📄 rfc2283.txt
字号:
exchanges). Moreover, in IBGP exchanges such a message must also
carry the LOCAL_PREF attribute. If such a message is received from an
external peer, the local system shall check whether the leftmost AS
in the AS_PATH attribute is equal to the autonomous system number of
the peer than sent the message. If that is not the case, the local
system shall send the NOTIFICATION message with Error Code UPDATE
Message Error, and the Error Subcode set to Malformed AS_PATH.
5. Multiprotocol Unreachable NLRI - MP_UNREACH_NLRI (Type Code 15):
This is an optional non-transitive attribute that can be used for the
purpose of withdrawing multiple unfeasible routes from service.
The attribute contains one or more triples <Address Family
Information, Unfeasible Routes Length, Withdrawn Routes>, where each
triple is encoded as shown below:
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Address Family Identifier (2 octets) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Subsequent Address Family Identifier (1 octet) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
| Withdrawn Routes (variable) |
+---------------------------------------------------------+
Bates, et. al. Standards Track [Page 5]
RFC 2283 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 February 1998
The use and the meaning of these fields are as follows:
Address Family Identifier:
This field carries the identity of the Network Layer protocol
associated with the NLRI that follows. Presently defined values
for this field are specified in RFC1700 (see the Address Family
Numbers section).
Subsequent Address Family Identifier:
This field provides additional information about the type of
the Network Layer Reachability Information carried in the
attribute.
Withdrawn Routes:
A variable length field that lists NLRI for the routes that are
being withdrawn from service. When the Subsequent Address
Family Identifier field is set to one of the values defined in
this document, each NLRI is encoded as specified in the "NLRI
encoding" section of this document.
An UPDATE message that contains the MP_UNREACH_NLRI is not required
to carry any other path attributes.
6. NLRI encoding
The Network Layer Reachability information is encoded as one or more
2-tuples of the form <length, prefix>, whose fields are described
below:
+---------------------------+
| Length (1 octet) |
+---------------------------+
| Prefix (variable) |
+---------------------------+
The use and the meaning of these fields are as follows:
a) Length:
The Length field indicates the length in bits of the address
prefix. A length of zero indicates a prefix that matches all
(as specified by the address family) addresses (with prefix,
itself, of zero octets).
Bates, et. al. Standards Track [Page 6]
RFC 2283 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 February 1998
b) Prefix:
The Prefix field contains address prefixes followed by enough
trailing bits to make the end of the field fall on an octet
boundary. Note that the value of trailing bits is irrelevant.
7. Subsequent Address Family Identifier
This document defines the following values for the Subsequent Address
Family Identifier field carried in the MP_REACH_NLRI and
MP_UNREACH_NLRI attributes:
1 - Network Layer Reachability Information used for unicast
forwarding
2 - Network Layer Reachability Information used for multicast
forwarding
3 - Network Layer Reachability Information used for both unicast
and multicast forwarding
This document reserves values 128-255 for vendor-specific
applications.
This document reserves value 0.
Subsequent Address Family Identifiers (other than those reserved for
vendor specific use) are assigned only by the IETF consensus process
and IESG approval.
8. Security Considerations
This extension to BGP does not change the underlying security issues.
9. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank members of the IDR Working Group for
their review and comments.
Bates, et. al. Standards Track [Page 7]
RFC 2283 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 February 1998
10. References
[BGP-4] Rekhter, Y., and T. Li, "A Border Gateway Protocol 4
(BGP-4)", RFC 1771, March 1995.
[IPv4] Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791,
September 1981.
[RFC1700] Reynolds, J., and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers," STD 2,
RFC 1700, October 1994. (see also
http://www.iana.org/iana/assignments.html)
11. Author Information
Tony Bates
Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134
EMail: tbates@cisco.com
Ravi Chandra
Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134
EMail: rchandra@cisco.com
Dave Katz
Juniper Networks, Inc.
3260 Jay St.
Santa Clara, CA 95054
EMail: dkatz@jnx.com
Yakov Rekhter
Cisco Systems, Inc.
170 West Tasman Drive
San Jose, CA 95134
EMail: yakov@cisco.com
Bates, et. al. Standards Track [Page 8]
RFC 2283 Multiprotocol Extensions for BGP-4 February 1998
12. Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1998). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Bates, et. al. Standards Track [Page 9]
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码
Ctrl + C
搜索代码
Ctrl + F
全屏模式
F11
切换主题
Ctrl + Shift + D
显示快捷键
?
增大字号
Ctrl + =
减小字号
Ctrl + -