📄 gist.sgml
字号:
<!--$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/gist.sgml,v 1.13 2003/10/31 22:41:21 tgl Exp $--><chapter Id="GiST"><title>GiST Indexes</title><sect1 id="intro"> <title>Introduction</title> <para> <acronym>GiST</acronym> stands for Generalized Search Tree. It is a balanced, tree-structured access method, that acts as a base template in which to implement arbitrary indexing schemes. B+-trees, R-trees and many other indexing schemes can be implemented in <acronym>GiST</acronym>. </para> <para> One advantage of <acronym>GiST</acronym> is that it allows the development of custom data types with the appropriate access methods, by an expert in the domain of the data type, rather than a database expert. </para> <para> Some of the information here is derived from <ulink url="http://gist.cs.berkeley.edu/">the University of California at Berkeley's GiST Indexing Project web site</ulink> and Marcel Kornacker's thesis, <ulink url="http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/448594.html">Access Methods for Next-Generation Database Systems</ulink>. The <acronym>GiST</acronym> implementation in <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> is primarily maintained by Teodor Sigaev and Oleg Bartunov, and there is more information on their website: <ulink url="http://www.sai.msu.su/~megera/postgres/gist/"></>. </para></sect1><sect1 id="extensibility"> <title>Extensibility</title> <para> Traditionally, implementing a new index access method meant a lot of difficult work. It was necessary to understand the inner workings of the database, such as the lock manager and Write-Ahead Log. The <acronym>GiST</acronym> interface has a high level of abstraction, requiring the access method implementor to only implement the semantics of the data type being accessed. The <acronym>GiST</acronym> layer itself takes care of concurrency, logging and searching the tree structure. </para> <para> This extensibility should not be confused with the extensibility of the other standard search trees in terms of the data they can handle. For example, <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> supports extensible B+-trees and R-trees. That means that you can use <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> to build a B+-tree or R-tree over any data type you want. But B+-trees only support range predicates (<literal><</literal>, <literal>=</literal>, <literal>></literal>), and R-trees only support n-D range queries (contains, contained, equals). </para> <para> So if you index, say, an image collection with a <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> B+-tree, you can only issue queries such as <quote>is imagex equal to imagey</quote>, <quote>is imagex less than imagey</quote> and <quote>is imagex greater than imagey</quote>? Depending on how you define <quote>equals</quote>, <quote>less than</quote> and <quote>greater than</quote> in this context, this could be useful. However, by using a <acronym>GiST</acronym> based index, you could create ways to ask domain-specific questions, perhaps <quote>find all images of horses</quote> or <quote>find all over-exposed images</quote>. </para> <para> All it takes to get a <acronym>GiST</acronym> access method up and running is to implement seven user-defined methods, which define the behavior of keys in the tree. Of course these methods have to be pretty fancy to support fancy queries, but for all the standard queries (B+-trees, R-trees, etc.) they're relatively straightforward. In short, <acronym>GiST</acronym> combines extensibility along with generality, code reuse, and a clean interface. </para></sect1><sect1 id="implementation"> <title>Implementation</title> <para> There are seven methods that an index operator class for <acronym>GiST</acronym> must provide: </para> <variablelist> <varlistentry> <term>consistent</term> <listitem> <para> Given a predicate <literal>p</literal> on a tree page, and a user query, <literal>q</literal>, this method will return false if it is certain that both <literal>p</literal> and <literal>q</literal> cannot be true for a given data item. </para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>union</term> <listitem> <para> This method consolidates information in the tree. Given a set of entries, this function generates a new predicate that is true for all the entries. </para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>compress</term> <listitem> <para> Converts the data item into a format suitable for physical storage in an index page. </para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>decompress</term> <listitem> <para> The reverse of the <function>compress</function> method. Converts the index representation of the data item into a format that can be manipulated by the database. </para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>penalty</term> <listitem> <para> Returns a value indicating the <quote>cost</quote> of inserting the new entry into a particular branch of the tree. items will be inserted down the path of least <function>penalty</function> in the tree. </para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>picksplit</term> <listitem> <para> When a page split is necessary, this function decides which entries on the page are to stay on the old page, and which are to move to the new page. </para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>same</term> <listitem> <para> Returns true if two entries are identical, false otherwise. </para> </listitem> </varlistentry> </variablelist></sect1><sect1 id="limitations"> <title>Limitations</title> <para> The current implementation of <acronym>GiST</acronym> within <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> has some major limitations: <acronym>GiST</acronym> access is not concurrent; the <acronym>GiST</acronym> interface doesn't allow the development of certain data types, such as digital trees (see papers by Aoki et al); and there is not yet any support for write-ahead logging of updates in <acronym>GiST</acronym> indexes. </para> <para> Solutions to the concurrency problems appear in Marcel Kornacker's thesis; however these ideas have not yet been put into practice in the <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> implementation. </para> <para> The lack of write-ahead logging is just a small matter of programming, but since it isn't done yet, a crash could render a <acronym>GiST</acronym> index inconsistent, forcing a REINDEX. </para></sect1><sect1 id="examples"> <title>Examples</title> <para> To see example implementations of index methods implemented using <acronym>GiST</acronym>, examine the following contrib modules: </para> <variablelist> <varlistentry> <term>btree_gist</term> <listitem> <para>B-Tree</para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>cube</term> <listitem> <para>Indexing for multi-dimensional cubes</para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>intarray</term> <listitem> <para>RD-Tree for one-dimensional array of int4 values</para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>ltree</term> <listitem> <para>Indexing for tree-like stuctures</para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>rtree_gist</term> <listitem> <para>R-Tree</para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>seg</term> <listitem> <para>Storage and indexed access for <quote>float ranges</quote></para> </listitem> </varlistentry> <varlistentry> <term>tsearch and tsearch2</term> <listitem> <para>Full text indexing</para> </listitem> </varlistentry> </variablelist></sect1></chapter>
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -