rfc1769.txt
来自「RFC 的详细文档!」· 文本 代码 · 共 788 行 · 第 1/3 页
TXT
788 行
Network Working Group D. Mills
Request for Comments: 1769 University of Delaware
Obsoletes: 1361 March 1995
Category: Informational
Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP)
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of
this memo is unlimited.
Abstract
This memorandum describes the Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP),
which is an adaptation of the Network Time Protocol (NTP) used to
synchronize computer clocks in the Internet. SNTP can be used when
the ultimate performance of the full NTP implementation described in
RFC-1305 is not needed or justified. It can operate in both unicast
modes (point to point) and broadcast modes (point to multipoint). It
can also operate in IP multicast mode where this service is
available. SNTP involves no change to the current or previous NTP
specification versions or known implementations, but rather a
clarification of certain design features of NTP which allow operation
in a simple, stateless remote-procedure call (RPC) mode with accuracy
and reliability expectations similar to the UDP/TIME protocol
described in RFC-868.
This memorandum obsoletes RFC-1361 of the same title. Its purpose is
to explain the protocol model for operation in broadcast mode, to
provide additional clarification in some places and to correct a few
typographical errors. A working knowledge of the NTP Version 3
specification RFC-1305 is not required for an implementation of SNTP.
Distribution of this memorandum is unlimited.
1. Introduction
The Network Time Protocol (NTP) specified in RFC-1305 [MIL92] is used
to synchronize computer clocks in the global Internet. It provides
comprehensive mechanisms to access national time and frequency
dissemination services, organize the time-synchronization subnet and
adjust the local clock in each participating subnet peer. In most
places of the Internet of today, NTP provides accuracies of 1-50 ms,
depending on the characteristics of the synchronization source and
network paths.
Mills [Page 1]
RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
RFC-1305 specifies the NTP protocol machine in terms of events,
states, transition functions and actions and, in addition, optional
algorithms to improve the timekeeping quality and mitigate among
several, possibly faulty, synchronization sources. To achieve
accuracies in the low milliseconds over paths spanning major portions
of the Internet of today, these intricate algorithms, or their
functional equivalents, are necessary. However, in many cases
accuracies of this order are not required and something less, perhaps
in the order of large fractions of the second, is sufficient. In such
cases simpler protocols such as the Time Protocol [POS83], have been
used for this purpose. These protocols usually involve an RPC
exchange where the client requests the time of day and the server
returns it in seconds past some known reference epoch.
NTP is designed for use by clients and servers with a wide range of
capabilities and over a wide range of network delays and jitter
characteristics. Most users of the Internet NTP synchronization
subnet of today use a software package including the full suite of
NTP options and algorithms, which are relatively complex, real-time
applications. While the software has been ported to a wide variety of
hardware platforms ranging from supercomputers to personal computers,
its sheer size and complexity is not appropriate for many
applications. Accordingly, it is useful to explore alternative access
strategies using far simpler software appropriate for less stringent
accuracy expectations.
This memorandum describes the Simple Network Time Protocol (SNTP),
which is a simplified access strategy for servers and clients using
NTP as now specified and deployed in the Internet. There are no
changes to the protocol or implementations now running or likely to
be implemented in the near future. The access paradigm is identical
to the UDP/TIME Protocol and, in fact, it should be easily possible
to adapt a UDP/TIME client implementation, say for a personal
computer, to operate using SNTP. Moreover, SNTP is also designed to
operate in a dedicated server configuration including an integrated
radio clock. With careful design and control of the various latencies
in the system, which is practical in a dedicated design, it is
possible to deliver time accurate to the order of microseconds.
It is strongly recommended that SNTP be used only at the extremities
of the synchronization subnet. SNTP clients should operate only at
the leaves (highest stratum) of the subnet and in configurations
where no NTP or SNTP client is dependent on another SNTP client for
synchronization. SNTP servers should operate only at the root
(stratum 1) of the subnet and then only in configurations where no
other source of synchronization other than a reliable radio clock is
available. The full degree of reliability ordinarily expected of
primary servers is possible only using the redundant sources, diverse
Mills [Page 2]
RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
subnet paths and crafted algorithms of a full NTP implementation.
This extends to the primary source of synchronization itself in the
form of multiple radio clocks and backup paths to other primary
servers should the radio clock fail or deliver incorrect time.
Therefore, the use of SNTP rather than NTP in primary servers should
be carefully considered.
2. Operating Modes and Addressing
Like NTP, SNTP can operate in either unicast (point to point) or
broadcast (point to multipoint) modes. A unicast client sends a
request to a server and expects a reply from which it can determine
the time and, optionally, the roundtrip delay and local clock offset
relative to the server. A broadcast server periodically sends a
message to a designated IP broadcast address or IP multicast group
address and ordinarily expects no requests from clients, while a
broadcast client listens on this address and ordinarily sends no
requests to servers. Some broadcast servers may elect to respond to
client requests as well as send unsolicited broadcast messages, while
some broadcast clients may elect to send requests only in order to
determine the network propagation delay between the server and
client.
In unicast mode the client and server IP addresses are assigned
following the usual conventions. In broadcast mode the server uses a
designated IP broadcast address or IP multicast group address,
together with a designated media-access broadcast address, and the
client listens on these addresses. For this purpose, an IP broadcast
address has scope limited to a single IP subnet, since routers do not
propagate IP broadcast datagrams. In the case of Ethernets, for
example, the Ethernet media-access broadcast address (all ones) is
used with an IP address consisting of the IP subnet number in the net
field and all ones in the host field.
On the other hand, an IP multicast group address has scope extending
to potentially the entire Internet. The actual scope, group
membership and routing are determined by the Internet Group
Management Protocol (IGMP) [DEE89] and various routing protocols,
which are beyond the scope of this document. In the case of
Ethernets, for example, the Ethernet media-access broadcast address
(all ones) is used with the assigned IP multicast group address of
224.0.1.1. Other than the IP addressing conventions and IGMP, there
is no difference in server operations with either the IP broadcast
address or IP multicast group address.
Broadcast clients listen on the designated media-access broadcast
address, such as all ones in the case of Ethernets. In the case of IP
broadcast addresses, no further provisions are necessary. In the case
Mills [Page 3]
RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
of IP multicast group addresses, the host may need to implement IGMP
in order that the local router intercepts messages to the 224.0.1.1
multicast group. These considerations are beyond the scope of this
document.
In the case of SNTP as specified herein, there is a very real
vulnerability that SNTP multicast clients can be disrupted by
misbehaving or hostile SNTP or NTP multicast servers elsewhere in the
Internet, since at present all such servers use the same IP multicast
group address 224.0.1.1. Where necessary, access control based on the
server source address can be used to select only those servers known
to and trusted by the client. Alternatively, by convention and
informal agreement, all NTP multicast servers now include an MD5-
encrypted message digest in every message, so that clients can
determine if the message is authentic and not modified in transit. It
is in principle possible that SNTP clients could implement the
necessary encryption and key-distribution schemes, but this is
considered not likely in the simple systems for which SNTP is
intended.
While not integral to the SNTP specification, it is intended that IP
broadcast addresses will be used primarily in IP subnets and LAN
segments including a fully functional NTP server with a number of
SNTP clients in the same subnet, while IP multicast group addresses
will be used only in special cases engineered for the purpose. In
particular, IP multicast group addresses should be used in SNTP
servers only if the server implements the NTP authentication scheme
described in RFC-1305, including support for the MD5 message-digest
algorithm.
3. NTP Timestamp Format
SNTP uses the standard NTP timestamp format described in RFC-1305 and
previous versions of that document. In conformance with standard
Internet practice, NTP data are specified as integer or fixed-point
quantities, with bits numbered in big-endian fashion from 0 starting
at the left, or high-order, position. Unless specified otherwise, all
quantities are unsigned and may occupy the full field width with an
implied 0 preceding bit 0.
Since NTP timestamps are cherished data and, in fact, represent the
main product of the protocol, a special timestamp format has been
established. NTP timestamps are represented as a 64-bit unsigned
fixed-point number, in seconds relative to 0h on 1 January 1900. The
integer part is in the first 32 bits and the fraction part in the
last 32 bits. In the fraction part, the non-significant low-order
bits should be set to 0. This format allows convenient multiple-
precision arithmetic and conversion to UDP/TIME representation
Mills [Page 4]
RFC 1769 SNTP March 1995
(seconds), but does complicate the conversion to ICMP Timestamp
message representation (milliseconds). The precision of this
representation is about 200 picoseconds, which should be adequate for
even the most exotic requirements.
1 2 3
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Seconds |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
| Seconds Fraction (0-padded) |
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
Note that, since some time in 1968 the most significant bit (bit 0 of
the integer part) has been set and that the 64-bit field will
overflow some time in 2036. Should NTP or SNTP be in use in 2036,
some external means will be necessary to qualify time relative to
1900 and time relative to 2036 (and other multiples of 136 years).
Timestamped data requiring such qualification will be so precious
that appropriate means should be readily available. There will exist
a 200-picosecond interval, henceforth ignored, every 136 years when
the 64-bit field will be 0, which by convention is interpreted as an
invalid or unavailable timestamp.
4. NTP Message Format
Both NTP and SNTP are clients of the User Datagram Protocol (UDP)
[POS80], which itself is a client of the Internet Protocol (IP)
[DAR81]. The structure of the IP and UDP headers is described in the
cited specification documents and will not be described further here.
The UDP port number assigned to NTP is 123, which should be used in
both the Source Port and Destination Port fields in the UDP header.
The remaining UDP header fields should be set as described in the
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?