📄 00000042.htm
字号:
moderate modifications needed. The modification process was rather <BR> helter-skelter at first and in part done in a way causing bad <BR> feelings, but things have stabilized by now technically, and we <BR> witness that the bad feelings and flame wars occasioned by the <BR> alienations have more or less died down by now. <BR> Both Linux and GNU aim to be superior standard-compliant components, <BR> and they make a great combination. <BR> [ Reply to this ] <BR> * He didn't distort it by Piotr Mitros on 1999-12-15 15:38:41 <BR> ____________________________________________________ <BR> <BR> RMS and the name of the OS <BR> GusTheGhost Nov 26 at 09:53 PM <BR> Just as we allow the discoverer of a biological species to name it, <BR> and the discoverer of a comet to name it, why don't we allow Linus to <BR> name his system Linux? Just as RMS calls his editor GNU/Emacs. He can <BR> call it whatever he wants. He should NOT be allowed to demand the GNU <BR> prefix on the name Linux. RMS would be very offended if Linus demanded <BR> he change the name of GNU/Emacs to Spasibo/Emacs. <BR> [ Reply to this ] <BR> * Re: RMS and the name of the OS by Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho on <BR> 1999-11-27 05:00:35 <BR> ____________________________________________________ <BR> <BR> The goal of GNU was to replace UNIX <BR> Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho Nov 27 at 04:52 AM <BR> <A HREF="http://www.iki.fi/gaia/">http://www.iki.fi/gaia/</A> <BR> [Ed: One of the goals of the GNU project was to have replacements for <BR> the common Unix tools -- the <BR> commands mentioned here are some of these tools.] <BR> <BR> The original sole goal of GNU was to write a free superior version of <BR> UNIX. Writing the common tools was a means to this end, not a goal in <BR> itself. <BR> [ Reply to this ] <BR> ____________________________________________________ <BR> <BR> GNU/Linux <BR> Paul Emsley Nov 27 at 07:44 PM <BR> Ive never liked the movement calling GNU/Linux simply <BR> "Linux". sure, Linus Torvalds has written a fraction of the <BR> Linux kernel, but work began on the HURD a long time before <BR> Linus start and now the HURD has been up and running for years. <BR> Now, dont get me wrong, I have tons of <BR> respect for Linus Torvalds and crew. Any software I write <BR> that I can (ie I didnt right it under contract) and use gcc to <BR> compile it (if its in c). I use the Linux kernel every day and am <BR> quite grateful, but GNU is GNU and Torvalds should respect <BR> that and back off. <BR> If anyone asks me what OS I run, I will usually just say <BR> "Debian". If they ask what that is, I tell them that its a <BR> GNU/Linux distribution. The only reason I could think of to use <BR> the term Linux is if a distro ever apperars that *doesnt* use <BR> GNU (Mabey the fabeled Micro$oft disribution? :-P). Besides, <BR> trying to say (and this is the short version) <BR> "GNU/BSD/XFree86/Perl/Netscape/Linux" is a real pain and doesnt <BR> really help matters any - so lets just stick to GNU. <BR> [ Reply to this ] <BR> ____________________________________________________ <BR> <BR> Why care how it is called? <BR> Jochen Gruse Dec 16 at 04:26 AM <BR> Did anyone else out there discover any similarities in the comments <BR> leading up to here? <BR> Fraction A says "Fraction B should back down, *we* did the most <BR> important part. We have a lot of respect for B, but still." <BR> Now you can set A=GNU and B=Linux or vice versa, it doesn't matter <BR> which, and you have a boil-down version of a lot of comments here. <BR> Frankly, I believe that both groups are off target. Both groups <BR> benefitted equally from each other, GNU receiving a working kernel, <BR> making a stand alone GNU system possible, and Linux receiving critical <BR> development tools. <BR> So why should *anybody* care how the resulting OS is called? Call it <BR> GNU/Linux, if you think that the GNU part should be emphasized, or <BR> call it Linux, if that's what you think is right. But please, don't <BR> start any holy wars over a simple choice of words! After all, anyone <BR> using Linux will see the abundance of GNU tools, and anyone wanting to <BR> use a GNU system will probably end up with Linux (no, I didn't neglect <BR> *BSD or HURD, I said *probably*). <BR> Jochen Gruse <BR> [ Reply to this ] <BR> * You're right. Who cares? by Nathan matias on 2000-01-17 05:54:00 <BR> ____________________________________________________ <BR> <BR> Copyright of all documents belonging to this site by <BR> linuxpower.org and linuxpower.com C 1998-2000. <BR> For more legal information please look at our disclaimer page. <BR> <BR>====================End========================= <BR> <BR>-- <BR>|======================+========================+====================| <BR>| 以无法为有法 , | 拳本无法,有法也空; | 我爱GNU/Linux, | <BR>| 以无限为有限 | 一法不立,无法不容。| 因为我爱自由! | <BR>| | | | <BR>| 截拳道宗师-李小龙 | 意拳宗师-王芗斋 | 土人 Linuxrat | <BR>|======================+========================+====================| <BR> <BR>※ 来源:·BBS 水木清华站 smth.org·[FROM: 202.112.168.253] <BR><CENTER><H1>BBS水木清华站∶精华区</H1></CENTER></BODY></HTML>
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -