rfc1000.txt

RFC 的详细文档！

               Who Talks TCP?
         787 - Connectionless Data Transmission Survey/Tutorial
         703, 702, 701, 679, 669 - Survey of New-Protocol Telnet Servers
         565 - Storing Network Survey Data at the Datacomputer
         545 - Of What Quality be the UCSB Resource Evaluators?
         530 - A Report on the SURVEY Project
         523 - SURVEY is in Operation Again
         519 - Resource Evaluation


Reynolds & Postel                                              [Page 22]



RFC 1000 - Request for Comments Reference Guide              August 1987


         514 - Network Make-Work
         464 - Resource Notebook Framework
         460 - NCP Survey
         459 - Network Questionnaire
         450 - Multics Sampling Timeout Change
         446 - Proposal to Consider a Network Program Resource Notebook
         096 - An Interactive Network Experiment to Study Modes of
               Access to the Network Information Center
         090 - CCN as a Network Service Center
         081 - Request for Reference Information
         078 - NCP Status Report: UCSB/Rand

      8c.  Statistics

         996 - Statistics Server
         618 - A Few Observations on NCP Statistics
         612, 601, 586, 579, 566, 556, 538, 522, 509, 497, 482, 455,
               443, 422, 413, 400, 391, 378 - Traffic Statistics
         603, 597, 376, 370, 367, 366, 362, 352, 344, 342, 332, 330,
               326, 319, 315, 306, 298, 293, 288, 287, 267, 266 -
               Network Host Status
         550 - NIC NCP Experiment
         388 - NCP Statistics
         255, 252, 240, 235 - Site Status

   9.  Network Experience and Demonstrations

      9a.  General

         968 - 'Twas the Night Before Start-up
         967 - All Victims Together
         573 - Data and File Transfer - Some Measurement Results
         527 - ARPAWOCKY
         525 - MIT-Mathlab Meets UCSB-OLS
         439 - PARRY Encounters the Doctor
         420 - CCA ICC Weather Demo
         372 - Notes on a Conversation with Bob Kahn on the ICCC
         364 - Serving Remote Users on the ARPANET
         302 - Excercising the ARPANET
         231 - Service Center Standards for Remote Usage - A User's View
         227 - Data Transfer Rates (RAND/UCLA)
         113 - Network Activity Report: UCSB and Rand
         089 - Some Historic Moments in Networking
         004 - Network Timetable







Reynolds & Postel                                              [Page 23]



RFC 1000 - Request for Comments Reference Guide              August 1987


   10. Site Documentation

      10a.  General

         30, 27, 24, 16, 10, 3 - Documentation Conventions

   11. Other Standards

      11a.  ANSI

         570 - Experimental Input Mapping Between NVT ASCII and UCSB
               Online System
         183 - The EBCDIC Codes and Their Mapping to ASCII
         020 - ASCII Format for Network Interchange

      11b.  CCITT

         987 - Mapping Between X.400 and RFC 822
         874 - A Critique of X.25

      11c.  NRC

         942 - Transport Protocols for Department of Defense Data
               Networks
         939 - Executive Summary of the NRC Report on Transport
               Protocols for Department of Defense Data Networks

      11d.  ISO

         995 - End System to Intermediate System Routing Exchange
               Protocol for Use in Conjunction with ISO 8473
         994 - Final Text of DIS 8473, Protocol for Providing the
               Connectionless Mode Network Service
         982 - Guidelines for the Specification of the Structure of the
               Domain Specific Part (DSP) of the ISO Standard NSAP
               Address
         941 - Addendum to the Network Service Definition Covering
               Network Layer Addressing
         926 - Protocol for Providing the Connectionless-Mode Network
               Services
         905 - ISO Transport Protocol Specification (ISO DP 8073)
         892 - ISO Transport Protocol
         873 - The Illusion of Vendor Support








Reynolds & Postel                                              [Page 24]



RFC 1000 - Request for Comments Reference Guide              August 1987


   12. Never Issued

      12a.  Never Issued

         014, 026, 092, 159, 201, 220, 244, 248, 257, 258, 259, 260,
         261, 262, 272, 275, 277, 279, 284, 337, 341, 358, 375, 380,
         383, 397, 424, 427, 428, 444, 465, 481, 484, 502, 507, 517,
         536, 540, 541, 554, 558, 564, 572, 575, 583, 605, 639, 641,
         646, 648, 649, 650, 664, 665, 668, 670, 673, 676, 682, 693,
         709, 710, 711, 715, 723, 853.









































Reynolds & Postel                                              [Page 25]



RFC 1000 - Request for Comments Reference Guide              August 1987


REQUEST FOR COMMENTS LIST WITH ABSTRACTS

   RFC     Author       Date        Title
   ---     ------       ----        -----

   999     Westine      Mar 87      Requests For Comments Summary

      A summary of the Request for Comments Documents from RFC 900-999.

   998     Lambert      Mar 87      NETBLT:  A Bulk Data Transfer
                                    Protocol

      This document is a description of and a specification for the
      NETBLT protocol.  It is a revision of the specification published
      in RFC-969.  NETBLT (NETwork BLock Transfer) is a transport level
      protocol intended for the rapid transfer of a large quantity of
      data between computers.  It provides a transfer that is reliable
      and flow controlled, and is designed to provide maximum throughput
      over a wide variety of networks.  Although NETBLT currently runs
      on top of the Internet Protocol (IP), it should be able to operate
      on top of any datagram protocol similar in function to IP.

      This document is published for discussion and comment, and does
      not constitute a standard.  The proposal may change and certain
      parts of the protocol have not yet been specified; implementation
      of this document is therefore not advised.

   997     Reynolds     Mar 87      Internet Numbers

      This memo is an official status report on the network numbers used
      in the Internet community.  As of 1-Mar-87 the Network Information
      Center (NIC) at SRI International has assumed responsibility for
      assignment of Network Numbers and Autonomous System Numbers.  This
      RFC documents the current assignments of these numbers at the time
      of this transfer of responsibility.

   996     Mills        Feb 87      Statistics Server

      This RFC specifies a standard for the ARPA Internet community.
      Hosts and gateways on the DARPA Internet that choose to implement
      a remote statistics monitoring facility may use this protocol to
      send statistics data upon request to a monitoring center or
      debugging host.

   995     ANSI         Apr 86      End System to Intermediate System
                                    Routing Exchange Protocol for use in
                                    conjunction with ISO 8473.

      This Protocol is one of a set of International Standards produced


Reynolds & Postel                                              [Page 26]



RFC 1000 - Request for Comments Reference Guide              August 1987


      to facilitate the interconnection of open systems.  The set of
      standards covers the services and protocols required to achieve
      such interconnection.

      This Protocol is positioned with respect to other related
      standards by the layers defined in the Reference Model for Open
      Systems Interconnection (ISO 7498) and by the structure defined in
      the Internal Organization of the Network Layer (DIS 8648).  In
      particular, it is a protocol of the Network Layer.  This Protocol
      permits End Systems and Intermediate Systems to exchange
      configuration and routing information to facilitate the operation
      of the routing and relaying functions of the Network Layer.

   994     ANSI         Mar 86      Final Text of DIS 8473, Protocol for
                                    Providing the Connectionless Mode
                                    Network Service

      This Protocol Standard is one of a set of International Standards
      produced to facilitate the interconnection of open systems.  The
      set of standards covers the services and protocols required to
      achieve such interconnection.

      This Protocol Standard is positioned with respect to other related
      standards by the layers defined in the Reference Model for Open
      Systems Interconnection (ISO 7498).  In particular, it is a
      protocol of the Network Layer.  This Protocol may be used between
      network-entities in end systems or in Network Layer relay systems
      (or both).  It provides the Connectionless-mode Network Service as
      defined in Addendum 1 to the Network Service Definition Covering
      Connectionless-mode Transmission (ISO 8348/AD1).

   993     Clark        Dec 86      PCMAIL:  A Distributed Mail System
                                    for Personal Computers

      This document is a discussion of the PCMAIL workstation-based
      distributed mail system.  It is a revision of the design published
      in NIC RFC 984.  The revision is based on discussion and comments
      from a variety of sources, as well as further research into the
      design of interactive PCMAIL clients and the use of client code on
      machines other than IBM PCs.  As this design may change,
      implementation of this document is not advised.

   992     Birman       Nov 86      On Communication Support for
                                    Fault-Tolerant Process Groups

      This memo describes a collection of multicast communication
      primitives integrated with a mechanism for handling process
      failure and recovery.  These primitives facilitate the
      implementation of fault-tolerant process groups, which can be used


Reynolds & Postel                                              [Page 27]



RFC 1000 - Request for Comments Reference Guide              August 1987


      to provide distributed services in an environment subject to
      non-malicious crash failures.

      Here, we argue that the form of "best effort" reliability provided
      by host groups may not address the requirements of those
      researchers who are building fault tolerant software.  Our basic
      premise is that reliable handling of failures, recoveries, and
      dynam