📄 rfc1229.txt
字号:
Network Working Group K. McCloghrie, Editor
Request for Comments: 1229 Hughes LAN Systems, Inc.
May 1991
Extensions to the Generic-Interface MIB
Status of this Memo
This RFC contains definitions of managed objects used as experimental
extensions to the generic interfaces structure of MIB-II. This memo
is a product of the SNMP Working Group of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). This RFC specifies an IAB standards track
protocol for the Internet community, and requests discussion and
suggestions for improvements. Please refer to the current edition of
the "IAB Official Protocol Standards" for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Table of Contents
1. Abstract .............................................. 1
2. The Network Management Framework....................... 1
3. Objects ............................................... 2
4. Overview .............................................. 3
4.1 Generic Interface Extension Table .................... 3
4.2 Generic Interface Test Table ......................... 3
4.3 Generic Receive Address Table ........................ 4
5. Definitions ........................................... 5
6. Acknowledgements ...................................... 14
7. References ............................................ 15
8. Security Considerations................................ 15
9. Author's Address....................................... 16
1. Abstract
This memo defines an experimental portion of the Management
Information Base (MIB) for use with network management protocols in
TCP/IP-based internets. In particular, it defines managed object
types as experimental extensions to the generic interfaces structure
of MIB-II.
2. The Network Management Framework
The Internet-standard Network Management Framework consists of three
components. They are:
RFC 1155 which defines the SMI, the mechanisms used for describing
and naming objects for the purpose of management. RFC 1212
SNMP Working Group [Page 1]
RFC 1229 Interface MIB Extensions May 1991
defines a more concise description mechanism, which is wholly
consistent with the SMI.
RFC 1156 which defines MIB-I, the core set of managed objects for
the Internet suite of protocols. RFC 1213, defines MIB-II, an
evolution of MIB-I based on implementation experience and new
operational requirements.
RFC 1157 which defines the SNMP, the protocol used for network
access to managed objects.
The Framework permits new objects to be defined for the purpose of
experimentation and evaluation.
3. Objects
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are
defined using the subset of Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1) [7]
defined in the SMI. In particular, each object has a name, a syntax,
and an encoding. The name is an object identifier, an
administratively assigned name, which specifies an object type. The
object type together with an object instance serves to uniquely
identify a specific instantiation of the object. For human
convenience, we often use a textual string, termed the OBJECT
DESCRIPTOR, to also refer to the object type.
The syntax of an object type defines the abstract data structure
corresponding to that object type. The ASN.1 language is used for
this purpose. However, the SMI [3] purposely restricts the ASN.1
constructs which may be used. These restrictions are explicitly made
for simplicity.
The encoding of an object type is simply how that object type is
represented using the object type's syntax. Implicitly tied to the
notion of an object type's syntax and encoding is how the object type
is represented when being transmitted on the network.
The SMI specifies the use of the basic encoding rules of ASN.1 [8],
subject to the additional requirements imposed by the SNMP.
Section 5 contains the specification of all object types in this
section of the MIB. The object types are defined using the
conventions specified in the SMI, as amended by the extensions
specified in [9].
SNMP Working Group [Page 2]
RFC 1229 Interface MIB Extensions May 1991
4. Overview
The Internet Standard MIB [4,6] contains a group of management
objects pertaining to a network device's generic network
interface(s). These objects are generic in the sense that they apply
to all network interfaces, irrespective of the type of communication
media and protocols used on such interfaces. This has proved to be
necessary but not sufficient; there are efforts underway to define
additional MIB objects which are specific to particular media and
lower-level (subnetwork-layer and below) protocol stacks.
However, some of these efforts have identified objects which are
required (or at least useful), but are not specific to the
interface-type on which the effort is focusing. In order to avoid
redundancy, it is better that such objects be defined as extensions
to the generic interface group, rather than defined in multiple
specific-interface-type MIBs.
This memo defines the resultant extensions to the generic interface
group. These extensions are spread over three tables: the generic
Interface Extension table, the generic Interface Test table, and the
generic Receive Address table.
4.1. Generic Interface Extension Table
This table consists of new objects applicable to all types of
subnetwork interface.
4.2. Generic Interface Test Table
This section defines objects which allow a network manager to
instruct an agent to test an interface for various faults. A few
common types of tests are defined in this document but most will be
defined elsewhere, dependent on the particular type of interface.
After testing, the object ifExtnsTestResult can be read to determine
the outcome. If an agent cannot perform the test, ifExtnsTestResult
is set to so indicate. The object ifExtnsTestCode can be used to
provide further test-specific or interface-specific (or even
enterprise-specific) information concerning the outcome of the test.
Only one test can be in progress on each interface at any one time.
If one test is in progress when another test is invoked, the second
test is rejected. Some agents may reject a test when a prior test is
active on another interface.
When a test is invoked, the identity of the originator of the request
and the request-id are saved by the agent in the objects
ifExtnsTestRequestId and ifExtnsTestCommunity. These values remain
set until the next test is invoked. In the (rare) event that the
SNMP Working Group [Page 3]
RFC 1229 Interface MIB Extensions May 1991
invocation of tests by two network managers were to overlap, then
there would be a possibility that the first test's results might be
overwritten by the second test's results prior to the first results
being read. This unlikely circumstance can be detected by a network
manager retrieving ifExtnsTestCommunity, and ifExtnsTestRequestId at
the same time as the test results are retrieved, and ensuring that
the results are for the desired request.
In general, a Management station must not retransmit a request to
invoke a test for which it does not receive a response; instead, it
properly inspects an agent's MIB to determine if the invocation was
successful. The invocation request is retransmitted only if the
invocation was unsuccessful.
Some tests may require the interface to be taken off-line or may even
require the agent to be rebooted after completion of the test. In
these circumstances, communication with the management station
invoking the test may be lost until after completion of the test.
The agent should make every effort to transmit a response to the
request that invoked the test prior to losing communication. When
the agent is restored to normal service, the results of the test are
properly made available in the appropriate objects. Note that this
requires that the ifIndex value assigned to an interface must be
unchanged even if the test causes a reboot. An agent must reject any
test for which it cannot, perhaps due to resource constraints, make
available at least the minimum amount of information after that test
completes.
4.3. Generic Receive Address Table
This table contains objects relating to an interface's support for
receiving packets/frames at more than one address on the same
interface.
SNMP Working Group [Page 4]
RFC 1229 Interface MIB Extensions May 1991
5. Definitions
RFC1229-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
-- Extensions to MIB-II's Generic Interface Table
IMPORTS
experimental, Counter FROM RFC1155-SMI
DisplayString, PhysAddress FROM RFC1213-MIB
OBJECT-TYPE FROM RFC-1212;
ifExtensions OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { experimental 6 }
-- Generic Interface Extension Table
--
-- This group of objects is mandatory for all types of
-- subnetwork interface.
ifExtnsTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF IfExtnsEntry
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"A list of interfaces extension entries.
The number of entries is given by the value
of ifNumber, defined in [4,6]."
::= { ifExtensions 1 }
ifExtnsEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX IfExtnsEntry
ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS mandatory
DESCRIPTION
"An extension to the interfaces entry,
defined in [4,6], containing additional
objects at the subnetwork layer and below
for a particular interface."
INDEX { ifExtnsIfIndex }
::= { ifExtnsTable 1 }
IfExtnsEntry ::=
SEQUENCE {
ifExtnsIfIndex
SNMP Working Group [Page 5]
RFC 1229 Interface MIB Extensions May 1991
INTEGER,
ifExtnsChipSet
OBJECT IDENTIFIER,
ifExtnsRevWare
DisplayString,
ifExtnsMulticastsTransmittedOks
Counter,
ifExtnsBroadcastsTransmittedOks
Counter,
ifExtnsMulticastsReceivedOks
Counter,
ifExtnsBroadcastsReceivedOks
Counter,
ifExtnsPromiscuous
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -