rfc2358.txt
来自「RFC 的详细文档!」· 文本 代码 · 共 1,549 行 · 第 1/5 页
TXT
1,549 行
Network Working Group J. Flick
Request for Comments: 2358 Hewlett-Packard Company
Obsoletes: 1650 J. Johnson
Category: Standards Track RedBack Networks
June 1998
Definitions of Managed Objects for
the Ethernet-like Interface Types
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
This memo obsoletes RFC 1650 "Definitions of Managed Objects for the
Ethernet-like Interface Types using SMIv2". This memo extends that
specification by including management information useful for the
management of 100 Mb/s Ethernet interfaces.
Ethernet technology, as defined by the 802.3 Working Group of the
IEEE, continues to evolve, with scalable increases in speed, new
types of cabling and interfaces, and new features. This evolution
may require changes in the managed objects in order to reflect this
new functionality. This document, as with other documents issued by
this working group, reflect a certain stage in the evolution of
Ethernet technology. In the future, this document might be revised,
or new documents might be issued by the Ethernet Interfaces and Hub
MIB Working Group, in order to reflect the evolution of Ethernet
technology.
Flick & Johnson Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 2358 MIB for Ethernet-like Interface Types June 1998
Table of Contents
1. Introduction ................................................ 2
2. The SNMP Network Management Framework ...................... 2
2.1. Object Definitions ....................................... 3
3. Overview ................................................... 3
3.1. Relation to MIB-2 ........................................ 4
3.2. Relation to the Interfaces MIB ........................... 4
3.2.1. Layering Model ......................................... 4
3.2.2. Virtual Circuits ....................................... 4
3.2.3. ifTestTable ............................................ 5
3.2.4. ifRcvAddressTable ...................................... 5
3.2.5. ifPhysAddress .......................................... 5
3.2.6. ifType ................................................. 6
3.2.7. Specific Interface MIB Objects ......................... 7
3.3. Relation to the 802.3 MAU MIB ............................ 10
3.4. Mapping of IEEE 802.3 Managed Objects .................... 10
4. Definitions ................................................ 11
5. Intellectual Property ...................................... 34
6. Acknowledgements ........................................... 34
7. References ................................................. 35
8. Security Considerations .................................... 36
9. Authors' Addresses ......................................... 37
A. Change Log ................................................. 38
B. Full Copyright Statement ................................... 39
1. Introduction
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
In particular, it defines objects for managing ethernet-like
interfaces.
This memo also includes a MIB module. This MIB module extends the
list of managed objects specified in the earlier version of this MIB:
RFC1650 [11].
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [13].
2. The SNMP Network Management Framework
The SNMP Network Management Framework consists of several components.
For the purpose of this specification, the applicable components of
the Framework are the SMI and related documents [2, 3, 4], which
define the mechanisms used for describing and naming objects for the
purpose of management.
Flick & Johnson Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 2358 MIB for Ethernet-like Interface Types June 1998
The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of
experimentation and evaluation.
2.1. Object Definitions
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are
defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) [1]
defined in the SMI [2]. In particular, each object object type is
named by an OBJECT IDENTIFIER, an administratively assigned name.
The object type together with an object instance serves to uniquely
identify a specific instantiation of the object. For human
convenience, we often use a textual string, termed the descriptor, to
refer to the object type.
3. Overview
Instances of these object types represent attributes of an interface
to an ethernet-like communications medium. At present, ethernet-like
media are identified by the following values of the ifType object in
the Interfaces MIB [12]:
ethernetCsmacd(6)
iso88023Csmacd(7)
starLan(11)
The definitions presented here are based on the IEEE 802.3 Layer
Management Specification [5], as originally interpreted by Frank
Kastenholz then of Interlan in [7]. Implementors of these MIB
objects should note that the IEEE document explicitly describes (in
the form of Pascal pseudocode) when, where, and how various MAC
attributes are measured. The IEEE document also describes the
effects of MAC actions that may be invoked by manipulating instances
of the MIB objects defined here.
To the extent that some of the attributes defined in [5] are
represented by previously defined objects in MIB-2 [16] or in the
Interfaces MIB [12], such attributes are not redundantly represented
by objects defined in this memo. Among the attributes represented by
objects defined in other memos are the number of octets transmitted
or received on a particular interface, the number of frames
transmitted or received on a particular interface, the promiscuous
status of an interface, the MAC address of an interface, and
multicast information associated with an interface.
Flick & Johnson Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 2358 MIB for Ethernet-like Interface Types June 1998
3.1. Relation to MIB-2
This section applies only when this MIB is used in conjunction with
the "old" (RFC 1213) [16] interface group.
The relationship between an ethernet-like interface and an interface
in the context of the Internet-standard MIB is one-to-one. As such,
the value of an ifIndex object instance can be directly used to
identify corresponding instances of the objects defined herein.
For agents which implement the (now deprecated) ifSpecific object, an
instance of that object that is associated with an ethernet-like
interface has the OBJECT IDENTIFIER value:
dot3 OBJECT IDENTIFER ::= { transmission 7 }
3.2. Relation to the Interfaces MIB
The Interface MIB [12] requires that any MIB which is an adjunct of
the Interface MIB clarify specific areas within the Interface MIB.
These areas were intentionally left vague in the Interface MIB to
avoid over constraining the MIB, thereby precluding management of
certain media-types.
Section 3.3 of [12] enumerates several areas which a media-specific
MIB must clarify. Each of these areas is addressed in a following
subsection. The implementor is referred to [12] in order to
understand the general intent of these areas.
3.2.1. Layering Model
This MIB does not provide for layering. There are no sublayers.
EDITOR'S NOTE:
One could foresee the development of an 802.2 and enet-transceiver
MIB. They could be higher and lower sublayers, respectively. All
that THIS document should do is allude to the possibilities and urge
the implementor to be aware of the possibility and that they may have
requirements which supersede the requirements in this document.
3.2.2. Virtual Circuits
This medium does not support virtual circuits and this area is not
applicable to this MIB.
Flick & Johnson Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 2358 MIB for Ethernet-like Interface Types June 1998
3.2.3. ifTestTable
This MIB defines two tests for media which are instrumented with this
MIB; TDR and Loopback. Implementation of these tests is not
required. Many common interface chips do not support one or both of
these tests.
These two tests are provided as a convenience, allowing a common
method to invoke the test.
Standard MIBs do not include objects in which to return the results
of the TDR test. Any needed objects MUST be provided in the vendor
specific MIB.
Note that the ifTestTable is now deprecated. Work is underway to
define a replacement MIB for system and interface testing. It is
expected that the tests defined in this document will be usable in
this replacement MIB.
3.2.4. ifRcvAddressTable
This table contains all IEEE 802.3 addresses, unicast, multicast, and
broadcast, for which this interface will receive packets and forward
them up to a higher layer entity for local consumption. The format
of the address, contained in ifRcvAddressAddress, is the same as for
ifPhysAddress.
In the event that the interface is part of a MAC bridge, this table
does not include unicast addresses which are accepted for possible
forwarding out some other port. This table is explicitly not
intended to provide a bridge address filtering mechanism.
3.2.5. ifPhysAddress
This object contains the IEEE 802.3 address which is placed in the
source-address field of any Ethernet, Starlan, or IEEE 802.3 frames
that originate at this interface. Usually this will be kept in ROM
on the interface hardware. Some systems may set this address via
software.
In a system where there are several such addresses the designer has a
tougher choice. The address chosen should be the one most likely to
be of use to network management (e.g. the address placed in ARP
responses for systems which are primarily IP systems).
If the designer truly can not chose, use of the factory- provided ROM
address is suggested.
Flick & Johnson Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 2358 MIB for Ethernet-like Interface Types June 1998
If the address can not be determined, an octet string of zero length
should be returned.
The address is stored in binary in this object. The address is
stored in "canonical" bit order, that is, the Group Bit is positioned
as the low-order bit of the first octet. Thus, the first byte of a
multicast address would have the bit 0x01 set.
3.2.6. ifType
This MIB applies to interfaces which have any of the following ifType
values:
ethernetCsmacd(6)
iso88023Csmacd(7)
starLan(11)
It is RECOMMENDED that all Ethernet-like interfaces use an ifType of
ethernetCsmacd(6) regardless of the speed that the interface is
running or the link-layer encapsulation in use. iso88023Csmacd(7)
and starLan(11) are supported for backwards compatability.
There are two other interface types defined in the IANAifType-MIB for
100 Mbit Ethernet. They are fastEther(62), and fastEtherFX(69).
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?