tcpip.sgml

ecos实时嵌入式操作系统

</SECT1>
<SECT1 id="net-common-performance-test">
<TITLE>Performance Test</TITLE>
<PROGRAMLISTING><EMPHASIS>tcp_echo</EMPHASIS>      - data forwarding program for performance test</PROGRAMLISTING>
<PARA><command>tcp_echo</command> is one
part of the standard performance test we use.  The other parts are
host programs <LITERAL>tcp_source</LITERAL> and <LITERAL>tcp_sink</LITERAL>.
 To make these (under LINUX) cd to the tests source directory in
the eCos repository and type &ldquo;<LITERAL>make -f make.linux</LITERAL>&rdquo; -
this should build <LITERAL>tcp_source</LITERAL> and <LITERAL>tcp_sink</LITERAL>.</PARA>
<PARA>The LINUX program &ldquo;<LITERAL>tcp_source</LITERAL>&rdquo; sends
data to the target.  On the target, &ldquo;<LITERAL>tcp_echo</LITERAL>&rdquo; sends
it onwards to &ldquo;<LITERAL>tcp_sink</LITERAL>&rdquo; running
on LINUX.  So the target must receive and send on all the data that <LITERAL>tcp_source</LITERAL> sends
it; the time taken for this is measured and the data rate is calculated.</PARA>
<PARA>To invoke the test, first start <LITERAL>tcp_echo</LITERAL> on
the target board and wait for it to become quiescent - it will report
work to calibrate a CPU load which can be used to simulate real
operating conditions for the stack.</PARA>
<PARA>Then on your LINUX machine, in one terminal window, invoke <LITERAL>tcp_sink</LITERAL> giving
it the IP address (or hostname) of one interface of the target board.
 For example &ldquo;<LITERAL>tcp_sink 10.130.39.66</LITERAL>&rdquo;.
 <LITERAL>tcp_echo</LITERAL> on the target
will print something like &ldquo;<LITERAL>SINK connection
from 10.130.39.13:1143</LITERAL>&rdquo; when <LITERAL>tcp_sink</LITERAL> is
correctly invoked.</PARA>
<PARA>Next, in another LINUX terminal window, invoke <LITERAL>tcp_source</LITERAL>,
giving it the IP address (or hostname) of an interface of the target
board, and optionally a background load to apply to the target while
the test runs.  For example, &ldquo;<LITERAL>tcp_source
194.130.39.66</LITERAL>&rdquo; to run the test with no
additional target CPU load, or &ldquo;<LITERAL>tcp_source
194.130.39.66 85</LITERAL>&rdquo; to load it up to 85% used.
 The target load must be a multiple of 5.  <LITERAL>tcp_echo</LITERAL> on
the target will print something like &ldquo;<LITERAL>SOURCE
connection from 194.130.39.13:1144</LITERAL>&rdquo; when
tcp_source is correctly invoked.</PARA>
<PARA>You can connect tcp_sink to one target interface
and tcp_source to another, or both to the same interface.
 Similarly, you can run <LITERAL>tcp_sink</LITERAL> and <LITERAL>tcp_source</LITERAL> on
the same LINUX machine or different ones.  TCP/IP and ARP
look after them finding one another, as intended.</PARA>
<PROGRAMLISTING><EMPHASIS>nc_test_master</EMPHASIS> - network characterization master
<EMPHASIS>nc_test_slave</EMPHASIS> - network characterization slave</PROGRAMLISTING>
<PARA>These tests talk to each other to measure network performance.
They can each run on either a test target or a LINUX host computer
given some customization to your local environment. As provided, <literal>nc_test_slave</literal> must
run on the test target, and <literal>nc_test_master</literal> must
be run on a LINUX host, and be given the test target's
IP address or hostname.</PARA>
<PARA>The tests print network performance for various packet sizes
over UDP and TCP, versus various additional CPU loads on the target.</PARA>
<PARA>
The programs <PROGRAMLISTING><EMPHASIS>nc6_test_slave</EMPHASIS>
<EMPHASIS>nc6_test_master</EMPHASIS></PROGRAMLISTING>
are additional forms which support both IPv4 and IPv6 addressing.
</PARA>
</SECT1>
<SECT1 id="net-common-interactive-tests">
<TITLE>Interactive Tests</TITLE>
<PROGRAMLISTING><EMPHASIS>server_test</EMPHASIS> - a very simple server example</PROGRAMLISTING>
<PARA>This test simply awaits a connection on port 7734 and after
accepting a connection, gets a packet (with a timeout of a few seconds)
and prints it. </PARA>
<PARA>The connection is then closed. We then loop to await the next
connection, and so on. To use it, telnet to the target on port 7734
then type something (quickly!)</PARA>
<screen>% telnet 172.16.19.171 7734 
Hello target board</screen>
<PARA>and the test program will print something like:</PARA>
<screen>connection from 172.16.19.13:3369 
buf = "Hello target board"</screen>

<PROGRAMLISTING><EMPHASIS>ga_server_test</EMPHASIS> - another very simple server example</PROGRAMLISTING>
<PARA>This is a variation on the <EMPHASIS>ga_server_test</EMPHASIS> test
with the difference being that it uses the <FUNCTION>getaddrinfo</FUNCTION>
function to set up its addresses.  On a system with IPv6 enabled, it will
listen on port 7734 for a TCP connection via either IPv4 or IPv6.
</PARA>

<PROGRAMLISTING><EMPHASIS>tftp_client_test</EMPHASIS> - performs a tftp get and put from/to &ldquo;server&rdquo;</PROGRAMLISTING>
<PARA>This is only partially interactive.  You need to set things
up on the &ldquo;server&rdquo; in order for this to work,
and you will need to look at the server afterwards to confirm that all
was well.</PARA>
<PARA>For each interface in turn, this test attempts to read by
tftp from the server, a file called
<filename>tftp_get</filename>
and
prints the status and contents it read (if any).  It then writes
the same data to a file called
<filename>tftp_put</filename>
on
the same server.</PARA>
<PARA>In order for this to succeed, both files must already exist.
 The TFTP protocol does not require that a WRQ request _create_ a
file, just that it can write it.  The TFTP server on Linux certainly
will only allow writes to an existing file, given the appropriate
permission.  Thus, you need to have these files in place, with proper permission,
before running the test.</PARA>
<PARA>The conventional place for the tftp server to operate in LINUX
is /tftpboot/; you will likely need root privileges
to create files there. The data contents of
<filename>tftp_get</filename>
can
be anything you like, but anything very large will waste lots of
time printing it on the test&rsquo;s stdout, and anything above
32kB will cause a buffer overflow and unpredictable failure.</PARA>
<PARA>Creating an empty tftp_put file (eg. by copying /dev/null
to it) is neatest.  So before the test you should have something
like:</PARA>
<PROGRAMLISTING>-rw-rw-rw- 1 root        1076 May  1 11:39 tftp_get
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root        0 May  1 15:52 tftp_put </PROGRAMLISTING>
<PARA>note that both files have public permissions wide open.  After
running the test,
<filename>tftp_put</filename>
should
be a copy of
<filename>tftp_get</filename>.</PARA>
<PROGRAMLISTING>-rw-rw-rw-  1 root       1076 May  1 11:39 tftp_get
-rw-rw-rw-  1 root       1076 May  1 15:52 tftp_put

</PROGRAMLISTING>
<PROGRAMLISTING><EMPHASIS>tftp_server_test</EMPHASIS> - runs a tftp server for a short while</PROGRAMLISTING>
<PARA>This test is truly interactive, in that you can use a standard
tftp application to get and put files from the server, during the
5 minutes that it runs.  The dummy filesystem which underlies the
server initially contains one file, called &ldquo;uu&rdquo; which contains
part of a familiar text and some padding.  It also accommodates
creation of 3 further files of up to 1Mb in size and names of up
to 256 bytes.  Exceeding these limits will cause a buffer overflow
and unpredictable failure.</PARA>
<PARA>The dummy filesystem is an implementation of the generic API
which allows a true filesystem to be attached to the tftp server
in the network stack.</PARA>
<PARA>We have been testing the tftp server by running the test on
the target board, then using two different host computers connecting
to the different target interfaces, putting a file from each, getting
the &ldquo;uu&rdquo; file, and getting the file from the other computer.
 This verifies that data is preserved during the transfer as well
as interworking with standard tftp applications.</PARA>
</SECT1>
<SECT1 id="net-common-maintenance-tools">
<TITLE>Maintenance Tools </TITLE>
<PROGRAMLISTING><EMPHASIS>set_mac_address</EMPHASIS> - set MAC address(es) of interfaces in NVRAM</PROGRAMLISTING>
<PARA>This program makes an example <function>ioctl()</function> call
<acronym>SIOCSIFHWADDR</acronym> 
&ldquo;Socket IO Set InterFace HardWare ADDRess&rdquo;
to set the MAC address on targets
where this is supported and enabled in the configuration. You must
edit the source to choose a MAC address and further edit it to allow
this very dangerous operation. Not all ethernet drivers support
this operation, because most ethernet hardware does not support
it &mdash; or it comes pre-set from the factory.
<emphasis>Do not use this program.</emphasis></PARA>
</SECT1>
</CHAPTER>
<CHAPTER id="net-common-support">
<title>Support Features</title>
<SECT1 id="net-common-tftp">
<TITLE>TFTP</TITLE>
<PARA>The TFTP client and server are described in
<filename>tftp_support.h</filename>;
the client API is simple and can be easily understood by reading
<filename>tftp_client_test.c</filename>.</PARA>
<PARA>The server is more complex.  It requires a filesystem implementation
to be supplied by the user, and attached to the tftp server by means
of a vector of function pointers:</PARA>
<PROGRAMLISTING>struct tftpd_fileops {
             int (&ast;open)(const char &ast;, int);
             int (&ast;close)(int);
             int (&ast;write)(int, const void &ast;, int);
             int (&ast;read)(int, void &ast;, int);
};</PROGRAMLISTING>
<PARA>These functions have the obvious semantics.  The structure
describing the filesystem is an argument to the <function>tftpd_start(int,
struct tftpd_fileops &ast;);</function> call.
 The first argument is the port to use for the server.</PARA>
<PARA>As discussed in the description of the tftp_server_test
above, an example filesystem is provided in
<filename>net/common/<REPLACEABLE>VERSION</REPLACEABLE>/src/tftp_dummy_file.c</filename>
for
use by the tftp server test.  The dummy filesystem is not a supported
part of the network stack, it exists purely for demonstration purposes.</PARA>
</SECT1>
<SECT1 id="net-common-dhcp">
<TITLE>DHCP</TITLE>
<PARA>This API publishes a routine to maintain DHCP state, and a
semaphore that is signalled when a lease requires attention: this
is your clue to call the aforementioned routine.</PARA>
<PARA>The intent with this API is that a simple DHCP client thread,
which maintains the state of the interfaces, can go as follows:
(after <function>init_all_network_interfaces()</function> is
called from elsewhere)</PARA>
<PROGRAMLISTING>while ( 1 ) {
        while ( 1 ) {
            cyg_semaphore_wait( &amp;dhcp_needs_attention );
            if ( ! dhcp_bind() ) // a lease expired
                break; // If we need to re-bind
        }
        dhcp_halt(); // tear everything down
        init_all_network_interfaces(); // re-initialize
}</PROGRAMLISTING>
<PARA>and if the application does not want to suffer the overhead
of a separate thread and its stack for this, this functionality
can be placed in the app&rsquo;s server loop in an obvious fashion.
 That is the goal of breaking out these internal elements.  For example,
some server might be arranged to poll DHCP from time to time like
this:</PARA>
<PROGRAMLISTING>while ( 1 ) {
    init_all_network_interfaces();
    open-my-listen-sockets();
    while ( 1 ) {
       serve-one-request();
       // sleeps if no connections, but not forever; 
       // so this loop is polled a few times a minute...
       if ( cyg_semaphore_trywait( &amp;dhcp_needs_attention )) {
             if ( ! dhcp_bind() ) {
                 close-my-listen-sockets();
                 dhcp_halt();
                 break;
             }
       }
    }
}</PROGRAMLISTING>
<PARA>If the configuration option CYGOPT_NET_DHCP_DHCP_THREAD
is defined, then eCos provides a thread as described initially.
Independent of this option, initialization of the interfaces still
occurs in <function>init_all_network_interfaces()</function> and
your startup code can call that.  It will start the DHCP management
thread if configured.  If a lease fails to be renewed, the management
thread will shut down all interfaces and attempt to initialize all
the interfaces again from scratch.  This may cause chaos in the
app, which is why managing the DHCP state in an application aware
thread is actually better, just far less convenient for testing.</PARA>
</SECT1>
</CHAPTER>
    &net-common-tcpip-manpages-sgml;
</PART>