opr_sanity.sql

关系型数据库 Postgresql 6.5.2

--
-- Sanity checks for common errors in making operator/procedure system tables:
-- pg_operator, pg_proc, pg_aggregate, pg_am, pg_amop, pg_amproc, pg_opclass.
--
-- None of the SELECTs here should ever find any matching entries,
-- so the expected output is easy to maintain ;-).
-- A test failure indicates someone messed up an entry in the system tables.
--
-- NB: we assume the oidjoins test will have caught any dangling links,
-- that is OID or REGPROC fields that are not zero and do not match some
-- row in the linked-to table.  However, if we want to enforce that a link
-- field can't be 0, we have to check it here.
--
-- NB: run this test earlier than the create_operator test, because
-- that test creates some bogus operators...
--
-- NOTE hardwired assumptions about standard types:
--                type bool has OID 16
--                type float8 has OID 701
--

-- **************** pg_proc ****************

-- Look for illegal values in pg_proc fields.

SELECT p1.oid, p1.proname
FROM pg_proc as p1
WHERE (p1.prolang = 0 OR p1.prorettype = 0 OR
    p1.pronargs < 0 OR p1.pronargs > 9)
	AND p1.proname !~ '^pl[^_]+_call_handler$';

-- Look for conflicting proc definitions (same names and input datatypes).

SELECT p1.oid, p1.proname, p2.oid, p2.proname
FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.proname = p2.proname AND
    p1.pronargs = p2.pronargs AND
    p1.proargtypes = p2.proargtypes;

-- Considering only built-in procs (prolang = 11), look for multiple uses
-- of the same internal function (ie, matching prosrc fields).  It's OK to
-- have several entries with different pronames for the same internal function,
-- but conflicts in the number of arguments and other critical items should
-- be complained of.

SELECT p1.oid, p1.proname, p2.oid, p2.proname
FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND p1.prolang = 11 AND p2.prolang = 11 AND
    (p1.proisinh != p2.proisinh OR
     p1.proistrusted != p2.proistrusted OR
     p1.proiscachable != p2.proiscachable OR
     p1.pronargs != p2.pronargs OR
     p1.proretset != p2.proretset);

-- Look for uses of different type OIDs in the argument/result type fields
-- for different aliases of the same built-in function.
-- This indicates that the types are being presumed to be binary-equivalent.
-- That's not wrong, necessarily, but we make lists of all the types being
-- so treated.  Note that the expected output of this part of the test will
-- need to be modified whenever new pairs of types are made binary-equivalent!

SELECT DISTINCT p1.prorettype, p2.prorettype
FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND p1.prolang = 11 AND p2.prolang = 11 AND
    (p1.prorettype < p2.prorettype);

SELECT DISTINCT p1.proargtypes[0], p2.proargtypes[0]
FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND p1.prolang = 11 AND p2.prolang = 11 AND
    (p1.proargtypes[0] < p2.proargtypes[0]);

SELECT DISTINCT p1.proargtypes[1], p2.proargtypes[1]
FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND p1.prolang = 11 AND p2.prolang = 11 AND
    (p1.proargtypes[1] < p2.proargtypes[1]);

SELECT DISTINCT p1.proargtypes[2], p2.proargtypes[2]
FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND p1.prolang = 11 AND p2.prolang = 11 AND
    (p1.proargtypes[2] < p2.proargtypes[2]);

SELECT DISTINCT p1.proargtypes[3], p2.proargtypes[3]
FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND p1.prolang = 11 AND p2.prolang = 11 AND
    (p1.proargtypes[3] < p2.proargtypes[3]);

SELECT DISTINCT p1.proargtypes[4], p2.proargtypes[4]
FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND p1.prolang = 11 AND p2.prolang = 11 AND
    (p1.proargtypes[4] < p2.proargtypes[4]);

SELECT DISTINCT p1.proargtypes[5], p2.proargtypes[5]
FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND p1.prolang = 11 AND p2.prolang = 11 AND
    (p1.proargtypes[5] < p2.proargtypes[5]);

SELECT DISTINCT p1.proargtypes[6], p2.proargtypes[6]
FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND p1.prolang = 11 AND p2.prolang = 11 AND
    (p1.proargtypes[6] < p2.proargtypes[6]);

SELECT DISTINCT p1.proargtypes[7], p2.proargtypes[7]
FROM pg_proc AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.prosrc = p2.prosrc AND p1.prolang = 11 AND p2.prolang = 11 AND
    (p1.proargtypes[7] < p2.proargtypes[7]);

-- **************** pg_operator ****************

-- Look for illegal values in pg_operator fields.

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprname
FROM pg_operator as p1
WHERE (p1.oprkind != 'b' AND p1.oprkind != 'l' AND p1.oprkind != 'r') OR
    p1.oprresult = 0 OR p1.oprcode = 0;

-- Look for missing or unwanted operand types

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprname
FROM pg_operator as p1
WHERE (p1.oprleft = 0 and p1.oprkind != 'l') OR
    (p1.oprleft != 0 and p1.oprkind = 'l') OR
    (p1.oprright = 0 and p1.oprkind != 'r') OR
    (p1.oprright != 0 and p1.oprkind = 'r');

-- Look for conflicting operator definitions (same names and input datatypes).

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprcode, p2.oid, p2.oprcode
FROM pg_operator AS p1, pg_operator AS p2
WHERE p1.oid != p2.oid AND
    p1.oprname = p2.oprname AND
    p1.oprkind = p2.oprkind AND
    p1.oprleft = p2.oprleft AND
    p1.oprright = p2.oprright;

-- Look for commutative operators that don't commute.
-- DEFINITIONAL NOTE: If A.oprcom = B, then x A y has the same result as y B x.
-- We expect that B will always say that B.oprcom = A as well; that's not
-- inherently essential, but it would be inefficient not to mark it so.

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprcode, p2.oid, p2.oprcode
FROM pg_operator AS p1, pg_operator AS p2
WHERE p1.oprcom = p2.oid AND
    (p1.oprkind != 'b' OR
     p1.oprleft != p2.oprright OR
     p1.oprright != p2.oprleft OR
     p1.oprresult != p2.oprresult OR
     p1.oid != p2.oprcom);

-- Look for negatory operators that don't agree.
-- DEFINITIONAL NOTE: If A.oprnegate = B, then both A and B must yield
-- boolean results, and (x A y) == ! (x B y), or the equivalent for
-- single-operand operators.
-- We expect that B will always say that B.oprnegate = A as well; that's not
-- inherently essential, but it would be inefficient not to mark it so.

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprcode, p2.oid, p2.oprcode
FROM pg_operator AS p1, pg_operator AS p2
WHERE p1.oprnegate = p2.oid AND
    (p1.oprkind != p2.oprkind OR
     p1.oprleft != p2.oprleft OR
     p1.oprright != p2.oprright OR
     p1.oprresult != 16 OR
     p2.oprresult != 16 OR
     p1.oid != p2.oprnegate);

-- Look for mergejoin operators that don't match their links.
-- A mergejoin link leads from an '=' operator to the
-- sort operator ('<' operator) that's appropriate for
-- its left-side or right-side data type.

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprcode, p2.oid, p2.oprcode
FROM pg_operator AS p1, pg_operator AS p2
WHERE p1.oprlsortop = p2.oid AND
    (p1.oprname != '=' OR p2.oprname != '<' OR
     p1.oprkind != 'b' OR p2.oprkind != 'b' OR
     p1.oprleft != p2.oprleft OR
     p1.oprleft != p2.oprright OR
     p1.oprresult != 16 OR
     p2.oprresult != 16 OR
     p1.oprrsortop = 0);

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprcode, p2.oid, p2.oprcode
FROM pg_operator AS p1, pg_operator AS p2
WHERE p1.oprrsortop = p2.oid AND
    (p1.oprname != '=' OR p2.oprname != '<' OR
     p1.oprkind != 'b' OR p2.oprkind != 'b' OR
     p1.oprright != p2.oprleft OR
     p1.oprright != p2.oprright OR
     p1.oprresult != 16 OR
     p2.oprresult != 16 OR
     p1.oprlsortop = 0);

-- A mergejoinable = operator must have a commutator (usually itself)
-- as well as corresponding < and > operators.  Note that the "corresponding"
-- operators have the same L and R input datatypes as the = operator,
-- whereas the operators linked to by oprlsortop and oprrsortop have input
-- datatypes L,L and R,R respectively.

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprname FROM pg_operator AS p1
WHERE p1.oprlsortop != 0 AND
      p1.oprcom = 0;

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprname FROM pg_operator AS p1
WHERE p1.oprlsortop != 0 AND NOT
      EXISTS(SELECT * FROM pg_operator AS p2 WHERE
        p2.oprname = '<' AND
        p2.oprleft = p1.oprleft AND
        p2.oprright = p1.oprright AND
        p2.oprkind = 'b');

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprname FROM pg_operator AS p1
WHERE p1.oprlsortop != 0 AND NOT
      EXISTS(SELECT * FROM pg_operator AS p2 WHERE
        p2.oprname = '>' AND
        p2.oprleft = p1.oprleft AND
        p2.oprright = p1.oprright AND
        p2.oprkind = 'b');

-- Hashing only works on simple equality operators "type = sametype",
-- since the hash itself depends on the bitwise representation of the type.
-- Check that allegedly hashable operators look like they might be "=".
-- NOTE: in 6.5, this search finds int4eqoid and oideqint4.  Until we have
-- some cleaner way of dealing with binary-equivalent types, just leave
-- those two tuples in the expected output.

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprname
FROM pg_operator AS p1
WHERE p1.oprcanhash AND NOT
    (p1.oprkind = 'b' AND p1.oprresult = 16 AND p1.oprleft = p1.oprright AND
     p1.oprname = '=' AND p1.oprcom = p1.oid);

-- Look for array equality operators that are hashable when the underlying
-- type is not, or vice versa.  This is presumably bogus.

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprcanhash, p2.oid, p2.oprcanhash, t1.typname, t2.typname
FROM pg_operator AS p1, pg_operator AS p2, pg_type AS t1, pg_type AS t2
WHERE p1.oprname = '=' AND p1.oprleft = p1.oprright AND 
    p2.oprname = '=' AND p2.oprleft = p2.oprright AND
    p1.oprleft = t1.oid AND p2.oprleft = t2.oid AND t1.typelem = t2.oid AND
    p1.oprcanhash != p2.oprcanhash;

-- Check that each operator defined in pg_operator matches its oprcode entry
-- in pg_proc.  Easiest to do this separately for each oprkind.
-- FIXME: want to check that argument/result types match, but how to do that
-- in the face of binary-compatible types?

SELECT p1.oid, p1.oprname, p2.oid, p2.proname
FROM pg_operator AS p1, pg_proc AS p2
WHERE p1.oprcode = p2.oid AND
    p1.oprkind = 'b' AND
    (p2.pronargs != 2