rfc1332.txt
来自「RFC 的详细文档!」· 文本 代码 · 共 788 行 · 第 1/2 页
TXT
788 行
Network Working Group G. McGregor
Request for Comments: 1332 Merit
Obsoletes: RFC 1172 May 1992
The PPP Internet Protocol Control Protocol (IPCP)
Status of this Memo
This RFC specifies an IAB standards track protocol for the Internet
community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Please refer to the current edition of the "IAB Official Protocol
Standards" for the standardization state and status of this protocol.
Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method of
encapsulating Network Layer protocol information over point-to-point
links. PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and
proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for
establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols.
This document defines the NCP for establishing and configuring the
Internet Protocol [2] over PPP, and a method to negotiate and use Van
Jacobson TCP/IP header compression [3] with PPP.
This RFC is a product of the Point-to-Point Protocol Working Group of
the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF).
McGregor [Page i]
RFC 1332 PPP IPCP May 1992
Table of Contents
1. Introduction .......................................... 1
2. A PPP Network Control Protocol (NCP) for IP ........... 2
2.1 Sending IP Datagrams ............................ 2
3. IPCP Configuration Options ............................ 4
3.1 IP-Addresses .................................... 5
3.2 IP-Compression-Protocol ......................... 6
3.3 IP-Address ...................................... 8
4. Van Jacobson TCP/IP header compression ................ 9
4.1 Configuration Option Format ..................... 9
APPENDICES ................................................... 11
A. IPCP Recommended Options .............................. 11
SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS ...................................... 11
REFERENCES ................................................... 11
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................. 11
CHAIR'S ADDRESS .............................................. 12
AUTHOR'S ADDRESS ............................................. 12
McGregor [Page ii]
RFC 1332 PPP IPCP May 1992
1. Introduction
PPP has three main components:
1. A method for encapsulating datagrams over serial links.
2. A Link Control Protocol (LCP) for establishing, configuring,
and testing the data-link connection.
3. A family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing
and configuring different network-layer protocols.
In order to establish communications over a point-to-point link, each
end of the PPP link must first send LCP packets to configure and test
the data link. After the link has been established and optional
facilities have been negotiated as needed by the LCP, PPP must send
NCP packets to choose and configure one or more network-layer
protocols. Once each of the chosen network-layer protocols has been
configured, datagrams from each network-layer protocol can be sent
over the link.
The link will remain configured for communications until explicit LCP
or NCP packets close the link down, or until some external event
occurs (an inactivity timer expires or network administrator
intervention).
McGregor [Page 1]
RFC 1332 PPP IPCP May 1992
2. A PPP Network Control Protocol (NCP) for IP
The IP Control Protocol (IPCP) is responsible for configuring,
enabling, and disabling the IP protocol modules on both ends of the
point-to-point link. IPCP uses the same packet exchange machanism as
the Link Control Protocol (LCP). IPCP packets may not be exchanged
until PPP has reached the Network-Layer Protocol phase. IPCP packets
received before this phase is reached should be silently discarded.
The IP Control Protocol is exactly the same as the Link Control
Protocol [1] with the following exceptions:
Data Link Layer Protocol Field
Exactly one IPCP packet is encapsulated in the Information field
of PPP Data Link Layer frames where the Protocol field indicates
type hex 8021 (IP Control Protocol).
Code field
Only Codes 1 through 7 (Configure-Request, Configure-Ack,
Configure-Nak, Configure-Reject, Terminate-Request, Terminate-Ack
and Code-Reject) are used. Other Codes should be treated as
unrecognized and should result in Code-Rejects.
Timeouts
IPCP packets may not be exchanged until PPP has reached the
Network-Layer Protocol phase. An implementation should be
prepared to wait for Authentication and Link Quality Determination
to finish before timing out waiting for a Configure-Ack or other
response. It is suggested that an implementation give up only
after user intervention or a configurable amount of time.
Configuration Option Types
IPCP has a distinct set of Configuration Options, which are
defined below.
2.1. Sending IP Datagrams
Before any IP packets may be communicated, PPP must reach the
Network-Layer Protocol phase, and the IP Control Protocol must reach
the Opened state.
Exactly one IP packet is encapsulated in the Information field of PPP
Data Link Layer frames where the Protocol field indicates type hex
0021 (Internet Protocol).
McGregor [Page 2]
RFC 1332 PPP IPCP May 1992
The maximum length of an IP packet transmitted over a PPP link is the
same as the maximum length of the Information field of a PPP data
link layer frame. Larger IP datagrams must be fragmented as
necessary. If a system wishes to avoid fragmentation and reassembly,
it should use the TCP Maximum Segment Size option [4], and MTU
discovery [5].
McGregor [Page 3]
RFC 1332 PPP IPCP May 1992
3. IPCP Configuration Options
IPCP Configuration Options allow negotiatiation of desirable Internet
Protocol parameters. IPCP uses the same Configuration Option format
defined for LCP [1], with a separate set of Options.
The most up-to-date values of the IPCP Option Type field are specified
in the most recent "Assigned Numbers" RFC [6]. Current values are
assigned as follows:
1 IP-Addresses
2 IP-Compression-Protocol
3 IP-Address
McGregor [Page 4]
RFC 1332 PPP IPCP May 1992
3.1. IP-Addresses
Description
The use of the Configuration Option IP-Addresses has been
deprecated. It has been determined through implementation
experience that it is difficult to ensure negotiation convergence
in all cases using this option. RFC 1172 [7] provides information
for implementations requiring backwards compatability. The IP-
Address Configuration Option replaces this option, and its use is
preferred.
This option SHOULD NOT be sent in a Configure-Request if a
Configure-Request has been received which includes either an IP-
Addresses or IP-Address option. This option MAY be sent if a
Configure-Reject is received for the IP-Address option, or a
Configure-Nak is received with an IP-Addresses option as an
appended option.
Support for this option MAY be removed after the IPCP protocol
status advances to Internet Draft Standard.
McGregor [Page 5]
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?