idctmm32.cpp
来自「这是一组DCT和iDCT的代码」· C++ 代码 · 共 1,707 行 · 第 1/4 页
CPP
1,707 行
#include "StdAfx.h"
#pragma warning(once:4305 4244)
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// not functional
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
// MPEG2AVI
// --------
// v0.16B34
// performance optimization, idct_mmx32_rows() and idct_mmx32_cols() now
// transpose their respective outputs "in-place" (saves a bit of time)
//
// v0.16B33 initial release
//
// MMX32 iDCT algorithm (IEEE-1180 compliant) :: idct_mmx32()
//
// This IDCT implementation is based on Intel Application Note AP-922.
//
// This file implements the idct algorithm with no transpose.
// The other file (idctmm32_transpose.c) is faster, but transposes the
// output-matrix. (Intel's code-listing produces a transposed output.)
//
// ALGORITHM OVERVIEW
// ------------------
// This was one of the harder pieces of work to code.
// Intel's app-note focuses on the numerical theory/issues of the IDCT
// implementation, but assumes the programmer is familiar with the
// requisite mathematics, leaving the exact form of the complete IDCT
// code-listing up to the programmer's imagination.
//
// I played around with Intel's code-fragments for quite a few hours.
// This file is *A* working IDCT implementation, but it may not be
// the implementation Intel originally intended. Rest assured, I've
// done everything in my power to guarantee its correctness.
// This implementation passes all six IEEE accuracy tests by a fair margin.
//
// My IDCT algorithm consists of 4 steps:
//
// 1) IDCT-row transformation (using the IDCT-row function) on all 8 rows
// This yields an intermediate 8x8 matrix.
//
// 2) transpose of intermediate matrix (mandatory)
//
// 3) IDCT-row transformation (2nd time) on all 8 rows of the
// intermediate matrix.
// At this point, we have the final-result, in transposed form.
//
// 4) post-transformation matrix transpose
// (not necessary if the input-data is already transposed, this could
// be done during the MPEG "zig-zag" scan, but since my algorithm
// requires at least one transpose operation, why not re-use the
// transpose-code.)
//
// Although the (1st) and (3rd) steps use the same basic row-transform
// operation, the (3rd) step uses different shift&round constants
// (explained later.)
//
// Also note that the intermediate transpose (2) would not be neccessary,
// if the subsequent operation were a iDCT-column transformation. Since
// we only have the iDCT-row transform, we transpose the intermediate
// matrix and use the iDCT-row transform a 2nd time. I suppose one
// a faster (but more complicated) code-implementation is possible,
// if these steps were merged.
//
// I had to change some constants/variables for my method to work :
//
// As given by Intel, #SHIFT_INV_COL and #RND_INV_COL are wrong.
// Not surprising since I'm probably implementing the IDCT in
// perverse fashion.
// round_inv_col[], which is given as "4 short" values, should have the
// same dimensions as round_inv_row[]. The corrected variables are
// shown.
//
// Intel's code defines 4 tables of constants. My code only uses only
// one of these tables, row#0.
//
// IMPLEMENTATION DETAILs
// ----------------------
//
// I divided the 4-steps of my algorithm into two subroutines,
// 1) idct_mmx32_rows() - transforms 8 rows, then transpose
// 2) idct_mmx32_cols() - transforms 8 rows, then transpose
// yields final result ("drop-in" direct replacement for INT32 IDCT)
//
// idct_mmx32_cols() is a carbon-copy of idct_mmx32_rows(), i.e. both
// execute a row-by-row transformations. Only the shift&rounding
// coefficients differ.
//
// In the 1st function (rows), the shift & round instructions use
// SHIFT_INV_ROW & round_inv_row[] (renamed to r_inv_row[])
//
// In the 2nd function (cols)-> r_inv_col[], and
// SHIFT_INV_COL & round_inv_col[] (renamed to r_inv_col[])
//
// Each function contains an integrated transpose-operator, which comes
// AFTER the primary transformation operation. In the future, I'll optimize
// the code to do more of the transpose-work "in-place". Right now, I've
// left the code as two subroutines and a main calling function, so other
// people can read the code more easily.
//;=============================================================================
//;
//; AP-922 http://developer.intel.com/vtune/cbts/strmsimd
//; These examples contain code fragments for first stage iDCT 8x8
//; (for rows) and first stage DCT 8x8 (for columns)
//;
//;=============================================================================
/*
mword typedef qword
qword ptr equ mword ptr */
#define BITS_INV_ACC 4 //; 4 or 5 for IEEE
// 5 yields higher accuracy, but lessens dynamic range on the input matrix
#define SHIFT_INV_ROW (16 - BITS_INV_ACC)
// for goofy mmx implementation #define SHIFT_INV_COL (1 + BITS_INV_ACC +14 ) // changed from Intel's val)
#define SHIFT_INV_COL (1 + BITS_INV_ACC )
#define RND_INV_ROW (1 << (SHIFT_INV_ROW-1))
#define RND_INV_COL (1 << (SHIFT_INV_COL-1))
#define RND_INV_CORR (RND_INV_COL - 1) //; correction -1.0 and round
//#define RND_INV_ROW (1024 * (6 - BITS_INV_ACC)) //; 1 << (SHIFT_INV_ROW-1)
//#define RND_INV_COL (16 * (BITS_INV_ACC - 3)) //; 1 << (SHIFT_INV_COL-1)
//.data
//Align 16
const static long r_inv_row[2] = { RND_INV_ROW, RND_INV_ROW};
const static long r_inv_col[2] = {RND_INV_COL, RND_INV_COL};
const static long r_inv_corr[2] = {RND_INV_CORR, RND_INV_CORR };
//const static short r_inv_col[4] =
// {RND_INV_COL, RND_INV_COL, RND_INV_COL, RND_INV_COL};
//const static short r_inv_corr[4] =
// {RND_INV_CORR, RND_INV_CORR, RND_INV_CORR, RND_INV_CORR};
/* constants for the forward DCT
//#define BITS_FRW_ACC 3 //; 2 or 3 for accuracy
//#define SHIFT_FRW_COL BITS_FRW_ACC
//#define SHIFT_FRW_ROW (BITS_FRW_ACC + 17)
//#define RND_FRW_ROW (262144 * (BITS_FRW_ACC - 1)) //; 1 << (SHIFT_FRW_ROW-1)
const static __int64 one_corr = 0x0001000100010001;
const static long r_frw_row[2] = {RND_FRW_ROW, RND_FRW_ROW };
//const static short tg_1_16[4] = {13036, 13036, 13036, 13036 }; //tg * (2<<16) + 0.5
//const static short tg_2_16[4] = {27146, 27146, 27146, 27146 }; //tg * (2<<16) + 0.5
//const static short tg_3_16[4] = {-21746, -21746, -21746, -21746 }; //tg * (2<<16) + 0.5
//const static short cos_4_16[4] = {-19195, -19195, -19195, -19195 }; //cos * (2<<16) + 0.5
//const static short ocos_4_16[4] = {23170, 23170, 23170, 23170 }; //cos * (2<<15) + 0.5
//concatenated table, for forward DCT transformation
const static short tg_all_16[] = {
13036, 13036, 13036, 13036, // tg * (2<<16) + 0.5
27146, 27146, 27146, 27146, //tg * (2<<16) + 0.5
-21746, -21746, -21746, -21746, // tg * (2<<16) + 0.5
-19195, -19195, -19195, -19195, //cos * (2<<16) + 0.5
23170, 23170, 23170, 23170 }; //cos * (2<<15) + 0.5
#define tg_1_16 (tg_all_16 + 0)
#define tg_2_16 (tg_all_16 + 8)
#define tg_3_16 (tg_all_16 + 16)
#define cos_4_16 (tg_all_16 + 24)
#define ocos_4_16 (tg_all_16 + 32)
*/
/*
;=============================================================================
;
; The first stage iDCT 8x8 - inverse DCTs of rows
;
;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
; The 8-point inverse DCT direct algorithm
;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
;
; static const short w[32] = {
; FIX(cos_4_16), FIX(cos_2_16), FIX(cos_4_16), FIX(cos_6_16),
; FIX(cos_4_16), FIX(cos_6_16), -FIX(cos_4_16), -FIX(cos_2_16),
; FIX(cos_4_16), -FIX(cos_6_16), -FIX(cos_4_16), FIX(cos_2_16),
; FIX(cos_4_16), -FIX(cos_2_16), FIX(cos_4_16), -FIX(cos_6_16),
; FIX(cos_1_16), FIX(cos_3_16), FIX(cos_5_16), FIX(cos_7_16),
; FIX(cos_3_16), -FIX(cos_7_16), -FIX(cos_1_16), -FIX(cos_5_16),
; FIX(cos_5_16), -FIX(cos_1_16), FIX(cos_7_16), FIX(cos_3_16),
; FIX(cos_7_16), -FIX(cos_5_16), FIX(cos_3_16), -FIX(cos_1_16) };
;
; #define DCT_8_INV_ROW(x, y)
;{
; int a0, a1, a2, a3, b0, b1, b2, b3;
;
; a0 =x[0]*w[0]+x[2]*w[1]+x[4]*w[2]+x[6]*w[3];
; a1 =x[0]*w[4]+x[2]*w[5]+x[4]*w[6]+x[6]*w[7];
; a2 = x[0] * w[ 8] + x[2] * w[ 9] + x[4] * w[10] + x[6] * w[11];
; a3 = x[0] * w[12] + x[2] * w[13] + x[4] * w[14] + x[6] * w[15];
; b0 = x[1] * w[16] + x[3] * w[17] + x[5] * w[18] + x[7] * w[19];
; b1 = x[1] * w[20] + x[3] * w[21] + x[5] * w[22] + x[7] * w[23];
; b2 = x[1] * w[24] + x[3] * w[25] + x[5] * w[26] + x[7] * w[27];
; b3 = x[1] * w[28] + x[3] * w[29] + x[5] * w[30] + x[7] * w[31];
;
; y[0] = SHIFT_ROUND ( a0 + b0 );
; y[1] = SHIFT_ROUND ( a1 + b1 );
; y[2] = SHIFT_ROUND ( a2 + b2 );
; y[3] = SHIFT_ROUND ( a3 + b3 );
; y[4] = SHIFT_ROUND ( a3 - b3 );
; y[5] = SHIFT_ROUND ( a2 - b2 );
; y[6] = SHIFT_ROUND ( a1 - b1 );
; y[7] = SHIFT_ROUND ( a0 - b0 );
;}
;
;-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
;
; In this implementation the outputs of the iDCT-1D are multiplied
; for rows 0,4 - by cos_4_16,
; for rows 1,7 - by cos_1_16,
; for rows 2,6 - by cos_2_16,
; for rows 3,5 - by cos_3_16
; and are shifted to the left for better accuracy
;
; For the constants used,
; FIX(float_const) = (short) (float_const * (1<<15) + 0.5)
;
;=============================================================================
;=============================================================================
IF _MMX ; MMX code
;=============================================================================
/*
//; Table for rows 0,4 - constants are multiplied by cos_4_16
const short tab_i_04[] = {
16384, 16384, 16384, -16384, // ; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
21407, 8867, 8867, -21407, // w07 w05 w03 w01
16384, -16384, 16384, 16384, //; w14 w12 w10 w08
-8867, 21407, -21407, -8867, //; w15 w13 w11 w09
22725, 12873, 19266, -22725, //; w22 w20 w18 w16
19266, 4520, -4520, -12873, //; w23 w21 w19 w17
12873, 4520, 4520, 19266, //; w30 w28 w26 w24
-22725, 19266, -12873, -22725 };//w31 w29 w27 w25
//; Table for rows 1,7 - constants are multiplied by cos_1_16
const short tab_i_17[] = {
22725, 22725, 22725, -22725, // ; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
29692, 12299, 12299, -29692, // ; w07 w05 w03 w01
22725, -22725, 22725, 22725, //; w14 w12 w10 w08
-12299, 29692, -29692, -12299, //; w15 w13 w11 w09
31521, 17855, 26722, -31521, //; w22 w20 w18 w16
26722, 6270, -6270, -17855, //; w23 w21 w19 w17
17855, 6270, 6270, 26722, //; w30 w28 w26 w24
-31521, 26722, -17855, -31521}; // w31 w29 w27 w25
//; Table for rows 2,6 - constants are multiplied by cos_2_16
const short tab_i_26[] = {
21407, 21407, 21407, -21407, // ; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
27969, 11585, 11585, -27969, // ; w07 w05 w03 w01
21407, -21407, 21407, 21407, // ; w14 w12 w10 w08
-11585, 27969, -27969, -11585, // ;w15 w13 w11 w09
29692, 16819, 25172, -29692, // ;w22 w20 w18 w16
25172, 5906, -5906, -16819, // ;w23 w21 w19 w17
16819, 5906, 5906, 25172, // ;w30 w28 w26 w24
-29692, 25172, -16819, -29692}; // ;w31 w29 w27 w25
//; Table for rows 3,5 - constants are multiplied by cos_3_16
const short tab_i_35[] = {
19266, 19266, 19266, -19266, //; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
25172, 10426, 10426, -25172, //; w07 w05 w03 w01
19266, -19266, 19266, 19266, //; w14 w12 w10 w08
-10426, 25172, -25172, -10426, //; w15 w13 w11 w09
26722, 15137, 22654, -26722, //; w22 w20 w18 w16
22654, 5315, -5315, -15137, //; w23 w21 w19 w17
15137, 5315, 5315, 22654, //; w30 w28 w26 w24
-26722, 22654, -15137, -26722}; //; w31 w29 w27 w25
*/
// CONCATENATED TABLE, rows 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7 (in order )
//
// In our implementation, however, we only use row0 !
//
static const short tab_i_01234567[] = {
//row0, this row is required
16384, 16384, 16384, -16384, // ; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
21407, 8867, 8867, -21407, // w07 w05 w03 w01
16384, -16384, 16384, 16384, //; w14 w12 w10 w08
-8867, 21407, -21407, -8867, //; w15 w13 w11 w09
22725, 12873, 19266, -22725, //; w22 w20 w18 w16
19266, 4520, -4520, -12873, //; w23 w21 w19 w17
12873, 4520, 4520, 19266, //; w30 w28 w26 w24
-22725, 19266, -12873, -22725, //w31 w29 w27 w25
// the rest of these rows (1-7), aren't used !
//row1
22725, 22725, 22725, -22725, // ; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
29692, 12299, 12299, -29692, // ; w07 w05 w03 w01
22725, -22725, 22725, 22725, //; w14 w12 w10 w08
-12299, 29692, -29692, -12299, //; w15 w13 w11 w09
31521, 17855, 26722, -31521, //; w22 w20 w18 w16
26722, 6270, -6270, -17855, //; w23 w21 w19 w17
17855, 6270, 6270, 26722, //; w30 w28 w26 w24
-31521, 26722, -17855, -31521, // w31 w29 w27 w25
//row2
21407, 21407, 21407, -21407, // ; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
27969, 11585, 11585, -27969, // ; w07 w05 w03 w01
21407, -21407, 21407, 21407, // ; w14 w12 w10 w08
-11585, 27969, -27969, -11585, // ;w15 w13 w11 w09
29692, 16819, 25172, -29692, // ;w22 w20 w18 w16
25172, 5906, -5906, -16819, // ;w23 w21 w19 w17
16819, 5906, 5906, 25172, // ;w30 w28 w26 w24
-29692, 25172, -16819, -29692, // ;w31 w29 w27 w25
//row3
19266, 19266, 19266, -19266, //; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
25172, 10426, 10426, -25172, //; w07 w05 w03 w01
19266, -19266, 19266, 19266, //; w14 w12 w10 w08
-10426, 25172, -25172, -10426, //; w15 w13 w11 w09
26722, 15137, 22654, -26722, //; w22 w20 w18 w16
22654, 5315, -5315, -15137, //; w23 w21 w19 w17
15137, 5315, 5315, 22654, //; w30 w28 w26 w24
-26722, 22654, -15137, -26722, //; w31 w29 w27 w25
//row4
16384, 16384, 16384, -16384, // ; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
21407, 8867, 8867, -21407, // w07 w05 w03 w01
16384, -16384, 16384, 16384, //; w14 w12 w10 w08
-8867, 21407, -21407, -8867, //; w15 w13 w11 w09
22725, 12873, 19266, -22725, //; w22 w20 w18 w16
19266, 4520, -4520, -12873, //; w23 w21 w19 w17
12873, 4520, 4520, 19266, //; w30 w28 w26 w24
-22725, 19266, -12873, -22725, //w31 w29 w27 w25
//row5
19266, 19266, 19266, -19266, //; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
25172, 10426, 10426, -25172, //; w07 w05 w03 w01
19266, -19266, 19266, 19266, //; w14 w12 w10 w08
-10426, 25172, -25172, -10426, //; w15 w13 w11 w09
26722, 15137, 22654, -26722, //; w22 w20 w18 w16
22654, 5315, -5315, -15137, //; w23 w21 w19 w17
15137, 5315, 5315, 22654, //; w30 w28 w26 w24
-26722, 22654, -15137, -26722, //; w31 w29 w27 w25
//row6
21407, 21407, 21407, -21407, // ; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
27969, 11585, 11585, -27969, // ; w07 w05 w03 w01
21407, -21407, 21407, 21407, // ; w14 w12 w10 w08
-11585, 27969, -27969, -11585, // ;w15 w13 w11 w09
29692, 16819, 25172, -29692, // ;w22 w20 w18 w16
25172, 5906, -5906, -16819, // ;w23 w21 w19 w17
16819, 5906, 5906, 25172, // ;w30 w28 w26 w24
-29692, 25172, -16819, -29692, // ;w31 w29 w27 w25
//row7
22725, 22725, 22725, -22725, // ; movq-> w06 w04 w02 w00
29692, 12299, 12299, -29692, // ; w07 w05 w03 w01
22725, -22725, 22725, 22725, //; w14 w12 w10 w08
-12299, 29692, -29692, -12299, //; w15 w13 w11 w09
31521, 17855, 26722, -31521, //; w22 w20 w18 w16
26722, 6270, -6270, -17855, //; w23 w21 w19 w17
17855, 6270, 6270, 26722, //; w30 w28 w26 w24
-31521, 26722, -17855, -31521}; // w31 w29 w27 w25
#define INP eax // pointer to (short *blk)
#define OUT ecx // pointer to output (temporary store space qwTemp[])
#define TABLE ebx // pointer to tab_i_01234567[]
#define round_inv_row edx
#define round_inv_col edx
#define ROW_STRIDE 16 // for 8x8 matrix transposer
// private variables and functions
//temporary storage space, 8x8 of shorts
static __int64 qwTemp[32];
static __int64 scratch1, scratch2; // scratch variables
// v0.16B34, iDCT operation has been concatenated into ONE function
//__inline static void idct_mmx32_rows( short *blk ); // transform rows
//__inline static void idct_mmx32_cols( short *blk ); // transform "columns"
// the "column" transform actually transforms rows, it is
// identical to the row-transform except for the ROUNDING
// and SHIFTING coefficients.
// public interface, performs iDCT on an array of 64 shorts, blk[8][8]
// input data is overwritten, of course
void
j_rev_dct( short *blk ) // perform complete iDCT on 8x8 blk[]
{
// this routine performs the COMPLETE iDCT 8x8 operation on blk[]
//
// 1) iDCT row transform (1st pass, input data is blk[])
// for( i = 0; i < 8; ++ i)
// DCT_8_INV_ROW_2( blk[i*8], qwTemp[i] );
//
// Output of step 1 -> qwTemp[]. Matrix is transposed in-place.
//
// 2) iDCT row transform (2nd pass, input data is qwTemp[])
// for( i = 0; i < 8; i=i+2)
// DCT_8_INV_ROW_2( qwTemp[i*8], blk[i*8] );
//
// Final output -> blk[]. No need to transpose.
//
//
// v0.16B34 - "pseudo" in-place output transpose
// -------
// minor optimization
//
// The implementation now processes TWO rows per loop iteration.
// The 1st output row (y+0) is stored into scratch variables
//
// The 2nd output row (y+1) is combined with the 1st-row, and
// transposed on the fly. The results are written vertically into
// qwTemp[] (8 dword stores.)
//
// The algorithm in C look something like this
//
// for( i = 0; i < 8; i = i + 2)
// {
// DCT_8_INV_ROW_1( blk[i*8] ); --> store in scratch vars
//
// DCT_8_INV_ROW_1( blk[(i+1)*8] ) --> combine with scratch vars
// // transpose in place
// // stores don't occur in this order
// store DWORD -> [ cols (1,0) "row 0"];
// store DWORD -> [ cols (1,0) "row 2"];
// store DWORD -> [ cols (1,0) "row 1"];
⌨️ 快捷键说明
复制代码Ctrl + C
搜索代码Ctrl + F
全屏模式F11
增大字号Ctrl + =
减小字号Ctrl + -
显示快捷键?