📄 00000275.htm
字号:
while Linux still requires many behaviors to be configured via <BR> hand-edited text files. <BR> <BR> The most important difference, though, is the potential that BeOS has <BR> to offer as a result of its "fresh start" approach. Linux is awesome <BR> in many ways, but no matter how you slice it, it's still basically an <BR> evolved port of a 20+ year-old operating system, and with that age <BR> comes a certain amount of baggage. Linux may be far more efficient <BR> than Windows, but it still carries the past on its shoulders, and <BR> (more importantly) lacks many of the futuristic technologies built <BR> into BeOS from the start. For example, the ease and elegance of <BR> data-sharing between BeOS applications via BMessages, the built-in <BR> scriptability of all BeOS applications, the ability of the system to <BR> take maximum advantage of any number of CPUs without developers having <BR> to specifically code in multi-proc support, the extensibility of the <BR> entire operating system via plug-ins ("known as Add-Ons")... I could <BR> go on, but you should read Be's whitepaper, The MediaOS to learn more. <BR> <BR> All of BeOS's amazing technology comes at a price though -- Be has to <BR> cut a swath through the jungle of an entrenched industry, develop an <BR> installed base of users, support the hardware out there, and make it <BR> as easy and fruitful as possible for developers to make a living <BR> writing BeOS software -- all things that Linux already has under its <BR> belt. <BR> <BR>Common Ground <BR> <BR> If the point isn't clear as glass by now, I'll say it outright: BeOS <BR> and Linux complement one another, and make for great kissin' cousins <BR> on any hard drive. Both seem to pick up nicely where the other leaves <BR> off. The days of thinking "one computer, one operating system" are <BR> over, and ecosystems thrive best under biologically diverse <BR> conditions. Linux is more mature, has more applications (right now), <BR> and supports more hardware. BeOS is lighter on its feet, has way more <BR> exciting technology, offers a far more pleasant "out of box" <BR> experience, and is supported by a company with an infrastructure as <BR> logical and lightweight as the operating system they build. <BR> <BR> You want my honest personal opinion? (As if you didn't already know). <BR> I enjoy using BeOS a lot more than Linux, even though there's still <BR> wet cement in some places. At the same time, I'd run my Web sites from <BR> a Linux server before I'd run them from a BeOS machine at this point <BR> in the game. Linux is a Land Rover and BeOS is a Maserati. The cool <BR> thing is, with Linux being free (though installation CDs and manuals <BR> with enhanced distributions run around $30) and BeOS still $69, just <BR> about anyone can afford to run both for about the same cost as a <BR> single Windows 98 upgrade (while NT Workstation runs around $319). <BR> <BR> Want to compare these cousins at a glance? I've constructed a BeOS / <BR> Linux technology comparison chart for quick reference. <BR>Random Notes <BR> <BR> * Version 3.1 of BeOS was released last month and provides broader <BR> hardware support, the first appearance of a serial port <BR> preferences application, and an experimental graphics acceleration <BR> tool for Pentium Pro and Pentium II machines. See PC Magazine's <BR> review. <BR> * A benefactor has emerged from the shadows to assist BeOS <BR> developers in bringing their applications to maturity with a BeOS <BR> venture capital fund. See the BeFund's first newsletter. <BR> * Two of the best BeOS news sites have merged into a single <BR> powerhouse -- BeOS Central and Believe are now one entity, called <BR> BeOS Central. BeLeadingEdge and BeForever continue to thrive. <BR> * BeTrieve now provides an alternate download source for BeOS <BR> applications and software. <BR> * Software, software, software. See Be's BeWare section to browse <BR> the collection of available applications. <BR> <BR>===================End of post, and.....readers' stuff================== <BR> _________________________________________________________________ <BR> <BR> Comments from Readers: <BR> <BR> Andy Tai - Subject: Author is biased toward BeOS (1998-12-08 19:29:47) <BR> The author is clearly pro-BeOS. The article can be written as a <BR> comparsion between BeOS and any Unix-like OS. <BR> But no matter, since Linux is Free Software/Open Source, any features <BR> of BeOs that are good can be cloned. Only a matter of time. <BR> <BR> Chris - Subject: He is biased, but BeOS is nice :) (1998-12-08 <BR> 22:56:53) <BR> Yes, the article is obviously biased. (aren't all articles biased?) If <BR> you read the comparision chart, the wording is rather skewed as well. <BR> But, personally, I'd still rather use BeOS as my workstation and my <BR> Linux box as the server. BeOS is a very nice OS. <BR> Chris <BR> <BR> Zygo Blaxell - Subject: Author is an OS pundit wannabe (1998-12-09 <BR> 13:41:18) <BR> "Under no other operating system <BR> can you launch eight QuickTime movies <BR> simultaneously, then going to read your e-mail, <BR> format a floppy, and decompress a zipped backup all <BR> at once and have the system still respond to your next <BR> mouse click with little delay." <BR> That sounded like a challenge. <BR> (typing noises..."6...7...8...OK, now email...hmmm...does a cpio.gz <BR>
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -