rfc2023.txt

RFC 的详细文档！

Network Working Group                                         D. Haskin
Request for Comments: 2023                                     E. Allen
Category: Standards Track                            Bay Networks, Inc.
                                                           October 1996

                         IP Version 6 over PPP

Status of this Memo

   This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
   Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
   improvements.  Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
   Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
   and status of this protocol.  Distribution of this memo is unlimited.

Abstract

   The Point-to-Point Protocol (PPP) [1] provides a standard method of
   encapsulating Network Layer protocol information over point-to-point
   links.  PPP also defines an extensible Link Control Protocol, and
   proposes a family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for
   establishing and configuring different network-layer protocols.

   This document defines the method for transmission of IP Version 6 [2]
   packets over PPP links as well as the Network Control Protocol (NCP)
   for establishing and configuring the IPv6 over PPP. It also specifies
   the method of forming IPv6 link-local addresses on PPP links.

Table of Contents

   1.     Introduction ..........................................    2
        1.1.  Specification of Requirements ......................   2
   2.     Sending IPv6 Datagrams ................................    3
   3.     A PPP Network Control Protocol for IPv6 ...............    3
   4.     IPV6CP Configuration Options ..........................    4
        4.1.  Interface-Token ...................................    4
        4.2.  IPv6-Compression-Protocol..........................    7
   5.     Stateless Autoconfiguration and Link-Local Addresses ..    9
   A.     IPV6CP Recommended Options .............................   9
   Security Considerations .......................................  10
   References ....................................................  10
   Acknowledgments ...............................................  10
   Authors' Addresses ............................................  10








Haskin & Allen              Standards Track                     [Page 1]

RFC 2023                 IP Version 6 over PPP              October 1996


1.  Introduction

   PPP has three main components:

      1. A method for encapsulating datagrams over serial links.

      2. A Link Control Protocol (LCP) for establishing, configuring,
         and testing the data-link connection.

      3. A family of Network Control Protocols (NCPs) for establishing
         and configuring different network-layer protocols.

   In order to establish communications over a point-to-point link, each
   end of the PPP link must first send LCP packets to configure and test
   the data link.  After the link has been established and optional
   facilities have been negotiated as needed by the LCP, PPP must send
   NCP packets to choose and configure one or more network-layer
   protocols.  Once each of the chosen network-layer protocols has been
   configured,  datagrams from each network-layer protocol can be sent
   over the link.

   In this document, the NCP for establishing and configuring the IPv6
   over PPP is referred as the IPv6 Control Protocol (IPV6CP).

   The link will remain configured for communications until explicit LCP
   or NCP packets close the link down,  or until some external event
   occurs (power failure at the other end, carrier drop, etc.).

1.1.  Specification of Requirements

   In this document, several words are used to signify the requirements
   of the specification.  These words are often capitalized.

   MUST      This word, or the adjective "required", means that the
             definition is an absolute requirement of the specification.

   MUST NOT  This phrase means that the definition is an absolute
             prohibition of the specification.

   SHOULD    This word, or the adjective "recommended", means that there
             may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to
             ignore this item, but the full implications must be
             understood and carefully weighed before choosing a
             different course.

   MAY       This word, or the adjective "optional", means that this
             item is one of an allowed set of alternatives.  An
             implementation which does not include this option MUST be



Haskin & Allen              Standards Track                     [Page 2]

RFC 2023                 IP Version 6 over PPP              October 1996


             prepared to inter-operate with another implementation which
             does include the option.

2. Sending IPv6 Datagrams

   Before any IPv6 packets may be communicated, PPP must reach the
   Network-Layer Protocol phase, and the IPv6 Control Protocol must
   reach the Opened state.

   Exactly one IPv6 packet is encapsulated in the Information field of
   PPP Data Link Layer frames where the Protocol field indicates type
   hex 0057 (Internet Protocol Version 6).

   The maximum length of an IPv6 packet transmitted over a PPP link is
   the same as the maximum length of the Information field of a PPP data
   link layer frame.  PPP links supporting IPv6 must allow at least 576
   octets in the information field of a data link layer frame.

3. A PPP Network Control Protocol for IPv6

   The IPv6 Control Protocol (IPV6CP) is responsible for configuring,
   enabling, and disabling the IPv6 protocol modules on both ends of the
   point-to-point link.  IPV6CP uses the same packet exchange mechanism
   as the Link Control Protocol (LCP).  IPV6CP packets may not be
   exchanged until PPP has reached the Network-Layer Protocol phase.
   IPV6CP packets received before this phase is reached should be
   silently discarded.

   The IPv6 Control Protocol is exactly the same as the Link Control
   Protocol [1] with the following exceptions:

   Data Link Layer Protocol Field

     Exactly one IPV6CP packet is encapsulated in the Information field
     of PPP Data Link Layer frames where the Protocol field indicates
     type hex 8057 (IPv6 Control Protocol).

   Code field

     Only Codes 1 through 7 (Configure-Request, Configure-Ack,
     Configure-Nak, Configure-Reject, Terminate-Request, Terminate-Ack
     and Code-Reject) are used.  Other Codes should be treated as
     unrecognized and should result in Code-Rejects.








Haskin & Allen              Standards Track                     [Page 3]

RFC 2023                 IP Version 6 over PPP              October 1996


   Timeouts

   IPV6CP packets may not be exchanged until PPP has reached the
   Network-Layer Protocol phase.  An implementation should be prepared
   to wait for Authentication and Link Quality Determination to finish
   before timing out waiting for a Configure-Ack or other response.  It
   is suggested that an implementation give up only after user
   intervention or a configurable amount of time.

   Configuration Option Types

     IPV6CP has a distinct set of Configuration Options, which are
     defined below.

4.  IPV6CP Configuration Options

   IPV6CP Configuration Options allow negotiation of desirable IPv6
   parameters.  IPV6CP uses the same Configuration Option format defined
   for LCP [1], with a separate set of Options.  If a Configuration
   Option is not included in a Configure-Request packet,  the default
   value for that Configuration Option is assumed.

   Up-to-date values of the IPV6CP Option Type field are specified in
   the most recent "Assigned Numbers" RFC [5].  Current values are
   assigned as follows:

    1       Interface-Token
    2       IPv6-Compression-Protocol


4.1.  Interface-Token

   Description

      This Configuration Option provides a way to negotiate a unique
      32-bit interface token to be used for the address
      autoconfiguration [3] at the local end of the link (see section
      5).  The interface token MUST be unique within the PPP link; i.e.
      upon completion of the negotiation different Interface-Token
      values are to be selected for the ends of the PPP link.

      Before this Configuration Option is requested, an implementation
      must choose its tentative Interface-Token.  It is recommended that
      a non-zero value be chosen in the most random manner possible in
      order to guarantee with very high probability that an
      implementation will arrive at a unique token value.  A good way to
      choose a unique random number is to start with a unique seed.
      Suggested sources of uniqueness include machine serial numbers,



Haskin & Allen              Standards Track                     [Page 4]

RFC 2023                 IP Version 6 over PPP              October 1996


      other network hardware addresses, system clocks, etc. Note that it
      may not be sufficient to use a link-layer address alone as the
      seed, since it will not always be unique.  Thus it is suggested
      that the seed should be calculated from a variety of sources that
      are likely to be different even on identical systems and as many
      sources as possible be used simultaneously.  Good sources of
      uniqueness or randomness are required for the Interface-Token
      negotiation to succeed.  If a good source of randomness cannot be
      found,  it is recommended that a zero value be used for the
      Interface-Token transmitted in the Configure-Request.  In this
      case the PPP peer may provide a valid non-zero Interface-Token in
      its response as described below.  Note that if at least one of the
      PPP peers is able to generate a unique random number, the token
      negotiation will succeed.

      When a Configure-Request is received with the Interface-Token
      Configuration Option and the receiving peer implements this
      option, the received Interface-Token is compared with the
      Interface-Token of the last Configure-Request sent to the peer.
      Depending on the result of the comparison an implementation MUST
      respond in one of the following ways:

      If the two Interface-Tokens are different but the received
      Interface-Token is zero, a Configure-Ack is sent with a non-zero
      Interface-Token value suggested for use by the remote peer.  Such
      a suggested Interface-Token MUST be different from the Interface-
      Token of the last Configure-Request sent to the peer.

      If the two Interface-Tokens are different and the received
      Interface-Token is not zero, the Interface-Token MUST be
      acknowledged, i.e. a Configure-Ack is sent with the requested
      Interface-Token, meaning that the responding peer agrees with the
      Interface-Token requested.

      If the two Interface-Tokens are equal and are not zero, a
      Configure-Nak MUST be sent specifying a different non-zero
      Interface-Token value suggested for use by the remote peer.

      If the two Interface-Tokens are equal to zero,  the Interface-
      Tokens negotiation MUST be terminated by transmitting the
      Configure-Reject with the Interface-Token value set to zero. In
      this case a unique Interface-Token can not be negotiated.

      If a Configure-Request is received with the Interface-Token
      Configuration Option and the receiving peer does not implement
      this option, Configure-Rej is sent.





Haskin & Allen              Standards Track                     [Page 5]