pathnode.c
来自「PostgreSQL7.4.6 for Linux」· C语言 代码 · 共 863 行 · 第 1/2 页
C
863 行
/*------------------------------------------------------------------------- * * pathnode.c * Routines to manipulate pathlists and create path nodes * * Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2003, PostgreSQL Global Development Group * Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California * * * IDENTIFICATION * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c,v 1.95 2003/08/04 02:40:01 momjian Exp $ * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */#include "postgres.h"#include <math.h>#include "catalog/pg_operator.h"#include "executor/executor.h"#include "miscadmin.h"#include "nodes/plannodes.h"#include "optimizer/cost.h"#include "optimizer/pathnode.h"#include "optimizer/paths.h"#include "optimizer/restrictinfo.h"#include "parser/parse_expr.h"#include "parser/parse_oper.h"#include "utils/memutils.h"#include "utils/selfuncs.h"#include "utils/syscache.h"static bool hash_safe_tlist(List *tlist);/***************************************************************************** * MISC. PATH UTILITIES *****************************************************************************//* * compare_path_costs * Return -1, 0, or +1 according as path1 is cheaper, the same cost, * or more expensive than path2 for the specified criterion. */intcompare_path_costs(Path *path1, Path *path2, CostSelector criterion){ if (criterion == STARTUP_COST) { if (path1->startup_cost < path2->startup_cost) return -1; if (path1->startup_cost > path2->startup_cost) return +1; /* * If paths have the same startup cost (not at all unlikely), * order them by total cost. */ if (path1->total_cost < path2->total_cost) return -1; if (path1->total_cost > path2->total_cost) return +1; } else { if (path1->total_cost < path2->total_cost) return -1; if (path1->total_cost > path2->total_cost) return +1; /* * If paths have the same total cost, order them by startup cost. */ if (path1->startup_cost < path2->startup_cost) return -1; if (path1->startup_cost > path2->startup_cost) return +1; } return 0;}/* * compare_path_fractional_costs * Return -1, 0, or +1 according as path1 is cheaper, the same cost, * or more expensive than path2 for fetching the specified fraction * of the total tuples. * * If fraction is <= 0 or > 1, we interpret it as 1, ie, we select the * path with the cheaper total_cost. */intcompare_fractional_path_costs(Path *path1, Path *path2, double fraction){ Cost cost1, cost2; if (fraction <= 0.0 || fraction >= 1.0) return compare_path_costs(path1, path2, TOTAL_COST); cost1 = path1->startup_cost + fraction * (path1->total_cost - path1->startup_cost); cost2 = path2->startup_cost + fraction * (path2->total_cost - path2->startup_cost); if (cost1 < cost2) return -1; if (cost1 > cost2) return +1; return 0;}/* * set_cheapest * Find the minimum-cost paths from among a relation's paths, * and save them in the rel's cheapest-path fields. * * This is normally called only after we've finished constructing the path * list for the rel node. * * If we find two paths of identical costs, try to keep the better-sorted one. * The paths might have unrelated sort orderings, in which case we can only * guess which might be better to keep, but if one is superior then we * definitely should keep it. */voidset_cheapest(RelOptInfo *parent_rel){ List *pathlist = parent_rel->pathlist; List *p; Path *cheapest_startup_path; Path *cheapest_total_path; Assert(IsA(parent_rel, RelOptInfo)); if (pathlist == NIL) elog(ERROR, "could not devise a query plan for the given query"); cheapest_startup_path = cheapest_total_path = (Path *) lfirst(pathlist); foreach(p, lnext(pathlist)) { Path *path = (Path *) lfirst(p); int cmp; cmp = compare_path_costs(cheapest_startup_path, path, STARTUP_COST); if (cmp > 0 || (cmp == 0 && compare_pathkeys(cheapest_startup_path->pathkeys, path->pathkeys) == PATHKEYS_BETTER2)) cheapest_startup_path = path; cmp = compare_path_costs(cheapest_total_path, path, TOTAL_COST); if (cmp > 0 || (cmp == 0 && compare_pathkeys(cheapest_total_path->pathkeys, path->pathkeys) == PATHKEYS_BETTER2)) cheapest_total_path = path; } parent_rel->cheapest_startup_path = cheapest_startup_path; parent_rel->cheapest_total_path = cheapest_total_path; parent_rel->cheapest_unique_path = NULL; /* computed only if needed */}/* * add_path * Consider a potential implementation path for the specified parent rel, * and add it to the rel's pathlist if it is worthy of consideration. * A path is worthy if it has either a better sort order (better pathkeys) * or cheaper cost (on either dimension) than any of the existing old paths. * * Unless parent_rel->pruneable is false, we also remove from the rel's * pathlist any old paths that are dominated by new_path --- that is, * new_path is both cheaper and at least as well ordered. * * The pathlist is kept sorted by TOTAL_COST metric, with cheaper paths * at the front. No code depends on that for correctness; it's simply * a speed hack within this routine. Doing it that way makes it more * likely that we will reject an inferior path after a few comparisons, * rather than many comparisons. * * NOTE: discarded Path objects are immediately pfree'd to reduce planner * memory consumption. We dare not try to free the substructure of a Path, * since much of it may be shared with other Paths or the query tree itself; * but just recycling discarded Path nodes is a very useful savings in * a large join tree. We can recycle the List nodes of pathlist, too. * * 'parent_rel' is the relation entry to which the path corresponds. * 'new_path' is a potential path for parent_rel. * * Returns nothing, but modifies parent_rel->pathlist. */voidadd_path(RelOptInfo *parent_rel, Path *new_path){ bool accept_new = true; /* unless we find a superior old * path */ List *insert_after = NIL; /* where to insert new item */ List *p1_prev = NIL; List *p1; /* * Loop to check proposed new path against old paths. Note it is * possible for more than one old path to be tossed out because * new_path dominates it. */ p1 = parent_rel->pathlist; /* cannot use foreach here */ while (p1 != NIL) { Path *old_path = (Path *) lfirst(p1); bool remove_old = false; /* unless new proves superior */ int costcmp; costcmp = compare_path_costs(new_path, old_path, TOTAL_COST); /* * If the two paths compare differently for startup and total * cost, then we want to keep both, and we can skip the (much * slower) comparison of pathkeys. If they compare the same, * proceed with the pathkeys comparison. Note: this test relies * on the fact that compare_path_costs will only return 0 if both * costs are equal (and, therefore, there's no need to call it * twice in that case). */ if (costcmp == 0 || costcmp == compare_path_costs(new_path, old_path, STARTUP_COST)) { switch (compare_pathkeys(new_path->pathkeys, old_path->pathkeys)) { case PATHKEYS_EQUAL: if (costcmp < 0) remove_old = true; /* new dominates old */ else accept_new = false; /* old equals or dominates * new */ break; case PATHKEYS_BETTER1: if (costcmp <= 0) remove_old = true; /* new dominates old */ break; case PATHKEYS_BETTER2: if (costcmp >= 0) accept_new = false; /* old dominates new */ break; case PATHKEYS_DIFFERENT: /* keep both paths, since they have different ordering */ break; } } /* * Remove current element from pathlist if dominated by new, * unless xfunc told us not to remove any paths. */ if (remove_old && parent_rel->pruneable) { List *p1_next = lnext(p1); if (p1_prev) lnext(p1_prev) = p1_next; else parent_rel->pathlist = p1_next; pfree(old_path); pfree(p1); /* this is why we can't use foreach */ p1 = p1_next; } else { /* new belongs after this old path if it has cost >= old's */ if (costcmp >= 0) insert_after = p1; p1_prev = p1; p1 = lnext(p1); } /* * If we found an old path that dominates new_path, we can quit * scanning the pathlist; we will not add new_path, and we assume * new_path cannot dominate any other elements of the pathlist. */ if (!accept_new) break; } if (accept_new) { /* Accept the new path: insert it at proper place in pathlist */ if (insert_after) lnext(insert_after) = lcons(new_path, lnext(insert_after)); else parent_rel->pathlist = lcons(new_path, parent_rel->pathlist); } else { /* Reject and recycle the new path */ pfree(new_path); }}/***************************************************************************** * PATH NODE CREATION ROUTINES *****************************************************************************//* * create_seqscan_path * Creates a path corresponding to a sequential scan, returning the * pathnode. */Path *create_seqscan_path(Query *root, RelOptInfo *rel){ Path *pathnode = makeNode(Path); pathnode->pathtype = T_SeqScan; pathnode->parent = rel; pathnode->pathkeys = NIL; /* seqscan has unordered result */ cost_seqscan(pathnode, root, rel); return pathnode;}/* * create_index_path * Creates a path node for an index scan. * * 'rel' is the parent rel * 'index' is an index on 'rel' * 'restriction_clauses' is a list of lists of RestrictInfo nodes * to be used as index qual conditions in the scan. * 'pathkeys' describes the ordering of the path. * 'indexscandir' is ForwardScanDirection or BackwardScanDirection * for an ordered index, or NoMovementScanDirection for * an unordered index. * * Returns the new path node. */IndexPath *create_index_path(Query *root, RelOptInfo *rel, IndexOptInfo *index, List *restriction_clauses, List *pathkeys, ScanDirection indexscandir){ IndexPath *pathnode = makeNode(IndexPath); List *indexquals; pathnode->path.pathtype = T_IndexScan; pathnode->path.parent = rel; pathnode->path.pathkeys = pathkeys; /* Convert RestrictInfo nodes to indexquals the executor can handle */ indexquals = expand_indexqual_conditions(index, restriction_clauses); /* * We are making a pathnode for a single-scan indexscan; therefore, * both indexinfo and indexqual should be single-element lists. */ pathnode->indexinfo = makeList1(index); pathnode->indexqual = makeList1(indexquals); /* It's not an innerjoin path. */ pathnode->indexjoinclauses = NIL; pathnode->indexscandir = indexscandir; /* * The number of rows is the same as the parent rel's estimate, since * this isn't a join inner indexscan. */ pathnode->rows = rel->rows; /* * Not sure if this is necessary, but it should help if the statistics * are too far off */ if (index->indpred && index->tuples < pathnode->rows) pathnode->rows = index->tuples; cost_index(&pathnode->path, root, rel, index, indexquals, false); return pathnode;}/* * create_tidscan_path * Creates a path corresponding to a tid_direct scan, returning the * pathnode. */TidPath *create_tidscan_path(Query *root, RelOptInfo *rel, List *tideval){ TidPath *pathnode = makeNode(TidPath); pathnode->path.pathtype = T_TidScan; pathnode->path.parent = rel; pathnode->path.pathkeys = NIL; pathnode->tideval = tideval; cost_tidscan(&pathnode->path, root, rel, tideval); /* * divide selectivity for each clause to get an equal selectivity as * IndexScan does OK ? */ return pathnode;}/* * create_append_path * Creates a path corresponding to an Append plan, returning the * pathnode. */AppendPath *create_append_path(RelOptInfo *rel, List *subpaths){ AppendPath *pathnode = makeNode(AppendPath); List *l; pathnode->path.pathtype = T_Append; pathnode->path.parent = rel; pathnode->path.pathkeys = NIL; /* result is always considered * unsorted */ pathnode->subpaths = subpaths; pathnode->path.startup_cost = 0; pathnode->path.total_cost = 0; foreach(l, subpaths)
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?