rfc899.txt

来自「RFC 的详细文档！」· 文本 代码 · 共 1,063 行 · 第 1/3 页

Network Working Group                                          J. Postel
Request for Comments: 899                                     A. Westine
                                                                     ISI
                                                                May 1984


                     Requests For Comments Summary
                             Notes: 800-899

Status of this Memo

   This RFC is a slightly annotated list of the 100 RFCs from RFC 800
   through RFC 899.  This is a status report on these RFCs.

RFC     Author       Date        Title
---     ------       ----        -----

899     Postel       Apr 84      Requests For Comments Summary

   This memo.

898     Hinden       Apr 84      Gateway Special Interest Group Meeting
                                 Notes

   This memo is a report on the Gateway Special Interest Group Meeting
   that was held at ISI on 28 and 29 February 1984.  Robert Hinden of
   BBNCC chaired, and Jon Postel of ISI hosted the meeting.
   Approximately 35 gateway designers and implementors attended.  These
   notes are based on the recollections of Jon Postel and Mike Muuss.
   Under each topic area are Jon Postel's brief notes, and additional
   details from Mike Muuss.  This memo is a report on a meeting.  No
   conclusions, decisions, or policy statements are documented in this
   note.

897     Postel       Feb 84      Domain Name System Implementation
                                 Schedule

   This memo is a policy statement on the implementation of the Domain
   Style Naming System in the Internet.  This memo is a partial update
   of RFC 881.  The intent of this memo is to detail the schedule for
   the implementation for the Domain Style Naming System.  The names of
   hosts will be changed to domain style names.  Hosts will begin to use
   domain style names on 14-Mar-84, and the use of old style names will
   be completely phased out before 2-May-84.  This applies to both the
   ARPA research hosts and the DDN operational hosts.  This is an
   official policy statement of the ICCB and the DARPA.









Postel & Westine                                                [page 1]



RFC 899                                                         May 1984


896     Nagle        Jan 84      Congestion Control in IP/TCP
                                 Internetworks

   This memo discusses some aspects of congestion control in IP/TCP
   Internetworks.  It is intended to stimulate thought and further
   discussion of this topic.  While some specific suggestions are made
   for improved congestion control implementation, this memo does not
   specify any standards.

895     Postel       Apr 84      A Standard for the Transmission of
                                 IP Datagrams over Experimental Ethernet
                                 Networks

   This RFC specifies a standard method of encapsulating Internet
   Protocol (IP) datagrams on an Experimental Ethernet.  This RFC
   specifies a standard protocol for the ARPA Internet community.

894     Hornig       Apr 84      A Standard for the Transmission of
                                 IP Datagrams over Ethernet Networks

   This RFC specifies a standard method of encapsulating Internet
   Protocol (IP) datagrams on an Ethernet.  This RFC specifies a
   standard protocol for the ARPA-Internet community.

893     Leffler      Apr 84      Trailer Encapsulations

   This RFC discusses the motivation for use of "trailer encapsulations"
   on local-area networks and describes the implementation of such an
   encapsulation on various media.  This document is for information
   only.  This is NOT an official protocol for the ARPA Internet
   community.

892     ISO          Dec 83      ISO Transport Protocol Specification

   This is a draft version of the transport protocol being standardized
   by the ISO.  This version also appeared in the ACM SIGCOMM Computer
   Communication Review (V.12, N.3-4) July-October 1982.  This version
   is now out of date.

891     Mills        Dec 83      DCN Local-Network Protocols

   This RFC provides a description of the DCN protocols for maintaining
   connectivity, routing, and clock information in a local network.
   These procedures may be of interest to the designers and implementers
   of other local networks.







Postel & Westine                                                [page 2]



RFC 899                                                         May 1984


890     Postel       Feb 84      Exterior Gateway Protocol
                                 Implementation Schedule

   This memo is a policy statement on the implementation of the Exterior
   Gateway Protocol in the Internet.  This is an official policy
   statement of ICCB and DARPA.  After 1-Aug-84 there shall be no dumb
   gateways in the Internet. Every gateway must be a member of some
   autonomous system.  Some gateway of each autonomous system must
   exchange routing information with some gateway of the core autonomous
   system using the Exterior Gateway Protocol.

889     Mills        Dec 83      Internet Delay Experiments

   This memo reports on some measurements of round-trip times in the
   Internet and suggests some possible improvements to the TCP
   retransmission timeout calculation.  This memo is both a status
   report on the Internet and advice to TCP implementers.

888     Seamonson    Jan 84      "Stub" Exterior Gateway Protocol

   This RFC describes the Exterior Gateway Protocol used to connect Stub
   Gateways to an Autonomous System of core Gateways.  This document
   specifies the working protocol, and defines an ARPA official
   protocol.  All implementers of Gateways should carefully review this
   document.

887     Accetta      Dec 83      Resource Location Protocol

   This RFC specifies a draft standard for the ARPA Internet community.
   It describes a resource location protocol for use in the ARPA
   Internet.  It is most useful on networks employing technologies which
   support some method of broadcast addressing, however it may also be
   used on other types of networks.  For maximum benefit, all hosts
   which provide significant resources or services to other hosts on the
   Internet should implement this protocol.  Hosts failing to implement
   the Resource Location Protocol risk being ignored by other hosts
   which are attempting to locate resources on the Internet.

886     Rose         Dec 83      Proposed Standard for Message Header
                                 Munging

   This RFC specifies a draft standard for the ARPA Internet community.
   It describes the rules to be used when transforming mail from the
   conventions of one message system to those of another message system.
   In particular, the treatment of header fields, and recipient
   addresses is specified.






Postel & Westine                                                [page 3]



RFC 899                                                         May 1984


885     Postel       Dec 83      Telnet End of Record Option

   This RFC specifies a standard for the ARPA Internet community.  It
   specifies a method for marking the end of records in data transmitted
   on Telnet connections.

884     Solomon      Dec 83      Telnet Terminal Type Option

   This RFC specifies a standard for the ARPA Internet community.  It
   specifies a method for exchanging terminal type information in the
   Telnet protocol.

883     Mockapetris  Nov 83      Domain Names - Implementation and
                                 Specification

   This RFC discusses the implementation of domain name servers and
   resolvers, specifies the format of transactions, and discusses the
   use of domain names in the context of existing mail systems and other
   network software.

882     Mockapetris  Nov 83      Domain Names - Concepts and Facilities

   This RFC introduces domain style names, their use for ARPA Internet
   mail and host address support, and the protocol and servers used to
   implement domain name facilities.

881     Postel       Nov 83      The Domain Names Plan and Schedule

   This RFC outlines a plan and schedule for the implementation of
   domain style names throughout the DDN/ARPA Internet community.  The
   introduction of domain style names will impact all hosts on the
   DDN/ARPA Internet.

880     Reynolds     Oct 83      Official Protocols

   This RFC identifies the documents specifying the official protocols
   used in the ARPA Internet.  Annotations identify any revisions or
   changes planned.  Obsoletes RFC 840.

879     Postel       Nov 83      The TCP Maximum Segment Size and
                                 Related Topics

   This RFC discusses the TCP Maximum Segment Size Option and related
   topics.  The purposes is to clarify some aspects of TCP and its
   interaction with IP.  This memo is a clarification to the TCP
   specification, and contains information that may be considered as
   "advice to implementers".





Postel & Westine                                                [page 4]



RFC 899                                                         May 1984


878     Malis        Dec 83      The ARPANET 1822L Host Access Protocol

   This RFC specifies the ARPANET 1822L Host Access Protocol, which is a
   successor to the existing 1822 Host Access Protocol.  The 1822L
   procedure allows ARPANET hosts to use logical identifiers as well as
   1822 physical interface identifiers to address each other.

877     Korb         Sep 83      A Standard for the Transmission of IP
                                 Datagrams Over Public Data Networks

   This RFC specifies a standard adopted by CSNET, the VAN gateway, and
   other organizations for the transmission of IP datagrams over the
   X.25-based public data networks.

876     Smallberg    Sep 83      Survey of SMTP Implementations

   This RFC is a survey of implementation status.  It does not specify
   an official protocol, but rather notes the status of implementation
   of aspects of a protocol.  It is expected that the status of the
   hosts reported on will change.  This information must be treated as a
   snapshot of the state of these implemetations.

875     Padlipsky    Sep 82      Gateways, Architectures, and Heffalumps

   This RFC is a discussion about the role of gateways in an
   internetwork, especially the problems of translating or mapping
   protocols between different protocol suites.  The discussion notes
   possible functionality mis-matches, undesirable routing "singularity
   points", flow control issues, and high cost of translating gateways.
   Originally published as M82-51 by the MITRE Corporation, Bedford,
   Massachusetts.

874     Padlipsky    Sep 82      A Critique of X.25

   This RFC is an analysis of X.25 pointing out some problems in the
   conceptual model, particularly the conflict between the interface
   aspects and the end-to-end aspects.  The memo also touches on
   security, and implementation issues.  Originally published as M82-50
   by the MITRE Corporation, Bedford, Massachusetts.

873     Padlipsky    Sep 82      The Illusion of Vendor Support

   This memo takes issue with the claim that international standards in
   computer protocols presently provide a basis for low cost vendor
   supported protocol implementations.  Originally published as M82-49
   by the MITRE Corporation, Bedford, Massachusetts.






Postel & Westine                                                [page 5]



RFC 899                                                         May 1984


872     Padlipsky    Sep 82      TCP-ON-A-LAN

   This memo attacks the notion that TCP cannot be appropriate for use
   on a Local Area Network.  Originally published as M82-48 by the MITRE
   Corporation, Bedford Massachusetts.

871     Padlipsky    Sep 82      A Perspective on the Arpanet Reference
                                 Model

   This RFC is primarily intended as a perspective on the ARM and points
   out some of the differences between the ARM and the ISORM  which were
   expressed by members in NWG general meetings, NWG protocol design
   committee meetings, the ARPA Internet Working Group, and private
   conversations over the intervening years.  Originally published as
   M82-47 by the MITRE Corporation, Bedford, Massachusetts.

870     Reynolds     Oct 83      Assigned Numbers

   This RFC documents the list of numbers assigned for networks,
   protocols, etc.  Obsoletes RFCs 820, 790, 776, 770, 762, 758, 755,
   750, 739, 604.

869     Hinden       Dec 83      A Host Monitoring Protocol

   This RFC specifies the Host Monitoring Protocol used to collect
   information from various types of hosts in the Internet.  Designers
   of Internet communications software are encouraged to consider this
   protocol as a means of monitoring the behavior of their creations.

868     Postel       May 83      Time Protocol

   This RFC specifies a standard for the ARPA Internet community.  Hosts
   on the ARPA Internet that choose to implement a Time Protocol are
   expected to adopt and implement this standard.  This protocol
   provides a site-independent, machine readable date and time.  The
   Time service sends back to the originating source the time in seconds
   since midnight on January first 1900.

867     Postel       May 83      Daytime Protocol

   This RFC specifies a standard for the ARPA Internet community.  Hosts
   on the ARPA Internet that choose to implement a Daytime Protocol are
   expected to adopt and implement this standard.  The Daytime service
   simply sends the current date and time as a character string without
   regard to the input.







Postel & Westine                                                [page 6]