rfc3055.txt

来自「RFC 的详细文档！」· 文本 代码 · 共 1,180 行 · 第 1/3 页

    DESCRIPTION
     "Entries in the gateway table.
     One entry is defined for each gateway identified by name,
     each monitored service type and performance statistics collection
     period."

    INDEX { pintRegisteredGatewayName, pintServerServiceTypeIndex,
    pintServerPerfStatPeriodIndex }
    ::= { pintServerGatewayStatsTable 1 }

PintServerGatewayStatsEntry     ::=  SEQUENCE {
pintServerGatewayCallsReceived                  Counter32,
pintServerGatewaySuccessfulCalls                Counter32,
pintServerGatewayDisconnectedCalls              Counter32
}

pintServerGatewayCallsReceived OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX     Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS read-only
    STATUS     current
    DESCRIPTION
     "Number of calls received at the specified gateway."
    ::= { pintServerGatewayStatsEntry 1 }

pintServerGatewaySuccessfulCalls OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX     Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS read-only
    STATUS     current
    DESCRIPTION
     "Number of calls successfully completed at the specified gateway."
    ::= { pintServerGatewayStatsEntry 2 }

pintServerGatewayDisconnectedCalls OBJECT-TYPE
    SYNTAX     Counter32
    MAX-ACCESS read-only
    STATUS     current
    DESCRIPTION
     "Number of calls that were disconnected (failed) at the specified
     gateway."
    ::= { pintServerGatewayStatsEntry 3 }

--
-- Notifications Section
-- (none defined)
--

--
-- Conformance Section



Krishnaswamy & Romascanu    Standards Track                    [Page 15]

RFC 3055                        PINT MIB                   February 2001


--

pintMibCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pintMibConformance 1 }
pintMibGroups      OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { pintMibConformance 2 }

pintMibCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS  current
DESCRIPTION
    "Describes the requirements for conformance to the
    PINT MIB."
MODULE  -- this module
MANDATORY-GROUPS { pintMibConfigGroup, pintMibMonitorGroup }
::= { pintMibCompliances 1 }

pintMibConfigGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
pintReleaseNumber,
pintSysContact,
pintApplInstallPkgDescription,
pintRegisteredGatewayName,
pintRegisteredGatewayDescription
}
STATUS  current
DESCRIPTION
    "A collection of objects providing configuration
    information
    for a PINT Server."
::= { pintMibGroups 1 }

pintMibMonitorGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
pintServerGlobalCallsReceived,
pintServerGlobalSuccessfulCalls,
pintServerGlobalDisconnectedCalls,
pintServerGlobalDisCUAutFCalls,
pintServerGlobalDisServProbCalls,
pintServerGlobalDisGatProbCalls,
pintServerClientCallsReceived,
pintServerClientSuccessfulCalls,
pintServerClientDisconnectedCalls,
pintServerClientDisCAutFCalls,
pintServerClientDisEFProbCalls,
--pintServerUserIdName,
pintServerUserIdCallsReceived,
pintServerUserIdSuccessfulCalls,
pintServerUserIdDisconnectedCalls,
pintServerUserIdDiscUIdAFailCalls,
pintServerUserIdEFProbCalls,



Krishnaswamy & Romascanu    Standards Track                    [Page 16]

RFC 3055                        PINT MIB                   February 2001


pintServerGatewayCallsReceived,
pintServerGatewaySuccessfulCalls,
pintServerGatewayDisconnectedCalls
}
STATUS  current
DESCRIPTION
    "A collection of objects providing monitoring
    information
    for a PINT Server."
::= { pintMibGroups 2 }

END

6. Acknowledgements

   The authors would like to thank Igor Faynberg for his encouragement
   to produce this work.

7.  Security Considerations

   There is only one management object defined in this MIB that has a
   MAX-ACCESS clause of read-write (pintSysContact).  There are no
   read-create objects.  This read-write object may be considered
   sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments.  The support
   for SET operations in a non-secure environment without proper
   protection can have a negative effect on network operations.

   There are a number of managed objects in this MIB that may contain
   information that may be sensitive from a business perspective.  One
   could be the customer identification (UserIdName).  Also information
   on PINT services performance might itself be need to be guarded.  It
   is thus important to control even GET access to these objects and
   possibly to even encrypt the values of these object when sending them
   over the network via SNMP.  Not all versions of SNMP provide features
   for such a secure environment.

   SNMPv1 by itself is not a secure environment.  Even if the network
   itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), even then, there is no
   control as to who on the secure network is allowed to access and
   GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this MIB.

   It is recommended that the implementers consider the security
   features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework.  Specifically, the use
   of the User-based Security Model RFC 2574 [13] and the View-based
   Access Control Model RFC 2575 [16] is recommended.






Krishnaswamy & Romascanu    Standards Track                    [Page 17]

RFC 3055                        PINT MIB                   February 2001


   It is then a customer/user responsibility to ensure that the SNMP
   entity giving access to an instance of this MIB, is properly
   configured to give access to the objects only to those principals
   (users) that have legitimate rights to indeed GET or SET
   (change/create/delete) them.

8. IANA Considerations

   All extensions to the values listed in this MIB must be done through
   Standards Action processes as defined in RFC 2434 [20].

9. Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
   has made any effort to identify any such rights.  Information on the
   IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
   standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11.  Copies of
   claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
   licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
   obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
   proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
   be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF Executive
   Director.

10. References

   [1]  Lu, H., Conroy, L., Bellovin, S., Krishnaswamy, M., Burg, F.,
        DeSimone, A., Tewani, K., Davidson, P., Schulzrinne, H. and K.
        Vishwanathan,  "Toward the PSTN/Internet Inter-Networking --
        Pre-PINT Implementations", RFC 2458, November 1998.

   [2]  Wijnen, B., Harrington, D. and R. Presuhn, "An Architecture for
        Describing SNMP Management Frameworks", RFC 2571, April 1999.

   [3]  Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of
        Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets", STD 16, RFC
        1155, May 1990.





Krishnaswamy & Romascanu    Standards Track                    [Page 18]

RFC 3055                        PINT MIB                   February 2001


   [4]  Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16,
        RFC 1212, March 1991.

   [5]  Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the
        SNMP", RFC 1215, March 1991.

   [6]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D. and J. Schoenwaelder, "Structure of
        Management Information Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578,
        April 1999.

   [7]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D. and J. Schoenwaelder, "Textual
        Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.

   [8]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D. and J. Schoenwaelder, "Conformance
        Statements for SMIv2", STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.

   [9]  Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin, "Simple
        Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, May 1990.

   [10]  Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser,
        "Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2", RFC 1901, January
        1996.

   [11] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Transport
        Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol
        (SNMPv2)", RFC 1906, January 1996.

   [12] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R. and B. Wijnen, "Message
        Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management
        Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2572, April 1999.

   [13] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model (USM)
        for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol
        (SNMPv3)", RFC 2574, April 1999.

   [14] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and Waldbusser, "Protocol
        Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management
        Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996.

   [15] Levi, D., Meyer, P. and B. Stewart, "SNMPv3 Applications", RFC
        2573, April 1999.

   [16] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access
        Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol
        (SNMP)", RFC 2575, April 1999.






Krishnaswamy & Romascanu    Standards Track                    [Page 19]

RFC 3055                        PINT MIB                   February 2001


   [17] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D. and B. Stewart, "Introduction
        to Version 3 of the Internet-standard Network Management
        Framework", RFC 2570, April 1999.

   [18] Petrack, S. and L. Conroy, "The PINT Service Protocol:
        Extensions to SIP and SDP for IP Access to Telephone Call
        Services", RFC 2848, June 2000.

   [19] Krupczak, C. and J. Saperia, "Definitions of System-Level
        Managed Objects for Applications", RFC 2287, February 1998.

   [20] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an IANA
        Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 2434, October 1998.

11. Authors' Addresses

   Murali Krishnaswamy
   Lucent Technologies
   3C-512, 101 Crawfords Corner Rd.
   Holmdel, NJ 07733

   Phone: [phone]
   Fax:   [phone]
   EMail: [e-mail]


   Dan Romascanu
   Avaya Communication
   Atidim Technology Park, Bldg 3
   Tel Aviv, Israel

   Phone: [phone]
   EMail: [e-mail]


















Krishnaswamy & Romascanu    Standards Track                    [Page 20]

RFC 3055                        PINT MIB                   February 2001


12. Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2001).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.



















Krishnaswamy & Romascanu    Standards Track                    [Page 21]