rfc2605.txt

RFC 的详细文档！

                performance."

        MODULE  -- this module
            MANDATORY-GROUPS { dsEntryGroup, dsOpsGroup }

        ::= { dsCompliances 2 }

    dsIntCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
           STATUS  current
           DESCRIPTION
                   " The compliance statement  for SNMP  entities
                     which implement the DIRECTORY-SERVER-MIB for
                     monitoring Directory Server operations and the
                     interaction of the Directory Server with peer
                     Directory Servers."

           MODULE  -- this module
           MANDATORY-GROUPS { dsEntryGroup, dsIntGroup }

           ::= { dsCompliances 3 }

    dsOpsIntCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
        STATUS  current



Mansfield & Kille           Standards Track                    [Page 20]

RFC 2605            Directory Server Monitoring MIB            June 1999


        DESCRIPTION
                " The compliance statement  for SNMP  entities
                  which implement the DIRECTORY-SERVER-MIB for monitoring
                  Directory Server operations and the interaction of the
                  Directory Server with peer Directory Servers."

        MODULE  -- this module
        MANDATORY-GROUPS { dsEntryGroup, dsOpsGroup, dsIntGroup }

        ::= { dsCompliances 4 }


    -- Units of conformance

    dsEntryGroup    OBJECT-GROUP
        OBJECTS {dsServerType,            dsServerDescription,
                 dsMasterEntries,         dsCopyEntries,
                 dsCacheEntries,          dsCacheHits,
                 dsSlaveHits}
        STATUS  current
        DESCRIPTION
                " A collection of objects for a summary overview of the
                  Directory Servers."
        ::= { dsGroups 1 }

    dsOpsGroup    OBJECT-GROUP
        OBJECTS {
          dsApplIfProtocolIndex,          dsApplIfProtocol,
          dsApplIfUnauthBinds,            dsApplIfSimpleAuthBinds,
          dsApplIfStrongAuthBinds,        dsApplIfBindSecurityErrors,
          dsApplIfInOps,                  dsApplIfReadOps,
          dsApplIfCompareOps,             dsApplIfAddEntryOps,
          dsApplIfRemoveEntryOps,         dsApplIfModifyEntryOps,
          dsApplIfModifyRDNOps,           dsApplIfListOps,
          dsApplIfSearchOps,              dsApplIfOneLevelSearchOps,
          dsApplIfWholeSubtreeSearchOps,  dsApplIfReferrals,
          dsApplIfChainings,              dsApplIfSecurityErrors,
          dsApplIfErrors,                 dsApplIfReplicationUpdatesIn,
          dsApplIfReplicationUpdatesOut,  dsApplIfInBytes,
          dsApplIfOutBytes      }
        STATUS  current
        DESCRIPTION
                " A collection of objects for monitoring the Directory
                  Server operations."
        ::= { dsGroups 2 }

    dsIntGroup    OBJECT-GROUP
        OBJECTS {



Mansfield & Kille           Standards Track                    [Page 21]

RFC 2605            Directory Server Monitoring MIB            June 1999


          dsIntEntDirectoryName,         dsIntEntTimeOfCreation,
          dsIntEntTimeOfLastAttempt,     dsIntEntTimeOfLastSuccess,
          dsIntEntFailuresSinceLastSuccess, dsIntEntFailures,
          dsIntEntSuccesses,             dsIntEntURL}
        STATUS  current
        DESCRIPTION
                " A collection of objects for monitoring the Directory
                  Server's interaction with peer Directory Servers."
        ::= { dsGroups 3 }


   END

6.  Intellectual Property

   The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
   intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to
   pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
   this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
   might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it
   has made any effort to identify any such rights.  Information on the
   IETF's procedures with respect to rights in standards-track and
   standards-related documentation can be found in BCP-11.  Copies of
   claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of
   licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to
   obtain a general license or permission for the use of such
   proprietary rights by implementors or users of this specification can
   be obtained from the IETF Secretariat.

   The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
   copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
   rights which may cover technology that may be required to practice
   this standard.  Please address the information to the IETF Executive
   Director.

7.  Changes from RFC1567.

   A more general Directory model in which, several Directory protocols
   coexist, has been adopted for the purpose of the MIB design. The
   result is a generic Directory Server Monitoring MIB.

8.  Acknowledgements

   This memo is the product of discussions and deliberations carried out
   in the Mail and Directory Management Working Group (ietf-madman-wg).






Mansfield & Kille           Standards Track                    [Page 22]

RFC 2605            Directory Server Monitoring MIB            June 1999


References

   [1]  Harrington, D., Presuhn, R. and B. Wijnen, "An Architecture for
        Describing SNMP Management Frameworks", RFC 2571, April 1999.

   [2]  Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Structure and Identification of
        Management Information for TCP/IP-based Internets", STD 16, RFC
        1155, May 1990.

   [3]  Rose, M. and K. McCloghrie, "Concise MIB Definitions", STD 16,
        RFC 1212, March 1991.

   [4]  Rose, M., "A Convention for Defining Traps for use with the
        SNMP", RFC 1215, March 1991.

   [5]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,
        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Structure of Management Information
        Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.

   [6]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,
        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Textual Conventions for SMIv2", STD 58,
        RFC 2579, April 1999.

   [7]  McCloghrie, K., Perkins, D., Schoenwaelder, J., Case, J., Rose,
        M. and S. Waldbusser, "Conformance Statements for SMIv2", STD
        58, RFC 2580, April 1999.

   [8]  Case, J., Fedor, M., Schoffstall, M. and J. Davin, "Simple
        Network Management Protocol", STD 15, RFC 1157, May 1990.

   [9]  Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser,
        "Introduction to Community-based SNMPv2", RFC 1901, January
        1996.

   [10] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Transport
        Mappings for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol
        (SNMPv2)", RFC 1906, January 1996.

   [11] Case, J., Harrington D., Presuhn R. and B. Wijnen, "Message
        Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network Management
        Protocol (SNMP)", RFC 2572, April 1999.

   [12] Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model (USM)
        for version 3 of the Simple Network Management Protocol
        (SNMPv3)", RFC 2574, April 1999.






Mansfield & Kille           Standards Track                    [Page 23]

RFC 2605            Directory Server Monitoring MIB            June 1999


   [13] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M. and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol
        Operations for Version 2 of the Simple Network Management
        Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1905, January 1996.

   [14] Levi, D., Meyer, P. and B. Stewart, "SNMPv3 Applications", RFC
        2573, April 1999.

   [15] Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R. and K. McCloghrie, "View-based Access
        Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network Management Protocol
        (SNMP)", RFC 2575, April 1999.

   [16] ITU-T Rec. X.501, "The Directory: Models", 1993.

   [17] Wahl, M., Howes, T. and S. Kille, "Lightweight Directory Access
        Protocol (v3)", RFC 2251, December 1997.

   [18] Young, A., "Connection-less Lightweight X.500 Directory Access
        Protocol", RFC 1798, June 1995.

   [19] Freed N. and Kille, S., "Network Services Monitoring MIB", RFC
        2248, January 1998.

   [20] Grillo, P. and S. Waldbusser, "Host Resources MIB", RFC 1514,
        September 1993.

   [21] Wahl, W., Kille, S. and T. Howes, "Lightweight Directory Access
        Protocol (v3): UTF-8 String Representation of Distinguished
        Names", RFC 2253, December 1997.

   [22] http://www.isi.edu/in-notes/iana/assignments/protocol-numbers

Security Considerations

   There are no management objects defined in this MIB that have a MAX-
   ACCESS clause of read-write and/or read-create.  So, if this MIB is
   implemented correctly, then there is no risk that an intruder can
   alter or create any management objects of this MIB via direct SNMP
   SET operations.

   However, the information itself may partly reveal the configuration
   of the directory system and passively increase its vulnerability. The
   information could also be used to analyze network usage and traffic
   patterns.

   Therefore, it may be important in some environments to control read
   access to these objects and possibly to even encrypt the values of
   these object when sending them over the network via SNMP.  Not all
   versions of SNMP provide features for such a secure environment.



Mansfield & Kille           Standards Track                    [Page 24]

RFC 2605            Directory Server Monitoring MIB            June 1999


   SNMPv1 by itself is such an insecure environment.  Even if the
   network itself is secure (for example by using IPSec), even then,
   there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to
   access and GET (read) the objects in this MIB.

   It is recommended that the implementors consider the security
   features as provided by the SNMPv3 framework.  Specifically, the use
   of the User-based Security Model RFC 2574 [12] and the View-based
   Access Control Model RFC 2575 [15] is recommended.

   It is then a customer/user responsibility to ensure that the SNMP
   entity giving access to an instance of this MIB, is properly
   configured to give access to those objects only to those principals
   (users) that have legitimate rights to access them.

Authors' Addresses

   Glenn Mansfield
   Cyber Solutions Inc.
   6-6-3 Minami Yoshinari
   Aoba-ku, Sendai 989-3204
   Japan

   Phone: [phone]
   EMail: [e-mail]


   Steve E. Kille
   MessagingDirect Ltd.
   The Dome, The Square
   Richmond TW9 1DT
   UK

   Phone: [phone]
   EMail: [e-mail]
















Mansfield & Kille           Standards Track                    [Page 25]

RFC 2605            Directory Server Monitoring MIB            June 1999


Full Copyright Statement

   Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999).  All Rights Reserved.

   This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
   others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
   or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
   and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
   kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
   included on all such copies and derivative works.  However, this
   document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
   the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
   Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
   developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
   copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
   followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
   English.

   The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
   revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.

   This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
   "AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
   TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
   BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
   HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
   MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.

Acknowledgement

   Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
   Internet Society.



















Mansfield & Kille           Standards Track                    [Page 26]