📄 00000040.htm
字号:
<HTML><HEAD> <TITLE>BBS水木清华站∶精华区</TITLE></HEAD><BODY><CENTER><H1>BBS水木清华站∶精华区</H1></CENTER>发信人: raner (毕设好无聊呀!), 信区: Linux <BR>标 题: 关于Linux Standard Base Project <BR>发信站: BBS 水木清华站 (Sun May 24 11:01:24 1998) <BR> <BR> <BR> 关于为什么要有Linux Standard Base (LSB) project的一篇文章,在freshmeat.net <BR> 看到的. 我觉得确实很有必要将Linux来个统一, 象现在不同distribution四分五裂 <BR> 确实很难受, 至少Linux的Base系统要保证一致. 看来这个问题有望解决 :-)) <BR> <BR> freshmeat forum网址: <A HREF="http://freshmeat.net/forum">http://freshmeat.net/forum</A> <BR> LSB forum website: <A HREF="http://freshmeat.net/forum?mode=threads&forum=lsb">http://freshmeat.net/forum?mode=threads&forum=lsb</A> <BR> <BR>editorial <BR> <BR> From: Larry Augustin, Director Linux International, <BR> President VA Research Inc. <BR> <BR> The most serious threat facing Linux today is not Windows, Solaris, <BR> or any other operating system. <BR> <BR> The most serious threat facing Linux today is Linux. <BR> <BR> Linux is winning. Major companies are running mission critical aps on <BR> Linux. Software vendors are porting to Linux at a frenetic rate. <BR> Linux is already the number one Unix in Germany. Linux is 13% of the <BR> worldwide Unix market. <BR> <BR> The one thing that can stop Linux now is us. We can kill Linux by <BR> allowing it to become fractured like the rest of the Unix market. It <BR> must be the case that a binary application built for one Linux <BR> distribution will run on all distributions. Otherwise, we face the <BR> problem of convincing a vendor to port to each of Debian, Red Hat, <BR> SuSE, Caldera, Slackware, Stampede, etc. instead of Linux. If we have <BR> to do that Linux is doomed to fail. <BR> <BR> Further, binary compatibility must persist across several generations. <BR> If someone bought Bentley Microstation last year for Red Hat 4.2 it <BR> must run on 5.0 today, 5.1 next week and 6.0 next year. Not to mention <BR> Debian, SuSE, Caldera, Slackware, Stampede, etc. <BR> <BR> How many of you have special versions of libc installed to run <BR> Netscape or StarOffice? What other aps to you have installed that <BR> need their own libc? It can't go on like this. We must do something <BR> NOW. <BR> <BR> There are two parts to the steps we must take. <BR> <BR> The first part is technical. Technical changes are always the easiest <BR> kind of change. The people who make Linux happen, the people with the <BR> technical skills, must find ways to improve binary compatibility. <BR> Maybe that means a smarter ld.so. Maybe it means more info in the <BR> binary format. Maybe it means changes to the way libraries are <BR> organized. I don't have the answers, but I know that somewhere out <BR> there are smart people that do have the answers, and I'm willing to <BR> support them in any way I can. That's what makes Linux great. <BR> <BR> The second part is harder. The second part is social. The Linux <BR> community must recognize that there is a problem. We must work <BR> together to find solutions to the problem, whether those solutions are <BR> standards like the LSB project or technical solutions like most of us <BR> are comfortable with. <BR> <BR> The Linux Standard Base (LSB) project headed by Bruce Parens is a <BR> first step. It has a long way to go. But it gives us a framework to <BR> work in. It can evolve to whatever we need to solve the problem at <BR> hand, the problem of compatibility. <BR> <BR>-- <BR>※ 来源:·BBS 水木清华站 bbs.net.tsinghua.edu.cn·[FROM: 166.111.68.98] <BR><CENTER><H1>BBS水木清华站∶精华区</H1></CENTER></BODY></HTML>
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -