📄 rfc1999.txt
字号:
Automatic Network Address Acquisition
This memo describes extensions to the Reverse Address Resolution
Protocol (RARP [2]) and called Dynamic RARP (DRARP, pronounced D-RARP).
This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not define an Internet standard of any kind.
1930 Hawkinson Mar 96 Guidelines for creation, selection, and
registration of an Autonomous System (AS)
This memo discusses when it is appropriate to register and utilize an
Autonomous System (AS), and lists criteria for such. This document
specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community,
and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
1929 Leech Mar 96 Username/Password Authentication for
SOCKS V5
The protocol specification for SOCKS Version 5 specifies a generalized
framework for the use of arbitrary authentication protocols in the
initial socks connection setup. This document describes one of those
protocols, as it fits into the SOCKS Version 5 authentication
"subnegotiation". [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Elliott Informational [Page 14]
RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 January 1997
1928 Leech Mar 96 SOCKS Protocol Version 5
This memo describes a protocol that is an evolution of the previous
version of the protocol, version 4 [1]. This new protocol stems from
active discussions and prototype implementations. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
1927 Rogers Apr 96 Suggested Additional MIME Types for
Associating Documents
Seven new types of MIME types are suggested in this document. This memo
provides information for the Internet community. This memo does not
specify an Internet standard of any kind.
1926 Eriksson Apr 96 An Experimental Encapsulation of IP
Datagrams on Top of ATM
This RFC describes a method of encapsulating IP datagrams on top of
Acoustical Transmission Media (ATM). This is a non-recommended
standard. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
1925 Callon Apr 96 The Twelve Networking Truths
This memo documents the fundamental truths of networking for the
Internet community. This memo does not specify a standard, except in the
sense that all standards must implicitly follow the fundamental truths.
This memo provides information for the Internet community. This memo
does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
1924 Elz Apr 96 A Compact Representation of IPv6 Addresses
This document specifies a more compact representation of IPv6 addresses,
which permits encoding in a mere 20 bytes. This memo provides
information for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an
Internet standard of any kind.
Elliott Informational [Page 15]
RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 January 1997
1923 Halpern Mar 96 RIPv1 Applicability Statement for
Historic Status
RIP Version 1 [RFC-1058] has been declared an historic document. This
Applicability statement provides the supporting motivation for that
declaration. The primary reason, as described below, is the Classful
nature of RIPv1. This memo provides information for the Internet
community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
1922 Zhu Mar 96 Chinese Character Encoding for Internet
Messages
This memo describes methods of transporting Chinese characters in
Internet services which transport text, such as electronic mail
[RFC-822], network news [RFC-1036], telnet [RFC-854] and the World Wide
Web [RFC-1866]. This memo provides information for the Internet
community. It does not specify an Internet standard.
1921 Dujonc Mar 96 TNVIP Protocol
The goal of this document specifies a Telnet profile to support VIP
terminal emulation allowing the access to the BULL hosts applications
through a TCP/IP network. This memo provides information for the
Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of
any kind.
1920 I.A.B. Mar 96 INTERNET OFFICIAL PROTOCOL STANDARDS
This memo describes the state of standardization of protocols used in
the Internet as determined by the Internet Architecture Board (IAB).
[STANDARDS-TRACK]
1919 Chatel Mar 96 Classical versus Transparent IP Proxies
This document explains "classical" and "transparent" proxy techniques
and attempts to provide rules to help determine when each proxy system
may be used without causing problems. This memo provides information
for the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet
standard of any kind.
Elliott Informational [Page 16]
RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 January 1997
1918 Rekhter Feb 96 Address Allocation for Private Internets
This document describes address allocation for private internets. This
document specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet
Community, and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
1917 Nesser Feb 96 An Appeal to the Internet Community to
Return Unused IP Networks (Prefixes)
to the IANA
This document is an appeal to the Internet community to return unused
address space, i.e. any block of consecutive IP prefixes, to the
Internet Assigned Numbers Authority (IANA) or any of the delegated
registries, for reapportionment. This document specifies an Internet
Best Current Practices for the Internet Community, and requests
discussion and suggestions for improvements.
1916 Berkowitz Feb 96 Enterprise Renumbering: Experience and
Information Solicitation
Because of the urgent need for, and substantial difficulty in,
renumbering IP networks, the PIER working group is compiling a series of
documents to assist sites in their renumbering efforts. The intent of
these documents is to provide both educational and practical information
to the Internet community. This memo provides information for the
Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard of
any kind.
1915 Kastenholz Feb 96 Variance for The PPP Connection Control
Protocol and The PPP Encryption Control
Protocol
The PPP Working group has developed two protocols, one to control
compression on PPP links; the Compression Control Protocol (CCP),
documented in draft-ietf-pppext-compression-04.txt. The second is the
Encryption Control Protocol (ECP), used to control encryption on serial
links, documented in draft-ietf-pppext-encryption-03.txt. This document
specifies an Internet Best Current Practices for the Internet Community,
and requests discussion and suggestions for improvements.
Elliott Informational [Page 17]
RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 January 1997
1914 Faltstrom Feb 96 How to Interact with a Whois++ Mesh
In the Whois++ architecture [Deutsch94],[Weider94], mesh traversal is
done by the client, since each server 'refers' the client to the next
appropriate server(s). [STANDARDS-TRACK]
1913 Weider Feb 96 Architecture of the Whois++ Index Service
The authors describe an architecture for indexing in distributed
databases, and apply this to the WHOIS++ protocol. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
1912 Barr Feb 96 Common DNS Operational and Configuration
Errors
This memo describes errors often found in both the operation of Domain
Name System (DNS) servers, and in the data that these DNS servers
contain. This memo provides information for the Internet community.
This memo does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.
1911 Vaudreuil Feb 96 Voice Profiule of Internet Mail
The following document is a profile of the Internet standard MIME and
ESMTP protocols for use as a digital voice networking protocol. This
memo defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
1910 Waters Feb 96 User-based Security Model for SNMPv2
In this administrative framework, a security model defines the
mechanisms used to achieve an administratively-defined level of security
for protocol interactions. Although many such security models might be
defined, it is the purpose of this document, User-based Security Model
for SNMPv2, to define the first, and, as of this writing, only, security
model for this administrative framework. This memo defines an
Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
1909 McClogherie Feb 96 An Administrative Infrastructure for
SNMPv2
It is the purpose of this document, An Administrative Infrastructure for
SNMPv2, to define an administrative framework which realizes effective
management in a variety of configurations and environments. This memo
defines an Experimental Protocol for the Internet community.
Elliott Informational [Page 18]
RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 January 1997
1908 Case Jan 96 Coexistence between Version 1 and
Version 2 of the Internet-standard
Network Management Framework
The purpose of this document is to describe coexistence between version
2 of the Internet-standard Network Management Framework [1-6], termed
the SNMP version 2 framework (SNMPv2), and the original Internet-
standard Network Management Framework (SNMPv1>. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
1907 Case Jan 96 Management Information Base for Version
2 of the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMPv2)
It is the purpose of this document to define managed objects which
describe the behavior of a SNMPv2 entity. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
1906 Case Jan 96 Transport Mappings for Version 2 of the
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
It is the purpose of this document to define how the SNMPv2 maps onto an
initial set of transport domains. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
1905 Case Jan 96 Protocol Operations for Version 2 of the
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
It is the purpose of this document, Protocol Operations for SNMPv2, to
define the operations of the protocol with respect to the sending and
receiving of the PDUs. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
1904 Case Jan 96 Conformance Statements for Version 2 of
the Simple Network Management Protocol
(SNMPv2)
It may be useful to define the acceptable lower-bounds of
implementation, along with the actual level of implementation achieved.
It is the purpose of this document to define the notation used for these
purposes. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
Elliott Informational [Page 19]
RFC 1999 Summary of 1900-1999 January 1997
1903 Case Jan 96 Textual Conventions for Version 2 of the
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
It is the purpose of this document to define the initial set of textual
conventions available to all MIB modules. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
1902 Case Jan 96 Structure of Management Information for
Version 2 of the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMPv2)
It is the purpose of this document, the Structure of Management
Information (SMI), to define that adapted subset, and to assign a set of
associated administrative values. [STANDARDS-TRACK]
1901 Case Jan 96 Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2
The purpose of this document is to define the Community-based
Administrative Framework for the SNMP version 2 framework (SNMPv2).
This document specifies an Experimental protocol for the Internet
community.
1900 Carpenter Feb 96 Renumbering Needs Work
Hosts in an IP network are identified by IP addresses, and the IP
address prefixes of subnets are advertised by routing protocols. A
change in such IP addressing information associated with a host or
subnet is known as "renumbering". This memo provides information for
the Internet community. This memo does not specify an Internet standard
of any kind.
Security Considerations
Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
Author's Address
Josh Elliott
University of Southern California
Information Sciences Institute
4676 Admiralty Way
Marina del Rey, CA 90292
Phone: (310) 822-1511
EMail: elliott@isi.edu
Elliott Informational [Page 20]
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -