📄 00000275.htm
字号:
compliance stamp). Both systems enjoy the many fruits of the open <BR> software model, although in Linux' case this fact extends to the <BR> operating system itself, whereas BeOS is a proprietary system that can <BR> easily run recompiled open source software. Unlike on MacOS and <BR> Windows, many BeOS and Linux programs are distributed along with <BR> source code and an invitation to users to improve and redistribute the <BR> software. A compiler and development environment is included with <BR> every copy of BeOS, and is considered standard fare in Linux <BR> distributions. <BR> <BR>Differences <BR> <BR> Linux has been employed in the public sector for quite a few more <BR> years than BeOS, and has sheer numbers on its side. Thousands of <BR> programmers have contributed to the collective Linux code base, and as <BR> a result, Linux has a huge wealth of mature applications and hardware <BR> support that BeOS does not yet enjoy. Be is no longer a snot-nosed <BR> startup, but neither is it a huge, entrenched, disconnected company <BR> like Microsoft, Apple, or IBM. Be currently has around 70 employees, <BR> but labored behind locked doors as a much smaller team for half of its <BR> life. Both hardware and application support are huge priorities for <BR> Be, but these things take time no matter who you are. Still, Be has <BR> already managed to build support for an impressive array of the most <BR> common PC hardware, and new BeOS applications and utilities emerge <BR> daily. <BR> <BR> There are advantages and disadvantages to having a parent company <BR> running the show (BeOS is created and owned by Be, Inc.; Linux is <BR> created by the people, for the people). For one, a parent company <BR> guarantees a consistency of interface and API that's difficult if not <BR> impossible to match when thousands of people are trying to reach <BR> consensus (or worse, all doing things differently), as often happens <BR> in the Linux world. And while support has never been a problem in the <BR> Linux space, CEOs tend to perceive a problem with Linux support; an <BR> illusion with which Be won't have to grapple. Many Linux users <BR> appreciate their lack of corporate infrastructure -- they know their <BR> system isn't subject to the whims of the market, nor can it be <BR> affected by unfortunate managerial decisions. On the other hand, BeOS <BR> users have a single, unified point of contact, an official vision from <BR> a single entity. The corporate structure puts all the vision under one <BR> roof. It may not be democratic, but it's clean and efficient. <BR> <BR> In terms of audience, Be decisively targets the media creator and <BR> consumer (an increasingly large and important part of daily computing <BR> life), while Linux largely inherits Unix' role as a high-powered <BR> programming, data-crunching, and serving platform. Many Linux users <BR> thrive on the chaotic nature of their platform, and the Linux culture <BR> in general often bristles with revolutionary fervor (though there are <BR> office secretaries out there using Linux too!). Many BeOS users are <BR> adamantly anti-Microsoft, but far fewer are anti-corporation. Most are <BR> simply excited by BeOS' amazing technology. While many Linux users <BR> want to destroy Redmond, Be's strategy is one of peaceful coexistence; <BR> Be knows that users have a need for multiple operating systems on <BR> their hard drives, and have no interest in "mooning the ogre," as <BR> Jean-Louis puts it. <BR> <BR> Speaking of technology, BeOS and Linux are fundamentally different in <BR> inception and execution. Linux boots to the command line, and the <BR> optional GUI is bolted on top, while BeOS can only be booted into the <BR> GUI -- its bash command line is run from the integrated Terminal <BR> application. BeOS is known for incredibly fast boot and application <BR> launch speeds: the machine I'm writing on boots BeOS in eight seconds, <BR> Linux in 70 seconds. Similarly, no BeOS application takes longer than <BR> two seconds to launch on this machine; not so for Linux. On the other <BR> hand, the fact that Linux can be hacked and modified to suit the needs <BR> of a particular situation is one of the reasons why ISPs choose Linux <BR> more than any other single OS. Linux is a fine-tuned network serving <BR> system, while BeOS is a fine-tuned desktop and workstation OS. <BR> Technologically and operationally, BeOS and Linux are different enough <BR> to make comparisons almost pointless. <BR> <BR> In the realm of hard-core networking, Linux wins hands-down and <BR> probably will continue to do so for some time to come -- the finely <BR> tuned Apache Web Server still powers the majority of the world's Web <BR> sites. On the other hand, setting up and working with BeOS networking <BR> is leagues more intuitive than it is under Linux. BeOS includes a <BR> bundled personal Web server (called PoorMan) capable of dishing up <BR> low-to-medium traffic sites, while RedHat Linux comes with the <BR> industrial-strength Apache. Be will continue to advance its networking <BR> capabilities, but they won't prioritize it as Linux devotees have. <BR> Instead of trying to fight well-established markets, Be puts their <BR> energies where they can win -- on high-demand multimedia and radical <BR> multitasking. By doing so, Be has created a system that stays <BR> responsive under multitasking loads that would crumble other OSes. <BR> Under no other operating system can you launch eight QuickTime movies <BR> simultaneously, then going to read your e-mail, format a floppy, and <BR> decompress a zipped backup all at once and have the system still <BR> respond to your next mouse click with little delay. <BR> <BR> Installation and configuration is another arena of difference. It's <BR> not uncommon for people to start with a Windows-only system, <BR> repartition their hard disk, install BeOS, and be using it for the <BR> first time in 15 minutes flat. Linux installation has made great leaps <BR> recently, but even RedHat 5 (widely considered the easiest Linux <BR> installation available) took me far longer than that to get up and <BR> running, and required more consultation of documentation. 99% of BeOS <BR> behaviors and preferences are tweaked via user-friendly GUI applets, <BR>
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -