rfc1880.txt

<VC++网络游戏建摸与实现>源代码

Internet Architecture Board Standards Track                    [Page 11]

RFC 1880                   Internet Standards              November 1995


      (3) Refer to an Area Director for review by a WG.  Expect to see
          the document again only after approval by the IESG.

      (4) Notify both the IESG and IRSG.  If no concerns are raised in
          two weeks then do Discretion (5), else RFC Editor to resolve
          the concerns or do Refer (3).

      (5) RFC Editor's discretion.  The RFC Editor decides if a review
          is needed and if so by whom.  RFC Editor decides to publish or
          not.

   Of course, in all cases the RFC Editor can request or make minor
   changes for style, format, and presentation purposes.

   The IESG has designated the IESG Secretary as its agent for
   forwarding documents with IESG approval and for registering concerns
   in response to notifications (4) to the RFC Editor.  Documents from
   Area Directors or Working Group Chairs may be considered in the same
   way as documents from "other".

5.2.  The Standards Track Diagram

   There is a part of the STATUS and STATE categorization that is called
   the standards track.  Actually, only the changes of state are
   significant to the progression along the standards track, though the
   status assignments may change as well.

   The states illustrated by single line boxes are temporary states,
   those illustrated by double line boxes are long term states.  A
   protocol will normally be expected to remain in a temporary state for
   several months (minimum six months for proposed standard, minimum
   four months for draft standard).  A protocol may be in a long term
   state for many years.

   A protocol may enter the standards track only on the recommendation
   of the IESG; and may move from one state to another along the track
   only on the recommendation of the IESG.  That is, it takes action by
   the IESG to either start a protocol on the track or to move it along.

   Generally, as the protocol enters the standards track a decision is
   made as to the eventual STATUS, requirement level or applicability
   (elective, recommended, or required) the protocol will have, although
   a somewhat less stringent current status may be assigned, and it then
   is placed in the the proposed standard STATE with that status.  So
   the initial placement of a protocol is into state 1.  At any time the
   STATUS decision may be revisited.





Internet Architecture Board Standards Track                    [Page 12]

RFC 1880                   Internet Standards              November 1995


         |
         +<----------------------------------------------+
         |                                               ^
         V    0                                          |    4
   +-----------+                                   +===========+
   |   enter   |-->----------------+-------------->|experiment |
   +-----------+                   |               +=====+=====+
                                   |                     |
                                   V    1                |
                             +-----------+               V
                             | proposed  |-------------->+
                        +--->+-----+-----+               |
                        |          |                     |
                        |          V    2                |
                        +<---+-----+-----+               V
                             | draft std |-------------->+
                        +--->+-----+-----+               |
                        |          |                     |
                        |          V    3                |
                        +<---+=====+=====+               V
                             | standard  |-------------->+
                             +=====+=====+               |
                                                         |
                                                         V    5
                                                   +=====+=====+
                                                   | historic  |
                                                   +===========+

   The transition from proposed standard (1) to draft standard (2) can
   only be by action of the IESG and only after the protocol has been
   proposed standard (1) for at least six months.

   The transition from draft standard (2) to standard (3) can only be by
   action of the IESG and only after the protocol has been draft
   standard (2) for at least four months.

   Occasionally, the decision may be that the protocol is not ready for
   standardization and will be assigned to the experimental state (4).
   This is off the standards track, and the protocol may be resubmitted
   to enter the standards track after further work.  There are other
   paths into the experimental and historic states that do not involve
   IESG action.

   Sometimes one protocol is replaced by another and thus becomes
   historic, or it may happen that a protocol on the standards track is
   in a sense overtaken by another protocol (or other events) and
   becomes historic (state 5).




Internet Architecture Board Standards Track                    [Page 13]

RFC 1880                   Internet Standards              November 1995


6.  The Protocols

   Subsection 6.1 lists recent RFCs and other changes.  Subsections 6.2
   - 6.10 list the standards in groups by protocol state.

6.1.  Recent Changes

6.1.1.  New RFCs:

      1880 - Internet Official Protocol Standards

             This memo.

      1871 - Addendum to RFC 1602 -- Variance Procedure

             This is a Best Current Practices document and does not
             specify any level of standard.

      1870 - SMTP Service Extension for Message Size Declaration

             A Standard protocol.

      1869 - SMTP Service Extensions

             A Standard protocol.

      1868 - ARP Extension - UNARP

             An Experimental protocol.

      1867 - Form-based File Upload in HTML

             An Experimental protocol.

      1866 - Hypertext Markup Language - 2.0

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1865 - not yet issued.

      1864 - The Content-MD5 Header Field

             A Draft Standard protocol.

      1863 - A BGP/IDRP Route Server alternative to a full mesh routing

             An Experimental protocol.




Internet Architecture Board Standards Track                    [Page 14]

RFC 1880                   Internet Standards              November 1995


      1862 - Report of the IAB Workshop on Internet Information
             Infrastructure, October 12-14, 1994

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1861 - Simple Network Paging Protocol - Version 3 - Two-Way
             Enhanced

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1860 - Variable Length Subnet Table For IPv4

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1859 - ISO Transport Class 2 Non-use of Explicit Flow Control over
             TCP RFC1006 extension

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1858 - Security Considerations for IP Fragment Filtering

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1857 - A Model for Common Operational Statistics

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1856 - The Opstat Client-Server Model for Statistics Retrieval

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1855 - Netiquette Guidelines

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1854 - SMTP Service Extension for Command Pipelining

             A Proposed Standard protocol.





Internet Architecture Board Standards Track                    [Page 15]

RFC 1880                   Internet Standards              November 1995


      1853 - IP in IP Tunneling

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1852 - IP Authentication using Keyed SHA

             An Experimental protocol.

      1851 - The ESP Triple DES Transform

             An Experimental protocol.

      1850 - OSPF Version 2 Management Information Base

             A Draft Standard protocol.

      1849 - not yet issued.

      1848 - MIME Object Security Services

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1847 - Security Multiparts for MIME: Multipart/Signed and
             Multipart/Encrypted

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1846 - SMTP 521 Reply Code

             An Experimental protocol.

      1845 - SMTP Service Extension for Checkpoint/Restart

             An Experimental protocol.

      1844 - Multimedia E-mail (MIME) User Agent Checklist

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1843 - ASCII Printable Characters-Based Chinese Character Encoding
             for Internet Messages

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.





Internet Architecture Board Standards Track                    [Page 16]

RFC 1880                   Internet Standards              November 1995


      1842 - ASCII Printable Characters-Based Chinese Character Encoding
             for Internet Messages

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1841 - PPP Network Control Protocol for LAN Extension

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1840 - not yet issued.

      1839 - not yet issued.

      1838 - Use of the X.500 Directory to support mapping between X.400
             and RFC 822 Addresses

             An Experimental protocol.

      1837 - Representing Tables and Subtrees in the X.500 Directory