📄 rfc1780.txt
字号:
A protocol may enter the standards track only on the recommendation of the IESG; and may move from one state to another along the track only on the recommendation of the IESG. That is, it takes action by the IESG to either start a protocol on the track or to move it along. Generally, as the protocol enters the standards track a decision is made as to the eventual STATUS, requirement level or applicability (elective, recommended, or required) the protocol will have, although a somewhat less stringent current status may be assigned, and it then is placed in the the proposed standard STATE with that status. So the initial placement of a protocol is into state 1. At any time the STATUS decision may be revisited.Internet Architecture Board [Page 12]RFC 1780 Internet Standards March 1995 | +<----------------------------------------------+ | ^ V 0 | 4 +-----------+ +===========+ | enter |-->----------------+-------------->|experiment | +-----------+ | +=====+=====+ | | V 1 | +-----------+ V | proposed |-------------->+ +--->+-----+-----+ | | | | | V 2 | +<---+-----+-----+ V | draft std |-------------->+ +--->+-----+-----+ | | | | | V 3 | +<---+=====+=====+ V | standard |-------------->+ +=====+=====+ | | V 5 +=====+=====+ | historic | +===========+ The transition from proposed standard (1) to draft standard (2) can only be by action of the IESG and only after the protocol has been proposed standard (1) for at least six months. The transition from draft standard (2) to standard (3) can only be by action of the IESG and only after the protocol has been draft standard (2) for at least four months. Occasionally, the decision may be that the protocol is not ready for standardization and will be assigned to the experimental state (4). This is off the standards track, and the protocol may be resubmitted to enter the standards track after further work. There are other paths into the experimental and historic states that do not involve IESG action. Sometimes one protocol is replaced by another and thus becomes historic, or it may happen that a protocol on the standards track is in a sense overtaken by another protocol (or other events) and becomes historic (state 5).Internet Architecture Board [Page 13]RFC 1780 Internet Standards March 19956. The Protocols Subsection 6.1 lists recent RFCs and other changes. Subsections 6.2 - 6.10 list the standards in groups by protocol state.6.1. Recent Changes6.1.1. New RFCs: 1786 - Representation of IP Routing Policies in a Routing Registry (ripe-81++) This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1785 - TFTP Option Negotiation Analysis This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1784 - TFTP Timeout Interval and Transfer Size Options A Proposed Standard protocol. 1783 - TFTP Blocksize Option A Proposed Standard protocol. 1782 - TFTP Option Extension A Proposed Standard protocol. 1781 - Using the OSI Directory to Achieve User Friendly Naming A Proposed Standard protocol. 1780 - Internet Official Protocol Standards This memo. 1779 - A String Representation of Distinguished Names A Draft Standard protocol. 1778 - The String Representation of Standard Attribute Syntaxes A Draft Standard protocol.Internet Architecture Board [Page 14]RFC 1780 Internet Standards March 1995 1777 - Lightweight Directory Access Protocol A Draft Standard protocol. 1776 - Not yet issued. 1775 - To Be "On" the Internet This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1774 - BGP-4 Protocol Analysis This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1773 - Experience with the BGP-4 protocol This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1772 - Application of the Border Gateway Protocol in the Internet A Draft Standard protocol. 1771 - A Border Gateway Protocol 4 (BGP-4) A Draft Standard protocol. 1770 - IPv4 Option for Sender Directed Multi-Destination Delivery This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1769 - Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP) This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1768 - Host Group Extensions for CLNP Multicasting An Experimental protocol. 1767 - MIME Encapsulation of EDI Objects A Proposed Standard protocol.Internet Architecture Board [Page 15]RFC 1780 Internet Standards March 1995 1766 - Tags for the Identification of Languages A Proposed Standard protocol. 1765 - OSPF Database Overflow An Experimental protocol. 1764 - The PPP XNS IDP Control Protocol (XNSCP) A Proposed Standard protocol. 1763 - The PPP Banyan Vines Control Protocol (BVCP) A Proposed Standard protocol. 1762 - The PPP DECnet Phase IV Control Protocol (DNCP) A Draft Standard protocol. 1761 - Snoop Version 2 Packet Capture File Format This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1760 - The S/KEY One-Time Password System This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1759 - Printer MIB A Proposed Standard protocol. 1758 - NADF Standing Documents: A Brief Overview This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1757 - Remote Network Monitoring Management Information Base A Draft Standard protocol. 1756 - Remote Write ProtocolL - Version 1.0 An Experimental protocol.Internet Architecture Board [Page 16]RFC 1780 Internet Standards March 1995 1755 - ATM Signaling Support for IP over ATM A Proposed Standard protocol. 1754 - IP over ATM Working Group's Recommendations for the ATM Forum's Multiprotocol This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1753 - IPng Technical Requirements Of the Nimrod Routing and Addressing Architecture This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1752 - The Recommendation for the IP Next Generation Protocol A Proposed Standard protocol. 1751 - A Convention for Human-Readable 128-bit Keys This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1750 - Randomness Recommendations for Security This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard. 1749 - IEEE 802.5 Station Source Routing MIB using SMIv2 A Proposed Standard protocol. 1748 - IEEE 802.5 MIB using SMIv2 A Draft Standard protocol. 1747 - Definitions of Managed Objects for SNA Data Link Control (SDLC) using SMIv2 A Proposed Standard protocol. 1746 - Ways to Define User Expectations This is an information document and does not specify any level of standard.Internet Architecture Board [Page 17]RFC 1780 Internet Standards March 1995 1745 - BGP4/IDRP for IP---OSPF Interaction A Proposed Standard protocol. 1744 - Observations on the Management of the Internet Address Space This is an information document and does not specify any
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -