📄 rfc3231.txt
字号:
Network Working Group D. Levi
Request for Comments: 3231 Nortel Networks
Obsoletes: 2591 J. Schoenwaelder
Category: Standards Track TU Braunschweig
January 2002
Definitions of Managed Objects for
Scheduling Management Operations
Status of this Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2002). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
In particular, it describes a set of managed objects that are used to
schedule management operations periodically or at specified dates and
times.
This document obsoletes RFC 2591.
Table of Contents
1 Introduction ................................................. 2
2 The SNMP Management Framework ................................ 2
3 Overview ..................................................... 3
3.1 Periodic Schedules ......................................... 4
3.2 Calendar Schedules ......................................... 4
3.3 One-shot Schedules ......................................... 5
3.4 Time Transitions ........................................... 5
3.5 Actions .................................................... 5
4 Definitions .................................................. 6
5 Usage Examples ............................................... 20
5.1 Starting a script to ping devices every 20 minutes ......... 20
5.2 Starting a script at the next Friday the 13th .............. 21
5.3 Turning an interface off during weekends ................... 22
Levi & Schoenwaelder Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 3231 Schedule MIB January 2002
6 Security Considerations ...................................... 23
7 Intellectual Property ........................................ 25
8 Changes from RFC 2591 ........................................ 25
9 Acknowledgments .............................................. 26
10 References .................................................. 26
11 Editors' Addresses .......................................... 28
12 Full Copyright Statement .................................... 29
1. Introduction
This memo defines a portion of the Management Information Base (MIB)
for use with network management protocols in the Internet community.
In particular, it describes a set of managed objects that are used to
schedule management operations periodically or at specified dates and
times.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].
2. The SNMP Management Framework
The SNMP Management Framework presently consists of five major
components:
o An overall architecture, described in RFC 2571 [RFC2571].
o Mechanisms for describing and naming objects and events for the
purpose of management. The first version of this Structure of
Management Information (SMI) is called SMIv1 and described in STD
16, RFC 1155 [RFC1155], STD 16, RFC 1212 [RFC1212] and RFC 1215
[RFC1215]. The second version, called SMIv2, is described in STD
58, RFC 2578 [RFC2578], STD 58, RFC 2579 [RFC2579] and STD 58, RFC
2580 [RFC2580].
o Message protocols for transferring management information. The
first version of the SNMP message protocol is called SNMPv1 and
described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [RFC1157]. A second version of the
SNMP message protocol, which is not an Internet standards track
protocol, is called SNMPv2c and described in RFC 1901 [RFC1901]
and RFC 1906 [RFC1906]. The third version of the message protocol
is called SNMPv3 and described in RFC 1906 [RFC1906], RFC 2572
[RFC2572] and RFC 2574 [RFC2574].
Levi & Schoenwaelder Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 3231 Schedule MIB January 2002
o Protocol operations for accessing management information. The
first set of protocol operations and associated PDU formats is
described in STD 15, RFC 1157 [RFC1157]. A second set of protocol
operations and associated PDU formats is described in RFC 1905
[RFC1905].
o A set of fundamental applications described in RFC 2573 [RFC2573]
and the view-based access control mechanism described in RFC 2575
[RFC2575].
A more detailed introduction to the current SNMP Management Framework
can be found in RFC 2570 [RFC2570].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. Objects in the MIB are
defined using the mechanisms defined in the SMI.
This memo specifies a MIB module that is compliant to the SMIv2. A
MIB conforming to the SMIv1 can be produced through the appropriate
translations. The resulting translated MIB must be semantically
equivalent, except where objects or events are omitted because no
translation is possible (use of Counter64). Some machine readable
information in SMIv2 will be converted into textual descriptions in
SMIv1 during the translation process. However, this loss of machine
readable information is not considered to change the semantics of the
MIB.
3. Overview
The MIB defined in this memo provides the scheduling of actions
periodically or at specified dates and times. The actions can be
used to realize on-duty / off-duty schedules or to trigger management
functions in a distributed management application.
Schedules can be enabled or disabled by modifying a control object.
This allows for pre-configured schedules which are activated or
deactivated by some other management functions.
The term `scheduler' is used throughout this memo to refer to the
entity which implements the scheduling MIB and which invokes the
actions at the specified points in time.
Levi & Schoenwaelder Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 3231 Schedule MIB January 2002
3.1. Periodic Schedules
Periodic schedules are based on fixed time periods between the
initiation of scheduled actions. Periodic schedules are defined by
specifying the number of seconds between two initiations. The time
needed to complete the action is usually not known by the scheduler
and does therefore not influence the next scheduling point.
Implementations must guarantee that action invocations will not occur
before their next scheduled time. However, implementations may be
forced to delay invocations in the face of local constraints (e.g., a
heavy load on higher-priority tasks). An accumulation of such delays
would result in a drift of the scheduling interval with respect to
time, and should be avoided.
Scheduled actions collecting statistical data should retrieve time
stamps from the data source and not rely on the accuracy of the
periodic scheduler in order to obtain accurate statistics.
3.2. Calendar Schedules
Calendar schedules trigger scheduled actions at specified days of the
week and days of the month. Calendar schedules are therefore aware
of the notion of months, days, weekdays, hours and minutes.
It is possible to specify multiple values for each calendar item.
This provides a mechanism for defining complex schedules. For
example, a schedule could be defined which triggers an action every
15 minutes on a given weekday.
Months, days and weekdays are specified using the objects schedMonth,
schedDay and schedWeekDay of type BITS. Setting multiple bits to one
in these objects causes an OR operation. For example, setting the
bits monday(1) and friday(5) in schedWeekDay restricts the schedule
to Mondays and Fridays.
The bit fields for schedMonth, schedDay and schedWeekDay are combined
using an AND operation. For example, setting the bits june(5) and
july(6) in schedMonth and combining it with the bits monday(1) and
friday(5) set in schedWeekDay will result in a schedule which is
restricted to every Monday and Friday in the months June and July.
Wildcarding of calendar items is achieved by setting all bits to one.
It is possible to define calendar schedules that will never trigger
an action. For example, one can define a calendar schedule which
should trigger an action on February 31st. Schedules like this will
simply be ignored by the scheduler.
Levi & Schoenwaelder Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 3231 Schedule MIB January 2002
Finally, calendar schedules are always expressed in local time. A
scalar, schedLocalTime, is provided so that a manager can retrieve
the notion of local time and the offset to GMT time.
3.3. One-shot Schedules
One-shot Schedules are similar to calendar schedules. The difference
between a calendar schedule and a one-shot schedule is that a one-
shot schedule will automatically disable itself once an action has
been invoked.
3.4. Time Transitions
A time transition occurs when the Schedule MIB's notion of time (as
reported by schedLocalTime) is changed so that time continuity is
lost. Time transitions may be caused by daylight savings times or
administrative changes of the system's notion of time.
There are two possible situations when a time transition occurs.
First, time may be set backwards, in which case particular times will
appear to occur twice. These are called 'ambiguous times'. Second,
time may be set forwards, in which case particular times will not
occur. These are called 'nonexistent times'.
When an action is configured in the Schedule MIB to occur at an
ambiguous time, the action will be invoked at all occurrences of the
ambiguous time. For example, if an action is scheduled to occur at
2:10 am, and a time transition occurs at 3:00 am which sets the clock
back to 2:00 am, the action will be invoked twice.
When an action is configured in the Schedule MIB to occur at a
nonexistent time, the action will not be invoked at all. For
example, if an action is scheduled to occur at 2:10 am, and a time
transition occurs at 2:00 am which sets the clock to 3:00 am, the
action will not be invoked.
3.5. Actions
Scheduled actions are modeled by SNMP set operations on local MIB
variables. Scheduled actions described in this MIB are further
restricted to objects of type INTEGER. This restriction does not
limit the usefulness of the MIB. Simple schedules such as on-duty /
off-duty schedules for resources that have a status MIB object (e.g.
ifAdminStatus) are possible.
Levi & Schoenwaelder Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 3231 Schedule MIB January 2002
More complex actions can be realized by triggering a management
script which is responsible for performing complex state transitions.
A management script can also be used to perform SNMP set operations
on remote SNMP engines.
4. Definitions
DISMAN-SCHEDULE-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE, NOTIFICATION-TYPE,
Integer32, Unsigned32, Counter32, mib-2, zeroDotZero
FROM SNMPv2-SMI
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION,
DateAndTime, RowStatus, StorageType, VariablePointer
FROM SNMPv2-TC
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF
SnmpAdminString
FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB;
schedMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "200201070000Z"
ORGANIZATION "IETF Distributed Management Working Group"
CONTACT-INFO
"WG EMail: disman@dorothy.bmc.com
Subscribe: disman-request@dorothy.bmc.com
Chair: Randy Presuhn
BMC Software, Inc.
Postal: Office 1-3141
2141 North First Street
San Jose, California 95131
USA
EMail: rpresuhn@bmc.com
Phone: +1 408 546-1006
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -