📄 oc_cksum.s
字号:
/*| Copyright (c) 1988, 1993| The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.|| Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without| modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions| are met:| 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright| notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.| 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright| notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the| documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.| 3. All advertising materials mentioning features or use of this software| must display the following acknowledgement:| This product includes software developed by the University of| California, Berkeley and its contributors.| 4. Neither the name of the University nor the names of its contributors| may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software| without specific prior written permission.|| THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE REGENTS AND CONTRIBUTORS ``AS IS'' AND| ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE| IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE| ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE REGENTS OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE| FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL| DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS| OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION)| HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT| LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY| OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF| SUCH DAMAGE.|| @(#)oc_cksum.s 8.3 (Berkeley) 1/21/94||| oc_cksum: ones complement 16 bit checksum for MC68020.|| oc_cksum (buffer, count, strtval)|| Do a 16 bit one's complement sum of 'count' bytes from 'buffer'.| 'strtval' is the starting value of the sum (usually zero).|| It simplifies life in in_cksum if strtval can be >= 2^16.| This routine will work as long as strtval is < 2^31.|| Performance| -----------| This routine is intended for MC 68020s but should also work| for 68030s. It (deliberately) doesn't worry about the alignment| of the buffer so will only work on a 68010 if the buffer is| aligned on an even address. (Also, a routine written to use| 68010 "loop mode" would almost certainly be faster than this| code on a 68010).|| We don't worry about alignment because this routine is frequently| called with small counts: 20 bytes for IP header checksums and 40| bytes for TCP ack checksums. For these small counts, testing for| bad alignment adds ~10% to the per-call cost. Since, by the nature| of the kernel's allocator, the data we're called with is almost| always longword aligned, there is no benefit to this added cost| and we're better off letting the loop take a big performance hit| in the rare cases where we're handed an unaligned buffer.|| Loop unrolling constants of 2, 4, 8, 16, 32 and 64 times were| tested on random data on four different types of processors (see| list below -- 64 was the largest unrolling because anything more| overflows the 68020 Icache). On all the processors, the| throughput asymptote was located between 8 and 16 (closer to 8).| However, 16 was substantially better than 8 for small counts.| (It's clear why this happens for a count of 40: unroll-8 pays a| loop branch cost and unroll-16 doesn't. But the tests also showed| that 16 was better than 8 for a count of 20. It's not obvious to| me why.) So, since 16 was good for both large and small counts,| the loop below is unrolled 16 times.| | The processors tested and their average time to checksum 1024 bytes| of random data were:| Sun 3/50 (15MHz) 190 us/KB| Sun 3/180 (16.6MHz) 175 us/KB| Sun 3/60 (20MHz) 134 us/KB| Sun 3/280 (25MHz) 95 us/KB| | The cost of calling this routine was typically 10% of the per-| kilobyte cost. E.g., checksumming zero bytes on a 3/60 cost 9us| and each additional byte cost 125ns. With the high fixed cost,| it would clearly be a gain to "inline" this routine -- the| subroutine call adds 400% overhead to an IP header checksum.| However, in absolute terms, inlining would only gain 10us per| packet -- a 1% effect for a 1ms ethernet packet. This is not| enough gain to be worth the effort.*/ .data .asciz "@(#)$Header: oc_cksum.s,v 1.1 90/07/09 16:04:43 mike Exp $" .even .text .globl _oc_cksum_oc_cksum: movl sp@(4),a0 | get buffer ptr movl sp@(8),d1 | get byte count movl sp@(12),d0 | get starting value movl d2,sp@- | free a reg | test for possible 1, 2 or 3 bytes of excess at end | of buffer. The usual case is no excess (the usual | case is header checksums) so we give that the faster | 'not taken' leg of the compare. (We do the excess | first because we are about the trash the low order | bits of the count in d1.) btst #0,d1 jne L5 | if one or three bytes excess btst #1,d1 jne L7 | if two bytes excessL1: movl d1,d2 lsrl #6,d1 | make cnt into # of 64 byte chunks andl #0x3c,d2 | then find fractions of a chunk negl d2 andb #0xf,cc | clear X jmp pc@(L3-.-2:b,d2)L2: movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0 movl a0@+,d2 addxl d2,d0L3: dbra d1,L2 | (NB- dbra does not affect X) movl d0,d1 | fold 32 bit sum to 16 bits swap d1 | (NB- swap does not affect X) addxw d1,d0 jcc L4 addw #1,d0L4: andl #0xffff,d0 movl sp@+,d2 rtsL5: | deal with 1 or 3 excess bytes at the end of the buffer. btst #1,d1 jeq L6 | if 1 excess | 3 bytes excess clrl d2 movw a0@(-3,d1:l),d2 | add in last full word then drop addl d2,d0 | through to pick up last byteL6: | 1 byte excess clrl d2 movb a0@(-1,d1:l),d2 lsll #8,d2 addl d2,d0 jra L1L7: | 2 bytes excess clrl d2 movw a0@(-2,d1:l),d2 addl d2,d0 jra L1
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -