⭐ 欢迎来到虫虫下载站! | 📦 资源下载 📁 资源专辑 ℹ️ 关于我们
⭐ 虫虫下载站

📄 rfc822.txt

📁 RFC 相关的技术文档
💻 TXT
📖 第 1 页 / 共 5 页
字号:
        This field provides a general  mechanism  for  indicating  any        mailbox(es)  to which responses are to be sent.  Three typical        uses for this feature can  be  distinguished.   In  the  first        case,  the  author(s) may not have regular machine-based mail-        boxes and therefore wish(es) to indicate an alternate  machine        address.   In  the  second case, an author may wish additional        persons to be made aware of, or responsible for,  replies.   A        somewhat  different  use  may be of some help to "text message        teleconferencing" groups equipped with automatic  distribution        services:   include the address of that service in the "Reply-        To" field of all messages  submitted  to  the  teleconference;        then  participants  can  "reply"  to conference submissions to        guarantee the correct distribution of any submission of  their        own.        Note:  The "Return-Path" field is added by the mail  transport               service,  at the time of final deliver.  It is intended               to identify a path back to the orginator  of  the  mes-               sage.   The  "Reply-To"  field  is added by the message               originator and is intended to direct replies.     4.4.4.  AUTOMATIC USE OF FROM / SENDER / REPLY-TO        For systems which automatically  generate  address  lists  for        replies to messages, the following recommendations are made:            o   The "Sender" field mailbox should be sent  notices  of                any  problems in transport or delivery of the original                messages.  If there is no  "Sender"  field,  then  the                "From" field mailbox should be used.            o   The  "Sender"  field  mailbox  should  NEVER  be  used                automatically, in a recipient's reply message.            o   If the "Reply-To" field exists, then the reply  should                go to the addresses indicated in that field and not to                the address(es) indicated in the "From" field.     August 13, 1982              - 22 -                      RFC #822      Standard for ARPA Internet Text Messages            o   If there is a "From" field, but no  "Reply-To"  field,                the  reply should be sent to the address(es) indicated                in the "From" field.        Sometimes, a recipient may actually wish to  communicate  with        the  person  that  initiated  the  message  transfer.  In such        cases, it is reasonable to use the "Sender" address.        This recommendation is intended  only  for  automated  use  of        originator-fields  and is not intended to suggest that replies        may not also be sent to other recipients of messages.   It  is        up  to  the  respective  mail-handling programs to decide what        additional facilities will be provided.        Examples are provided in Appendix A.     4.5.  RECEIVER FIELDS     4.5.1.  TO / RESENT-TO        This field contains the identity of the primary recipients  of        the message.     4.5.2.  CC / RESENT-CC        This field contains the identity of  the  secondary  (informa-        tional) recipients of the message.     4.5.3.  BCC / RESENT-BCC        This field contains the identity of additional  recipients  of        the  message.   The contents of this field are not included in        copies of the message sent to the primary and secondary  reci-        pients.   Some  systems  may choose to include the text of the        "Bcc" field only in the author(s)'s  copy,  while  others  may        also include it in the text sent to all those indicated in the        "Bcc" list.     4.6.  REFERENCE FIELDS     4.6.1.  MESSAGE-ID / RESENT-MESSAGE-ID             This field contains a unique identifier  (the  local-part        address  unit)  which  refers to THIS version of THIS message.        The uniqueness of the message identifier is guaranteed by  the        host  which  generates  it.  This identifier is intended to be        machine readable and not necessarily meaningful to humans.   A        message  identifier pertains to exactly one instantiation of a        particular message; subsequent revisions to the message should     August 13, 1982              - 23 -                      RFC #822      Standard for ARPA Internet Text Messages        each receive new message identifiers.     4.6.2.  IN-REPLY-TO             The contents of this field identify  previous  correspon-        dence  which this message answers.  Note that if message iden-        tifiers are used in this  field,  they  must  use  the  msg-id        specification format.     4.6.3.  REFERENCES             The contents of this field identify other  correspondence        which  this message references.  Note that if message identif-        iers are used, they must use the msg-id specification format.     4.6.4.  KEYWORDS             This field contains keywords  or  phrases,  separated  by        commas.     4.7.  OTHER FIELDS     4.7.1.  SUBJECT             This is intended to provide a summary,  or  indicate  the        nature, of the message.     4.7.2.  COMMENTS             Permits adding text comments  onto  the  message  without        disturbing the contents of the message's body.     4.7.3.  ENCRYPTED             Sometimes,  data  encryption  is  used  to  increase  the        privacy  of  message  contents.   If the body of a message has        been encrypted, to keep its contents private, the  "Encrypted"        field  can be used to note the fact and to indicate the nature        of the encryption.  The first <word> parameter  indicates  the        software  used  to  encrypt the body, and the second, optional        <word> is intended to  aid  the  recipient  in  selecting  the        proper  decryption  key.   This  code word may be viewed as an        index to a table of keys held by the recipient.        Note:  Unfortunately, headers must contain envelope,  as  well               as  contents,  information.  Consequently, it is neces-               sary that they remain unencrypted, so that  mail  tran-               sport   services   may   access   them.   Since  names,               addresses, and "Subject"  field  contents  may  contain     August 13, 1982              - 24 -                      RFC #822      Standard for ARPA Internet Text Messages               sensitive  information,  this  requirement limits total               message privacy.             Names of encryption software are registered with the Net-        work  Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, Cali-        fornia.     4.7.4.  EXTENSION-FIELD             A limited number of common fields have  been  defined  in        this  document.   As  network mail requirements dictate, addi-        tional fields may be standardized.   To  provide  user-defined        fields  with  a  measure  of  safety,  in name selection, such        extension-fields will never have names  that  begin  with  the        string "X-".             Names of Extension-fields are registered with the Network        Information Center, SRI International, Menlo Park, California.     4.7.5.  USER-DEFINED-FIELD             Individual users of network mail are free to  define  and        use  additional  header  fields.   Such fields must have names        which are not already used in the current specification or  in        any definitions of extension-fields, and the overall syntax of        these user-defined-fields must conform to this specification's        rules   for   delimiting  and  folding  fields.   Due  to  the        extension-field  publishing  process,  the  name  of  a  user-        defined-field may be pre-empted        Note:  The prefatory string "X-" will never  be  used  in  the               names  of Extension-fields.  This provides user-defined               fields with a protected set of names.     August 13, 1982              - 25 -                      RFC #822      Standard for ARPA Internet Text Messages     5.  DATE AND TIME SPECIFICATION     5.1.  SYNTAX     date-time   =  [ day "," ] date time        ; dd mm yy                                                 ;  hh:mm:ss zzz     day         =  "Mon"  / "Tue" /  "Wed"  / "Thu"                 /  "Fri"  / "Sat" /  "Sun"     date        =  1*2DIGIT month 2DIGIT        ; day month year                                                 ;  e.g. 20 Jun 82     month       =  "Jan"  /  "Feb" /  "Mar"  /  "Apr"                 /  "May"  /  "Jun" /  "Jul"  /  "Aug"                 /  "Sep"  /  "Oct" /  "Nov"  /  "Dec"     time        =  hour zone                    ; ANSI and Military     hour        =  2DIGIT ":" 2DIGIT [":" 2DIGIT]                                                 ; 00:00:00 - 23:59:59     zone        =  "UT"  / "GMT"                ; Universal Time                                                 ; North American : UT                 /  "EST" / "EDT"                ;  Eastern:  - 5/ - 4                 /  "CST" / "CDT"                ;  Central:  - 6/ - 5                 /  "MST" / "MDT"                ;  Mountain: - 7/ - 6                 /  "PST" / "PDT"                ;  Pacific:  - 8/ - 7                 /  1ALPHA                       ; Military: Z = UT;                                                 ;  A:-1; (J not used)                                                 ;  M:-12; N:+1; Y:+12                 / ( ("+" / "-") 4DIGIT )        ; Local differential                                                 ;  hours+min. (HHMM)     5.2.  SEMANTICS          If included, day-of-week must be the day implied by the date     specification.          Time zone may be indicated in several ways.  "UT" is Univer-     sal  Time  (formerly called "Greenwich Mean Time"); "GMT" is per-     mitted as a reference to Universal Time.  The  military  standard     uses  a  single  character for each zone.  "Z" is Universal Time.     "A" indicates one hour earlier, and "M" indicates 12  hours  ear-     lier;  "N"  is  one  hour  later, and "Y" is 12 hours later.  The     letter "J" is not used.  The other remaining two forms are  taken     from ANSI standard X3.51-1975.  One allows explicit indication of     the amount of offset from UT; the other uses  common  3-character     strings for indicating time zones in North America.     August 13, 1982              - 26 -                      RFC #822      Standard for ARPA Internet Text Messages     6.  ADDRESS SPECIFICATION     6.1.  SYNTAX     address     =  mailbox                      ; one addressee                 /  group                        ; named list     group       =  phrase ":" [#mailbox] ";"     mailbox     =  addr-spec                    ; simple address                 /  phrase route-addr            ; name & addr-spec     route-addr  =  "<" [route] addr-spec ">"     route       =  1#("@" domain) ":"           ; path-relative     addr-spec   =  local-part "@" domain        ; global address     local-part  =  word *("." word)             ; uninterpreted                                                 ; case-preserved     domain      =  sub-domain *("." sub-domain)     sub-domain  =  domain-ref / domain-literal     domain-ref  =  atom                         ; symbolic reference     6.2.  SEMANTICS          A mailbox receives mail.  It is a  conceptual  entity  which     does  not necessarily pertain to file storage.  For example, some     sites may choose to print mail on their line printer and  deliver     the output to the addressee's desk.          A mailbox specification comprises a person, system  or  pro-     cess name reference, a domain-dependent string, and a name-domain     reference.  The name reference is optional and is usually used to     indicate  the  human name of a recipient.  The name-domain refer-     ence specifies a sequence of sub-domains.   The  domain-dependent     string is uninterpreted, except by the final sub-domain; the rest     of the mail service merely transmits it as a literal string.     6.2.1.  DOMAINS        A name-domain is a set of registered (mail)  names.   A  name-        domain  specification  resolves  to  a subordinate name-domain        specification  or  to  a  terminal  domain-dependent   string.        Hence,  domain  specification  is  extensible,  permitting any        number of registration levels.     August 13, 1982              - 27 -                      RFC #822      Standard for ARPA Internet Text Messages        Name-domains model a global, logical, hierarchical  addressing        scheme.   The  model is logical, in that an address specifica-        tion is related to name registration and  is  not  necessarily        tied  to  transmission  path.   The  model's  hierarchy  is  a        directed graph, called an in-tree, such that there is a single        path  from  the root of the tree to any node in the hierarchy.        If more than one path actually exists, they are considered  to        be different addresses.        The root node is common to all addresses; consequently, i

⌨️ 快捷键说明

复制代码 Ctrl + C
搜索代码 Ctrl + F
全屏模式 F11
切换主题 Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键 ?
增大字号 Ctrl + =
减小字号 Ctrl + -