📄 00000231.htm
字号:
<HTML><HEAD> <TITLE>BBS水木清华站∶精华区</TITLE></HEAD><BODY><CENTER><H1>BBS水木清华站∶精华区</H1></CENTER>发信人: vertex (lancelord), 信区: Linux <BR>标 题: Linux Virtual Server & Turbo Linux Cluster <BR>发信站: BBS 水木清华站 (Fri Oct 29 09:09:41 1999) <BR> <BR> <BR>下面是 LVS 的作者 zhang wensong 对 TL 公司的TL cluster的一些看法. <BR>可以看出 TL 公司在这件事情上确实没有显示出是一个完全按照 GPL的方法 <BR>来办事的公司. <BR> <BR>自由软件可以作商物..但也要遵守 Free World 的原则. <BR> <BR>Well, back to the TurboLinux Cluster topic. I really dislike the tricks <BR>the they played in their TurboCluster product. They first demostrated <BR>the TurboCluster web server in LinuxWorld in San Francisco in March and <BR>announces that it was their own first clustering technology, without <BR>mentioning a word that TurboCluster is based on LVS. Although Cliff <BR>Miller, CEO of PHT, apologized once, they still did the same thing in <BR>the later demo and news press. After a few discussions were raised on <BR>the Linux-HA mailing list in this May, they added an Acknowledgement <BR>in their TurboCluster web page. Something on the page is probably not <BR>true, <BR> "The first few beta versions of TCS were actually based <BR> on the Linux Virtual Server Project code. Although we <BR> have since completely rewritten our product, we are proud <BR> to acknowledge the efforts that inspired our own project. " <BR>That statements has last for 5 months, however Mike <<A HREF="mailto:wanger@redhat.com>">wanger@redhat.com></A> <BR>told me that they used the exact patch from LVS project at the end of <BR>this September. I haven't looked at their patch myself, because I have <BR>failed to download the patch from their site over ten times. The reason <BR>that I didn't stand up against their act after May is that I am not <BR>good at arguing and I would rather spend more time coding and some <BR>work that interest me. Anyway, I will download their patch this time, <BR>and check what exactly they have done. <BR> <BR>I agree to what Stephen said. I don't think TurboLinux have technical <BR>accumulation to provide a "forked" Linux. Look at their community site <BR>(<A HREF="http://community.turbolinux.com/),">http://community.turbolinux.com/),</A> the TurboCluster is the only <BR>R&D product that they offer to the community, however it is not in GPL <BR>and they played the trick on the LVS. I see TurboLinux wants to be <BR>great in the Linux community, it's good, but they don't do it in the <BR>right way. The trick they played will finally destroy their own <BR>reputation. They should spend more time doing some really good works. <BR>In fact, we are not sympathized, but they are. <BR> <BR>Wensong <BR> <BR> <BR>-- <BR>※ 来源:·BBS 水木清华站 bbs.net.tsinghua.edu.cn·[FROM: 162.105.138.50] <BR><CENTER><H1>BBS水木清华站∶精华区</H1></CENTER></BODY></HTML>
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -