.facets The reason of this inheriting (or copying values) is to ease schema constraint checking, so that we need NOT trace back to our very first base validator in the hierachy. Instead, we are pretty sure checking against immediate base validator is enough. ***/ UnionDatatypeValidator *pBaseValidator = (UnionDatatypeValidator*) baseValidator; // inherit enumeration if (((pBaseValidator->getFacetsDefined() & DatatypeValidator::FACET_ENUMERATION) !=0) && ((getFacetsDefined() & DatatypeValidator::FACET_ENUMERATION) == 0)) { setEnumeration(pBaseValidator->getEnumeration(), true); }}//// 1) the bottom level UnionDTV would check against// pattern and enumeration as well// 2) each UnionDTV(s) above the bottom level UnionDTV and// below the native UnionDTV (the top level DTV)// would check against pattern only.// 3) the natvie Union DTV (the top level DTV) would invoke// memberTypeValidator to validate//void UnionDatatypeValidator::checkContent(const XMLCh* const content , ValidationContext* const context , bool asBase , MemoryManager* const manager){ DatatypeValidator* bv = getBaseValidator(); if (bv) ((UnionDatatypeValidator*)bv)->checkContent(content, context, true, manager); else { // 3) native union type // check content against each member type validator in Union // report an error only in case content is not valid against all member datatypes. // bool memTypeValid = false; for ( unsigned int i = 0; i < fMemberTypeValidators->size(); ++i ) { if ( memTypeValid ) break; try { fMemberTypeValidators->elementAt(i)->validate(content, context, manager); memTypeValid = true; //set the validator of the type actually used to validate the content DatatypeValidator *dtv = fMemberTypeValidators->elementAt(i); fValidatedDatatype = dtv; // context will be null during schema construction if(context) context->setValidatingMemberType(dtv); } catch (XMLException&) { //absorbed } } // for if ( !memTypeValid ) { ThrowXMLwithMemMgr1(InvalidDatatypeValueException , XMLExcepts::VALUE_no_match_memberType , content , manager); //( "Content '"+content+"' does not match any union types" ); } } // 1) and 2). we check pattern first if ( (getFacetsDefined() & DatatypeValidator::FACET_PATTERN ) != 0 ) { // lazy construction if (getRegex() == 0) { try { setRegex(new (fMemoryManager) RegularExpression(getPattern(), SchemaSymbols::fgRegEx_XOption, fMemoryManager)); } catch (XMLException &e) { ThrowXMLwithMemMgr1(InvalidDatatypeValueException, XMLExcepts::RethrowError, e.getMessage(), manager); } } if (getRegex()->matches(content, manager) == false) { ThrowXMLwithMemMgr2(InvalidDatatypeValueException , XMLExcepts::VALUE_NotMatch_Pattern , content , getPattern() , manager); } } // if this is a base validator, we only need to check pattern facet // all other facet were inherited by the derived type if (asBase) return; if ((getFacetsDefined() & DatatypeValidator::FACET_ENUMERATION) != 0 && (getEnumeration() != 0)) { // If the content match (compare equal) any enumeration with // any of the member types, it is considerd valid. // RefVectorOf<DatatypeValidator>* memberDTV = getMemberTypeValidators(); RefArrayVectorOf<XMLCh>* tmpEnum = getEnumeration(); unsigned int memberTypeNumber = memberDTV->size(); unsigned int enumLength = tmpEnum->size(); for ( unsigned int memberIndex = 0; memberIndex < memberTypeNumber; ++memberIndex) { for ( unsigned int enumIndex = 0; enumIndex < enumLength; ++enumIndex) { try { if (memberDTV->elementAt(memberIndex)->compare(content, tmpEnum->elementAt(enumIndex), manager) == 0) return; } catch (XMLException&) { //absorbed } } // for enumIndex } // for memberIndex ThrowXMLwithMemMgr1(InvalidDatatypeValueException, XMLExcepts::VALUE_NotIn_Enumeration, content, manager); } // enumeration}//////int UnionDatatypeValidator::compare(const XMLCh* const lValue , const XMLCh* const rValue , MemoryManager* const manager){ RefVectorOf<DatatypeValidator>* memberDTV = getMemberTypeValidators(); unsigned int memberTypeNumber = memberDTV->size(); for ( unsigned int memberIndex = 0; memberIndex < memberTypeNumber; ++memberIndex) { if (memberDTV->elementAt(memberIndex)->compare(lValue, rValue, manager) ==0) return 0; } //REVISIT: what does it mean for UNION1 to be <less than> or <greater than> UNION2 ? // As long as -1 or +1 indicates an unequality, return either of them is ok. return -1;}const RefArrayVectorOf<XMLCh>* UnionDatatypeValidator::getEnumString() const{ return getEnumeration();}/*** * 2.5.1.3 Union datatypes * * The canonical-lexical-representation for a 穟nion
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?