⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc1685.txt

📁 <VC++网络游戏建摸与实现>源代码
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 2 页
字号:
    Physical Delivery Country Name         PD-country        PD-C    Table F.3. Other Attributes    X.121 Network Address                  X.121             X.121    E.163/E.164 Network Address            ISDN              ISDN    PSAP Network Address                   PSAP              PSAP    User Agent Numeric ID                  N-ID              N-ID    Terminal Identifier                    T-ID              T-ID    Terminal Type                          T-TY              T-TY    Domain Defined Attribute               DDA:<type>    DDA:<type>    where the notation <type> identifies the type of domain defined    attribute.   F.3.2.2 Terminal Type      There are currently six terminal types, and if international      consistency is required the following specific abbreviations      should be used to represent the values for these types: tlx, ttx,      g3fax, g4fax, ia5 and vtx.RARE Working Group on Mail and Messaging (WG-MSG)               [Page 6]RFC 1685                Writing X.400 O/R Names              August 1994   F.3.2.3 Domain Defined Attribute      The label for a DDA consists of "DDA:" followed by the DDA type.      If an address includes more than one DDA of the same type, it is      assumed that the DDAs are intended to be processed in the sequence      in which they are represented.      EXAMPLE - DDA:RFC-822=fred(a)widget.co.uk; O=gateway; P=abc; C=gb      If the <type> of a DDA type includes the character "=", it is      represented by "==".   F.3.3 Self-explanatory format      The self-explanatory format may be used when space is available.      It consists of a list of the attribute types, either in full or      abbreviated. The attribute types or abbreviations may be in any      language, but each attribute type or abbreviation in Table F.1 is      followed by the specified label. If English language abbreviations      are used, they should be those given in Tables F.1, F.2 and F.3.      If an address is entirely composed of attributes contained in      Table F.1, it is recommended that the sequence of attributes in      the address is that given in Table F.1. If this sequence is      incompatible with normal cultural conventions, an alternative      sequence may be adopted for representations of addresses which are      primarily intended for use within that culture.    EXAMPLE 1 - Using attribute types in the Norwegian language    Fornavn (G)                            Per    Etternavn (S)                          Hansen    Organisasjon (O)                       Teledir    Organisasjonsenhet (OU1)               Forskning    Privat domene (P)                      Tele    Administrasjonsdomene (A)              Telemax    Land (C)                               NORARE Working Group on Mail and Messaging (WG-MSG)               [Page 7]RFC 1685                Writing X.400 O/R Names              August 1994    EXAMPLE 2 - Using attribute types and abbreviations in the English                language    Given name (G)                         John    Surname (S)                            Smith    Organization (O)                       A Bank Ltd    Org. Unit (OU1)                        IT Dept    Org. Unit (OU2)                        MSG Group    PRMD (P)                               ABL    ADMD (A)                               Snomail    Country (C)                            AQ   F.4 User interface      This clause specifies the characteristics of a user interface      which are necessary to enable a user to input O/R addresses      represented in either of the formats specified in clause F.3.      It is necessary for the user interface to be able to accept any      valid combination of attributes from Tables F.1, F.2 and F.3.      If the user interface lists the attributes given in Table F.1, it      is recommended that either the sequence used in Table F.1 should      be used, or if this sequence is incompatible with normal cultural      conventions, the alternative sequence adopted within a particular      culture.      If the user supplies a value for the PRMD attribute but omits the      ADMD attribute, or omits the value for the ADMD attribute, the      ADMD value to be used is a single space.      Where an interface accepts an O/R address as a single string      (e.g., in a command line interface), it is necessary to accept any      valid labelled format address allowing the user to enter either      delimiter. The interface should not require the attributes to be      specified in any particular order. The interface should accept      labels in upper or lower case.      NOTE - For some existing command line interfaces it may be      necessary to enclose the whole labelled format address in quotes.      If any other type of interface is provided (e.g., a prompting or      form-fill interface), it is necessary to provide a means which      enables the user to easily associate the identity of each      attribute with the labels specified in Tables F.1, F.2 and F.3.RARE Working Group on Mail and Messaging (WG-MSG)               [Page 8]RFC 1685                Writing X.400 O/R Names              August 1994   NOTES      1.   One way to associate the identity of each attribute with the           labels is to follow the attribute type (or abbreviation) for           each attribute with the label in brackets, for example:           Given name (G)           Initials (I)           Surname (S)           Generation Qualifier (Q)           Common Name (CN)           Organization (O)           Organizational Unit 1 (OU1)           Organizational Unit 2 (OU2)           Organizational Unit 3 (OU3)           Organizational Unit 4 (OU4)           Private Management Domain Name (P)           Administration Management Domain Name (A)           Country (C)      2.   Many users may have difficulty copying an address presented           as a table (either in labelled or self-explanatory format)           into a command line interface which uses delimiters.      3.   For form-fill style interfaces, user performance will be           optimised when the interface most closely resembles the           format of the supplied address with the same sequence of           attributes using the same attribute types or labels.    Examples of application      1.   The Norwegian user of a command line interface receives a           business card containing the following O/R address:           G=john; S=smith; O=a bank ltd; P=abl; A=snomail; C=aq           The command line interface enables the user to type in the           address exactly as presented on the card.      2.   The Norwegian user of a form fill interface receives the           same business card. The form on the screen includes the           following field names:RARE Working Group on Mail and Messaging (WG-MSG)               [Page 9]RFC 1685                Writing X.400 O/R Names              August 1994           Fornavn (G)           Etternavn (S)           Organisasjon (O)           Privat domene (P)           Administrasjonsdomene (A)           Land (C)           The user is able to fill in the form by associating the           single letter labels on the business card with the same           labels in brackets after the Norwegian names of the           attributes on the screen. (For form fill input the           delimiters are not used.)      3.   The English speaking user of a command line interface           receives a document quoting the following O/R address:           Fornavn (G)               Per           Etternavn (S)             Hansen           Organisasjon (O)          Teledir           Organisasjonsenhet (OU1)  Forskning           Privat domene (P)         Tele           Administrasjonsdomene (A) Telemax           Land (C)                  NO           The user knows how to transform the address from self-           explanatory to labelled format. The user can choose to enter           the address with either delimiter, e.g.,:          g=per;s=hansen;o=teledir;ou1=forskning;p=tele;a=telemax;c=no           or:         /g=per/s=hansen/o=teledir/ou1=forskning/p=tele/a=telemax/c=no4. References   [1]  F.401 - CCITT Message Handling Services - Operations        and Definitions of Service - Naming and Addressing        for Public Message Handling Services, Annex B        (08/92).        Available (at the time of writing) as the GOPHER URL:        gopher://info.itu.ch/9/.1/ITUdoc/.dirtree/.1/.itu-        t/.rec/.f/.23068/.7724.zipRARE Working Group on Mail and Messaging (WG-MSG)              [Page 10]RFC 1685                Writing X.400 O/R Names              August 19945. Security Considerations   Security issues are not discussed in this memo.6. Author's Address   Harald Tveit Alvestrand   UNINETT A/S   P.O.Box 6883   ELGESETER   N-7002 TRONDHEIM   NORWAY   RFC822: Harald.Alvestrand@uninett.no   X.400:  C=no; ADMD=; PRMD=uninett; O=uninett; S=alvestrand;   G=haraldRARE Working Group on Mail and Messaging (WG-MSG)              [Page 11]

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -