rfc1410.txt

RFC 的详细文档！

          is needed and if so by whom.  RFC Editor decides to publish or
          not.

   Of course, in all cases the RFC Editor can request or make minor
   changes for style, format, and presentation purposes.

   The IESG has designated the IESG Secretary as its agent for
   forwarding documents with IESG approval and for registering concerns
   in response to notifications (5) to the RFC Editor.  Documents from
   Area Directors or Working Group Chairs may be considered in the same
   way as documents from "other".

5.2.  The Standards Track Diagram

   There is a part of the STATUS and STATE categorization that is called
   the standards track.  Actually, only the changes of state are
   significant to the progression along the standards track, though the
   status assignments may be changed as well.

   The states illustrated by single line boxes are temporary states,
   those illustrated by double line boxes are long term states.  A
   protocol will normally be expected to remain in a temporary state for
   several months (minimum six months for proposed standard, minimum
   four months for draft standard).  A protocol may be in a long term
   state for many years.

   A protocol may enter the standards track only on the recommendation
   of the IESG and by action of the IAB; and may move from one state to
   another along the track only on the recommendation of the IESG and by
   action of the IAB.  That is, it takes both the IESG and the IAB to
   either start a protocol on the track or to move it along.

   Generally, as the protocol enters the standards track a decision is
   made as to the eventual STATUS, requirement level or applicability
   (elective, recommended, or required) the protocol will have, although
   a somewhat less stringent current status may be assigned, and it then
   is placed in the the proposed standard STATE with that status.  So
   the initial placement of a protocol is into state 1.  At any time the
   STATUS decision may be revisited.












Internet Architecture Board                                    [Page 12]

RFC 1410                     IAB Standards                    March 1993


         |
         +<----------------------------------------------+
         |                                               ^
         V    0                                          |    4
   +-----------+                                   +===========+
   |   enter   |-->----------------+-------------->|experiment |
   +-----------+                   |               +=====+=====+
                                   |                     |
                                   V    1                |
                             +-----------+               V
                             | proposed  |-------------->+
                        +--->+-----+-----+               |
                        |          |                     |
                        |          V    2                |
                        +<---+-----+-----+               V
                             | draft std |-------------->+
                        +--->+-----+-----+               |
                        |          |                     |
                        |          V    3                |
                        +<---+=====+=====+               V
                             | standard  |-------------->+
                             +=====+=====+               |
                                                         |
                                                         V    5
                                                   +=====+=====+
                                                   | historic  |
                                                   +===========+

   The transition from proposed standard (1) to draft standard (2) can
   only be by action of the IAB on the recommendation of the IESG and
   only after the protocol has been proposed standard (1) for at least
   six months.

   The transition from draft standard (2) to standard (3) can only be by
   action of the IAB on the recommendation of the IESG and only after
   the protocol has been draft standard (2) for at least four months.

   Occasionally, the decision may be that the protocol is not ready for
   standardization and will be assigned to the experimental state (4).
   This is off the standards track, and the protocol may be resubmitted
   to enter the standards track after further work.  There are other
   paths into the experimental and historic states that do not involve
   IAB action.

   Sometimes one protocol is replaced by another and thus becomes
   historic, or it may happen that a protocol on the standards track is
   in a sense overtaken by another protocol (or other events) and
   becomes historic (state 5).



Internet Architecture Board                                    [Page 13]

RFC 1410                     IAB Standards                    March 1993


6.  The Protocols

   Subsection 6.1 lists recent RFCs and other changes.  Subsections 6.2
   - 6.9 list the standards in groups by protocol state.

6.1.  Recent Changes

6.1.1.  New RFCs:

      1436 - The Internet Gopher Protocol

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1435 - IESG Advice from Experience with Path MTU Discovery

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1434 - Data Link Switching: Switch-to-Switch Protocol

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1433 - Directed ARP

             An Experimental protocol.

      1432 - Recent Internet Books

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1431 - DUA Metrics

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1430 - A Strategic Plan for Deploying an Internet X.500 Directory
             Service

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1429 - Listserv Distribute Protocol

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.



Internet Architecture Board                                    [Page 14]

RFC 1410                     IAB Standards                    March 1993


      1428 - Transition of Internet Mail from Just-Send-8 to 8bit-
             SMTP/MIME

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1427 - SMTP Service Extension for Message Size Declaration

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1426 - SMTP Service Extension for 8bit-MIMEtransport

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1425 - SMTP Service Extensions

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1424 - Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: Part IV:
             Key Certification and Related Services

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1423 - Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: Part III:
             Algorithms, Modes, and Identifiers

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1422 - Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: Part II:
             Certificate-Based Key Management

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1421 - Privacy Enhancement for Internet Electronic Mail: Part I:
             Message Encryption and Authentication Procedures

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1420 - SNMP over IPX

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1419 - SNMP over AppleTalk

             A Proposed Standard protocol.






Internet Architecture Board                                    [Page 15]

RFC 1410                     IAB Standards                    March 1993


      1418 - SNMP over OSI

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1417 - NADF Standing Documents: A Brief Overview

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1416 - Telnet Authentication Option

             An Experimental protocol.

      1415 - FTP-FTAM Gateway Specification

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1414 - Identification MIB

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1413 - Identification Protocol

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1412 - Telnet Authentication: SPX

             An Experimental protocol.

      1411 - Telnet Authentication: Kerberos Version 4

             An Experimental protocol.

      1410 - This memo.

      1409 - Telnet Authentication Option

             An Experimental protocol.

      1408 - Telnet Environment Option

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1407 - Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS3/E3 Interface
             Type

             A Proposed Standard protocol.




Internet Architecture Board                                    [Page 16]

RFC 1410                     IAB Standards                    March 1993


      1406 - Definitions of Managed Objects for the DS1 and E1 Interface
             Types

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1405 - Mapping between X.400(1984/1988) and Mail-11 (DECnet mail)

             An Experimental protocol.

      1404 - A Model for Common Operational Statistics

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1403 - BGP OSPF Interaction

             A Proposed Standard protocol.

      1402 - There's Gold in them thar Networks! or Searching for
             Treasure in all the Wrong Places

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1401 - Correspondence between the IAB and DISA on the use of DNS
             throughout the Internet

             This is an information document and does not specify any
             level of standard.

      1400 - Not yet issued.