⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc1472.txt

📁 <VC++网络游戏建摸与实现>源代码
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 2 页
字号:
Network Working Group                                      F. KastenholzRequest for Comments: 1472                            FTP Software, Inc.                                                               June 1993                 The Definitions of Managed Objects for                       the Security Protocols of                      the Point-to-Point ProtocolStatus of this Memo   This RFC specifies an IAB standards track protocol for the Internet   community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.   Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol   Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol.   Distribution of this memo is unlimited.Abstract   This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)   for use with network management protocols in TCP/IP-based internets.   In particular, it describes managed objects used for managing the   Security Protocols on subnetwork interfaces using the family of   Point-to-Point Protocols [8, 9, 10, 11, & 12].Table of Contents   1. The Network Management Framework ......................    1   2. Objects ...............................................    2   2.1 Format of Definitions ................................    2   3. Overview ..............................................    2   3.1 Object Selection Criteria ............................    2   3.2 Structure of the PPP .................................    2   3.3 MIB Groups ...........................................    3   4. Definitions ...........................................    4   5. Acknowledgements ......................................    9   6. Security Considerations ...............................   10   7. References ............................................   11   8. Author's Address ......................................   121.  The Network Management Framework   The Internet-standard Network Management Framework consists of three   components.  They are:      STD 16/RFC 1155 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for      describing and naming objects for the purpose of management.  STD      16/RFC 1212 defines a more concise description mechanism, which isKastenholz                                                      [Page 1]RFC 1472                    PPP/Security MIB                   June 1993      wholly consistent with the SMI.      STD 17/RFC 1213 which defines MIB-II, the core set of managed      objects for the Internet suite of protocols.      STD 15/RFC 1157 which defines the SNMP, the protocol used for      network access to managed objects.   The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of   experimentation and evaluation.2.  Objects   Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed   the Management Information Base or MIB.  Objects in the MIB are   defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) [3]   defined in the SMI.  In particular, each object type is named by an   OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an administratively assigned name.  The object   type together with an object instance serves to uniquely identify a   specific instantiation of the object.  For human convenience, we   often use a textual string, termed the descriptor, to refer to the   object type.2.1.  Format of Definitions   Section 4 contains the specification of all object types contained in   this MIB module.  The object types are defined using the conventions   defined in the SMI, as amended by the extensions specified in [5,6].3.  Overview3.1.  Object Selection Criteria   To be consistent with IAB directives and good engineering practice,   an explicit attempt was made to keep this MIB as simple as possible.   This was accomplished by applying the following criteria to objects   proposed for inclusion:      (1)  Require objects be essential for either fault or           configuration management.  In particular, objects for           which the sole purpose was to debug implementations were           explicitly excluded from the MIB.      (2)  Consider evidence of current use and/or utility.      (3)  Limit the total number of objects.      (4)  Exclude objects which are simply derivable from others inKastenholz                                                      [Page 2]RFC 1472                    PPP/Security MIB                   June 1993           this or other MIBs.3.2.  Structure of the PPP   This section describes the basic model of PPP used in developing the   PPP MIB. This information should be useful to the implementor in   understanding some of the basic design decisions of the MIB.   The PPP is not one single protocol but a large family of protocols.   Each of these is, in itself, a fairly complex protocol.  The PPP   protocols may be divided into three rough categories:   Control Protocols      The Control Protocols are used to control the operation of the      PPP. The Control Protocols include the Link Control Protocol      (LCP), the Password Authentication Protocol (PAP), the Link      Quality Report (LQR), and the Challenge Handshake Authentication      Protocol (CHAP).   Network Protocols      The Network Protocols are used to move the network traffic over      the PPP interface.  A Network Protocol encapsulates the datagrams      of a specific higher-layer protocol that is using the PPP as a      data link.  Note that within the context of PPP, the term "Network      Protocol" does not imply an OSI Layer-3 protocol; for instance,      there is a Bridging network protocol.   Network Control Protocols (NCPs)      The NCPs are used to control the operation of the Network      Protocols. Generally, each Network Protocol has its own Network      Control Protocol; thus, the IP Network Protocol has its IP Control      Protocol, the Bridging Network Protocol has its Bridging Network      Control Protocol and so on.   This document specifies the objects used in managing one of these   protocols, namely the PPP Authentication Protocols.3.3.  MIB Groups   Objects in this MIB are arranged into several MIB groups.  Each group   is organized as a set of related objects.   These groups are the basic unit of conformance: if the semantics of a   group are applicable to an implementation then all objects in the   group must be implemented.   The PPP MIB is organized into several MIB Groups, including, but not   limited to, the following groups:Kastenholz                                                      [Page 3]RFC 1472                    PPP/Security MIB                   June 1993          o The PPP Link Group          o The PPP LQR Group          o The PPP LQR Extensions Group          o The PPP IP Group          o The PPP Bridge Group          o The PPP Security Group   This document specifies the following group:   PPP Security Group      The PPP Security Group contains all configuration and control      variables that apply to PPP security.      Implementation of this group is optional.  Implementation is      optional since the variables in this group provide configuration      and control for the PPP Security functions.  Thus, these variables      should be protected by SNMPv2 security.  If an agent does not      support SNMPv2 with privacy it is strongly advised that this group      not be implemented.  See the section on "Security Considerations"      at the end of this document.4.  Definitions          PPP-SEC-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN          IMPORTS               Counter                    FROM RFC1155-SMI               OBJECT-TYPE                    FROM RFC-1212               ppp                    FROM PPP-LCP-MIB;               pppSecurity OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { ppp 2 }               pppSecurityProtocols OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pppSecurity 1 }          -- The following uniquely identify the various protocols          -- used by PPP security. These OBJECT IDENTIFIERS are          -- used in the pppSecurityConfigProtocol and          -- pppSecuritySecretsProtocol objects to identify to which          -- protocols the table entries apply.               pppSecurityPapProtocol OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=                         { pppSecurityProtocols 1 }               pppSecurityChapMD5Protocol OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=                         { pppSecurityProtocols 2 }Kastenholz                                                      [Page 4]RFC 1472                    PPP/Security MIB                   June 1993          -- PPP Security Group          -- Implementation of this group is optional.          -- This table allows the network manager to configure          -- which security protocols are to be used on which          -- link and in what order of preference each is to be tried          pppSecurityConfigTable   OBJECT-TYPE               SYNTAX    SEQUENCE OF PppSecurityConfigEntry               ACCESS    not-accessible               STATUS    mandatory               DESCRIPTION                         "Table containing the configuration and                         preference parameters for PPP Security."               ::= { pppSecurity 2 }          pppSecurityConfigEntry   OBJECT-TYPE               SYNTAX    PppSecurityConfigEntry               ACCESS    not-accessible               STATUS    mandatory               DESCRIPTION                         "Security configuration information for a                         particular PPP link."               INDEX     { pppSecurityConfigLink,                         pppSecurityConfigPreference }               ::= { pppSecurityConfigTable 1 }          PppSecurityConfigEntry ::= SEQUENCE {               pppSecurityConfigLink                    INTEGER,               pppSecurityConfigPreference                    INTEGER,               pppSecurityConfigProtocol                    OBJECT IDENTIFIER,               pppSecurityConfigStatus                    INTEGER               }          pppSecurityConfigLink   OBJECT-TYPE               SYNTAX    INTEGER(0..2147483647)               ACCESS    read-write               STATUS    mandatory               DESCRIPTION                         "The value of ifIndex that identifies the entryKastenholz                                                      [Page 5]RFC 1472                    PPP/Security MIB                   June 1993                         in the interface table that is associated with                         the local PPP entity's link for which this                         particular security algorithm shall be                         attempted. A value of 0 indicates the default                         algorithm - i.e., this entry applies to all                         links for which explicit entries in the table                         do not exist."               ::= { pppSecurityConfigEntry 1 }          pppSecurityConfigPreference   OBJECT-TYPE               SYNTAX    INTEGER(0..2147483647)               ACCESS    read-write               STATUS    mandatory               DESCRIPTION                         "The relative preference of the security                         protocol identified by                         pppSecurityConfigProtocol. Security protocols                         with lower values of                         pppSecurityConfigPreference are tried before                         protocols with higher values of                         pppSecurityConfigPreference."               ::= { pppSecurityConfigEntry 2 }          pppSecurityConfigProtocol   OBJECT-TYPE               SYNTAX    OBJECT IDENTIFIER               ACCESS    read-write               STATUS    mandatory               DESCRIPTION                         "Identifies the security protocol to be                         attempted on the link identified by                         pppSecurityConfigLink at the preference level                         identified by pppSecurityConfigPreference. "               ::= { pppSecurityConfigEntry 3 }          pppSecurityConfigStatus   OBJECT-TYPE               SYNTAX    INTEGER  {                         invalid(1),                         valid(2)                    }               ACCESS    read-write               STATUS    mandatory               DESCRIPTION                         "Setting this object to the value invalid(1)                         has the effect of invalidating the                         corresponding entry in theKastenholz                                                      [Page 6]RFC 1472                    PPP/Security MIB                   June 1993                         pppSecurityConfigTable. It is an                         implementation-specific matter as to whether                         the agent removes an invalidated entry from the                         table.  Accordingly, management stations must                         be prepared to receive tabular information from                         agents that corresponds to entries not                         currently in use.  Proper interpretation of                         such entries requires examination of the                         relevant pppSecurityConfigStatus object."               DEFVAL    { valid }               ::= { pppSecurityConfigEntry 4 }          -- This table contains all of the ID/Secret pair information.          pppSecuritySecretsTable   OBJECT-TYPE               SYNTAX    SEQUENCE OF PppSecuritySecretsEntry               ACCESS    not-accessible               STATUS    mandatory               DESCRIPTION                         "Table containing the identities and secrets                         used by the PPP authentication protocols.  As                         this table contains secret information, it is

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -